MX Flash

Message
Author
User avatar
Stevo
Developer
Posts: 12776
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:07 pm

Re: MX Flash

#11 Post by Stevo »

Yes, I can build them--I can't find any strings in the source that say MX 15, though.

User avatar
kmathern
Developer
Posts: 2403
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:26 pm

Re: MX Flash

#12 Post by kmathern »

Stevo wrote:Yes, I can build them--I can't find any strings in the source that say MX 15, though.
When I press the "About..." button I see a mx15 in the version (16.7mx15)
mx-flash-about.png

User avatar
Adrian
Developer
Posts: 8250
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 1:42 am

Re: MX Flash

#13 Post by Adrian »

That is picked up automatically from dpkg, so if the debian file is modified to build a mx14 package that will show up correctly.

User avatar
Stevo
Developer
Posts: 12776
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:07 pm

Re: MX Flash

#14 Post by Stevo »

I did change the version to 16.7mx14, so that's what shows in the "About" dialog. :) It was also able to update NPAPI Flash to the .626 version from the Debian source, so I had to use the -direct script to get a full update to .632

It's not displaying its icon in the older MX 14 MX Tools, though--that probably could also use an update.

User avatar
Stevo
Developer
Posts: 12776
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:07 pm

Re: MX Flash

#15 Post by Stevo »

I've noticed that MX-Flash will happily run an "upgrade" that actually downgrades the 11.202.632 version installed with the -direct script back down to the .626 version the ordinary flashplugin-nonfree script currently knows about, even in the background if that's what it's configured to do--even if MX Flash reports both the installed .632 and upstream .632 are the most recent available. This makes Firefox start complaining bout an insecure plugin again. I'm working around it now by using the PPAPI plugin in Firefox, but some people may want to use the 11.2.X Flash for DRM content.

Post Reply

Return to “General”