Welcome!
Important information
-- Spectre and Meltdown vulnerabilities

News
-- MX Linux on social media: here
-- Mepis support still here

Current releases
-- MX-18 Final release info here
-- Migration Information to MX-18 here
-- antiX-17.3 release info here

New users
-- Please read this first, and don't forget to add system and hardware information to posts!
-- Here are the Forum Rules

Dedoimedo review of MX-18

User avatar
Redacted
Forum Regular
Forum Regular
Posts: 201
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2017 6:53 am

Dedoimedo review of MX-18

#1

Post by Redacted » Mon Jan 14, 2019 5:11 pm


User avatar
Adrian
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 9371
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 1:42 am

Re: Dedoimedo review of MX-18

#2

Post by Adrian » Mon Jan 14, 2019 7:07 pm

Great review, we also should not be complacent and try to improve things.

User avatar
manyroads
Forum Regular
Forum Regular
Posts: 554
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2018 6:33 pm

Re: Dedoimedo review of MX-18

#3

Post by manyroads » Mon Jan 14, 2019 7:16 pm

Adrian wrote:
Mon Jan 14, 2019 7:07 pm
Great review, we also should not be complacent and try to improve things.
I agree. I've been banging around a bit playing with things.... :p :eek:
"Don't believe everything you think."
Pax vobiscum,
Mark Rabideau - http://many-roads.com
MX-18 4.20.0-antix.1-amd64-smp x86_64
Dell Latitude E5470
Dual Core Intel i5-6300U (-MT MCP-)
Mem: 8GB SSD: 978.09 GiB
Reg. Linux User #449130

User avatar
richb
Administrator
Posts: 17796
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:17 pm

Re: Dedoimedo review of MX-18

#4

Post by richb » Mon Jan 14, 2019 7:28 pm

Always room for improvement. Perfection is an elusive goal we should aspire to. One comment, an application only panel can be achieved by adding a second xfce panel without needing plank or other panel apps. But that is not obvious and maybe an MX Tweak option could be developed. Thinking out loud.
Forum Rules
Guide - How to Ask for Help

Rich
SSD Production: MX 17.1
AMD A8 7600 FM2+ CPU R7 Graphics, 16 GIG Mem. Three Samsung EVO SSD's 250 GB, 350 GB HD

User avatar
kc1di
Forum Novice
Forum  Novice
Posts: 39
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 8:47 am

Re: Dedoimedo review of MX-18

#5

Post by kc1di » Mon Jan 14, 2019 7:36 pm

Good review.

User avatar
manyroads
Forum Regular
Forum Regular
Posts: 554
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2018 6:33 pm

Re: Dedoimedo review of MX-18

#6

Post by manyroads » Mon Jan 14, 2019 7:45 pm

richb wrote:
Mon Jan 14, 2019 7:28 pm
Always room for improvement. Perfection is an elusive goal we should aspire to. One comment, an application only panel can be achieved by adding a second xfce panel without needing plank or other panel apps. But that is not obvious and maybe an MX Tweak option could be developed. Thinking out loud.
I have been prototyping that (multiple panels) in the children's MX Desktop I'm building. There's good and bad news to using xfce-panels rather than Plank.
  • Plank doesn't come through on a snapshot always. I don't know why.
  • xfce-panel looks really old school because the icons do not change size as you Mouseover them....
  • xfce-panel though is stable, survives snapshots nicely and just works.
I do think MX would benefit greatly from an enhanced xfce-panel, as would the rest of the xfce world. Just offering an opinion with out thinking too hard (which is dangerous for me. :lipsrsealed: )
"Don't believe everything you think."
Pax vobiscum,
Mark Rabideau - http://many-roads.com
MX-18 4.20.0-antix.1-amd64-smp x86_64
Dell Latitude E5470
Dual Core Intel i5-6300U (-MT MCP-)
Mem: 8GB SSD: 978.09 GiB
Reg. Linux User #449130

User avatar
richb
Administrator
Posts: 17796
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:17 pm

Re: Dedoimedo review of MX-18

#7

Post by richb » Mon Jan 14, 2019 7:49 pm

xfce-panel looks really old school because the icons do not change size as you Mouseover them....
I am glad id doesn't. :rolleyes:
Forum Rules
Guide - How to Ask for Help

Rich
SSD Production: MX 17.1
AMD A8 7600 FM2+ CPU R7 Graphics, 16 GIG Mem. Three Samsung EVO SSD's 250 GB, 350 GB HD

User avatar
manyroads
Forum Regular
Forum Regular
Posts: 554
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2018 6:33 pm

Re: Dedoimedo review of MX-18

#8

Post by manyroads » Mon Jan 14, 2019 7:54 pm

richb wrote:
Mon Jan 14, 2019 7:49 pm
xfce-panel looks really old school because the icons do not change size as you Mouseover them....
I am glad id doesn't. :rolleyes:
The thing is that people younger than we are... yes, there are a few :lipsrsealed: ... are used to having certain icon behaviors. Xfce-panel doesn't have them. :bawling:
"Don't believe everything you think."
Pax vobiscum,
Mark Rabideau - http://many-roads.com
MX-18 4.20.0-antix.1-amd64-smp x86_64
Dell Latitude E5470
Dual Core Intel i5-6300U (-MT MCP-)
Mem: 8GB SSD: 978.09 GiB
Reg. Linux User #449130

User avatar
richb
Administrator
Posts: 17796
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:17 pm

Re: Dedoimedo review of MX-18

#9

Post by richb » Mon Jan 14, 2019 7:59 pm

manyroads wrote:
Mon Jan 14, 2019 7:54 pm
richb wrote:
Mon Jan 14, 2019 7:49 pm
xfce-panel looks really old school because the icons do not change size as you Mouseover them....
I am glad id doesn't. :rolleyes:
The thing is that people younger than we are... yes, there are a few :lipsrsealed: ... are used to having certain icon behaviors. Xfce-panel doesn't have them. :bawling:
You are right and I was going to refer to my old fa%^ism but desisted.
Forum Rules
Guide - How to Ask for Help

Rich
SSD Production: MX 17.1
AMD A8 7600 FM2+ CPU R7 Graphics, 16 GIG Mem. Three Samsung EVO SSD's 250 GB, 350 GB HD

User avatar
manyroads
Forum Regular
Forum Regular
Posts: 554
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2018 6:33 pm

Re: Dedoimedo review of MX-18

#10

Post by manyroads » Mon Jan 14, 2019 8:03 pm

Yes... perhaps best left as it is. ;) As my oldest grandson said this week (he's 5.5), "opa (that's me) I love you, even if you are old." :happy:
"Don't believe everything you think."
Pax vobiscum,
Mark Rabideau - http://many-roads.com
MX-18 4.20.0-antix.1-amd64-smp x86_64
Dell Latitude E5470
Dual Core Intel i5-6300U (-MT MCP-)
Mem: 8GB SSD: 978.09 GiB
Reg. Linux User #449130

Post Reply

Return to “General”