MX-18 beta 1 feedback

Locked
Message
Author
User avatar
anticapitalista
Developer
Posts: 4165
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 10:40 am

Re: MX-18 beta 1 feedback

#261 Post by anticapitalista »

CONFIG_CRYPTO_XTS is needed from what I found on the net.
anticapitalista
Reg. linux user #395339.

Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.

antiX with runit - lean and mean.
https://antixlinux.com

User avatar
dolphin_oracle
Developer
Posts: 20007
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 1:17 pm

Re: MX-18 beta 1 feedback

#262 Post by dolphin_oracle »

anticapitalista wrote: Sun Dec 09, 2018 1:12 pm CONFIG_CRYPTO_XTS is needed from what I found on the net.
here's what we have on the 32 bit.

Code: Select all

CONFIG_CRYPTO_XTS=m
I'm trying one of the antiX kernels.
http://www.youtube.com/runwiththedolphin
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.

User avatar
anticapitalista
Developer
Posts: 4165
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 10:40 am

Re: MX-18 beta 1 feedback

#263 Post by anticapitalista »

antiX kernels has that as CONFIG_CRYPTO_XTS=y
anticapitalista
Reg. linux user #395339.

Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.

antiX with runit - lean and mean.
https://antixlinux.com

davemx
Posts: 319
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2018 2:31 pm

Re: MX-18 beta 1 feedback

#264 Post by davemx »

I installed it last night, on Desktop only. I'm using it now. So far the stuff I've done so far works, but GIMP 2.10 clashes with data files needed for MyPaint (no such problem with 2.8 and I hate the grey scheme but none of that is the fault of this excellent distro). Hopefully I'll be able to push a few things and test them over the next few days.

Can report now: Printing and Scanning working perfectly

To revert GIMP interface theme: https://www.daviesmediadesign.com/custo ... interface/
Last edited by davemx on Sun Dec 09, 2018 3:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Desktop: Mini-Box M350 with Asus H110i-plus motherboard, Pentium G4600 processor, 2TB SSD and 16Gb RAM DDR4-2133
Printer/Scanner: Brother MFC-J5335W
Laptop: Lenovo V15 ADA
Media Centre: Lenovo Q190

User avatar
dolphin_oracle
Developer
Posts: 20007
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 1:17 pm

Re: MX-18 beta 1 feedback

#265 Post by dolphin_oracle »

anticapitalista wrote: Sun Dec 09, 2018 1:34 pm antiX kernels has that as CONFIG_CRYPTO_XTS=y
I tried a snapshot with the antix 4.19.7 kernel but I'm getting a copy modules error in the cli LUM.
http://www.youtube.com/runwiththedolphin
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.

User avatar
Stevo
Developer
Posts: 12837
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:07 pm

Re: MX-18 beta 1 feedback

#266 Post by Stevo »

Don't "=y" and "=m" both enable the feature? One just makes it part of the monolithic kernel and the other makes it a loadable module.

User avatar
dolphin_oracle
Developer
Posts: 20007
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 1:17 pm

Re: MX-18 beta 1 feedback

#267 Post by dolphin_oracle »

Stevo wrote: Sun Dec 09, 2018 4:05 pm Don't "=y" and "=m" both enable the feature? One just makes it part of the monolithic kernel and the other makes it a loadable module.
honestly not sure, but the 64 bit has an "m" as well.

I've only tried 2, but I can't make a 32 bit encrypted usb with a 4.19 kernel, yet.

building a 64 bit encrypted usb seems to work fine with our kernel (confirming richb's post)
http://www.youtube.com/runwiththedolphin
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.

User avatar
mystic
Posts: 65
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2018 1:37 am

Re: MX-18 beta 1 feedback

#268 Post by mystic »

MX-LSD conky disappears when I click anywhere on the desktop

User avatar
dolphin_oracle
Developer
Posts: 20007
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 1:17 pm

Re: MX-18 beta 1 feedback

#269 Post by dolphin_oracle »

dolphin_oracle wrote: Sun Dec 09, 2018 4:10 pm
Stevo wrote: Sun Dec 09, 2018 4:05 pm Don't "=y" and "=m" both enable the feature? One just makes it part of the monolithic kernel and the other makes it a loadable module.
honestly not sure, but the 64 bit has an "m" as well.

I've only tried 2, but I can't make a 32 bit encrypted usb with a 4.19 kernel, yet.

building a 64 bit encrypted usb seems to work fine with our kernel (confirming richb's post)
same story with the 4.18 kernel. 32 bit kernel from alpha 1
http://www.youtube.com/runwiththedolphin
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.

User avatar
anticapitalista
Developer
Posts: 4165
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 10:40 am

Re: MX-18 beta 1 feedback

#270 Post by anticapitalista »

dolphin_oracle wrote: Sun Dec 09, 2018 5:33 pm
dolphin_oracle wrote: Sun Dec 09, 2018 4:10 pm
Stevo wrote: Sun Dec 09, 2018 4:05 pm Don't "=y" and "=m" both enable the feature? One just makes it part of the monolithic kernel and the other makes it a loadable module.
honestly not sure, but the 64 bit has an "m" as well.

I've only tried 2, but I can't make a 32 bit encrypted usb with a 4.19 kernel, yet.

building a 64 bit encrypted usb seems to work fine with our kernel (confirming richb's post)
same story with the 4.18 kernel. 32 bit kernel from alpha 1
same with antiX-4.19.7 kernel (on antiX).
I know the 4.9 antiX kernel does work.
anticapitalista
Reg. linux user #395339.

Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.

antiX with runit - lean and mean.
https://antixlinux.com

Locked

Return to “General”