Rage against the systemd 'machine'

For interesting topics. But remember this is a Linux Forum. Do not post offensive topics that are meant to cause trouble with other members or are derogatory towards people of different genders, race, color, minors (this includes nudity and sex), politics or religion. Let's try to keep peace among the community and for visitors.

No spam on this or any other forums please! If you post advertisements on these forums, your account may be deleted.

Do not copy and paste entire or even up to half of someone else's words or articles into posts. Post only a few sentences or a paragraph and make sure to include a link back to original words or article. Otherwise it's copyright infringement.

You can talk about other distros here, but no MX bashing. You can email the developers of MX if you just want to say you dislike or hate MX.
Message
Author
User avatar
timkb4cq
Developer
Posts: 3203
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 4:05 pm

Re: Rage against the systemd 'machine'

#61 Post by timkb4cq »

Head_on_a_Stick wrote: Wed Jun 05, 2019 3:16 pm
timkb4cq wrote: Wed Jun 05, 2019 12:07 am Poettering looked at Apple's launchd and thought "Hey, wouldn't it be better if processes in Linux could be centrally tracked and managed as well as Apple does it?"
Process supervision is a fundamental part of init system functionality and it is offered by both runit and OpenRC, along with most other PID1 implementations.
Yes, runit has basic process management, but not to the extent that systemd has with cgroups where cpu, memory, i/o, etc can be limited & tracked (and yes, I realize OpenRC can integrate with cgroups). Nor does it do all the other things (that IMHO don't really belong in the init) like device management, power management, mount points, cron, encryption, etc. that are rolled into systemd.
It wasn't the if that was the itch Poettering was scratching it was the as well as.
HP Pavillion TP01, AMD Ryzen 3 5300G (quad core), Crucial 500GB SSD, Toshiba 6TB 7200rpm
Dell Inspiron 15, AMD Ryzen 7 2700u (quad core). Sabrent 500GB nvme, Seagate 1TB

User avatar
duane
Posts: 266
Joined: Sun May 20, 2007 3:08 pm

Re: Rage against the systemd 'machine'

#62 Post by duane »

I just want to point out that I think Mint is not a good example since it is a business owned by an individual.
Hey, I agree getting old is the pits!
We know very little about the future until Anti gets the beta out.
I can wait and see without all of this speculation.
Lenovo M92p Quad Core i5 3470 3.2Ghz

User avatar
rasat
Posts: 644
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2017 1:19 pm

Re: Rage against the systemd 'machine'

#63 Post by rasat »

anticapitalista wrote: Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:32 am Here it is running in virtualbox,

Code: Select all

System:    Host: antix1 Kernel: 4.9.176-antix.1-amd64-smp x86_64 bits: 64 compiler: gcc v: 8.3.0 
           Desktop: Gnome 3.30.2 wm: gnome-shell dm: SLiM 1.3.6 
           Distro: antiX-19.a3_x64-full Marielle Franco 5 June 2019 
           base: Debian GNU/Linux 10 (buster) 
Memory:    RAM: total: 996.2 MiB used: 544.4 MiB (54.7%) 
Repos:     Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/antix.list 
           1: deb http: //ftp.cc.uoc.gr/mirrors/linux/mx/antix/buster buster main nonfree
           Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian-stable-updates.list 
           1: deb http: //ftp.gr.debian.org/debian/ buster-updates main contrib non-free
           Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian.list 
           1: deb http: //ftp.gr.debian.org/debian/ buster main contrib non-free
           2: deb http: //security.debian.org/ buster/updates main contrib non-free
           No active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/onion.list 
           No active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/various.list 
Processes: CPU top: 5 
           1: cpu: 39.9% command: packagekitd pid: 2424 mem: 17.4 MiB (1.7%) 
           2: cpu: 19.3% command: gnome-shell pid: 2284 mem: 243.8 MiB (24.4%) 
           3: cpu: 6.1% command: gnome-software pid: 2536 mem: 113.5 MiB (11.3%) 
           4: cpu: 1.4% command: xorg pid: 2027 mem: 58.9 MiB (5.9%) 
           5: cpu: 0.9% command: init pid: 1 mem: 2.09 MiB (0.2%) 
           Memory top: 5 
           1: mem: 243.8 MiB (24.4%) command: gnome-shell pid: 2284 cpu: 19.3% 
           2: mem: 113.5 MiB (11.3%) command: gnome-software pid: 2536 cpu: 6.1% 
           3: mem: 58.9 MiB (5.9%) command: xorg pid: 2027 cpu: 1.4% 
           4: mem: 51.7 MiB (5.1%) command: evolution-alarm-notify pid: 2531 cpu: 0.7% 
           5: mem: 30.7 MiB (3.0%) command: clipit pid: 2533 cpu: 0.3% 
Info:      Processes: 163 Uptime: 1m Init: SysVinit v: 2.93 runlevel: 5 default: 5 Compilers: 
           gcc: 8.3.0 alt: 8 Client: Gnome v: 3.30.2 inxi: 3.0.33 
Thanks anticapitalista, looks promising to have a system which runs all DE and WM, freedom of choice. I will take a look at the repos.

User avatar
anticapitalista
Developer
Posts: 4166
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 10:40 am

Re: Rage against the systemd 'machine'

#64 Post by anticapitalista »

rasat wrote: Thu Jun 06, 2019 3:54 am
anticapitalista wrote: Wed Jun 05, 2019 6:32 am Here it is running in virtualbox,

Code: Select all

System:    Host: antix1 Kernel: 4.9.176-antix.1-amd64-smp x86_64 bits: 64 compiler: gcc v: 8.3.0 
           Desktop: Gnome 3.30.2 wm: gnome-shell dm: SLiM 1.3.6 
           Distro: antiX-19.a3_x64-full Marielle Franco 5 June 2019 
           base: Debian GNU/Linux 10 (buster) 
Memory:    RAM: total: 996.2 MiB used: 544.4 MiB (54.7%) 
Repos:     Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/antix.list 
           1: deb http: //ftp.cc.uoc.gr/mirrors/linux/mx/antix/buster buster main nonfree
           Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian-stable-updates.list 
           1: deb http: //ftp.gr.debian.org/debian/ buster-updates main contrib non-free
           Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian.list 
           1: deb http: //ftp.gr.debian.org/debian/ buster main contrib non-free
           2: deb http: //security.debian.org/ buster/updates main contrib non-free
           No active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/onion.list 
           No active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/various.list 
Processes: CPU top: 5 
           1: cpu: 39.9% command: packagekitd pid: 2424 mem: 17.4 MiB (1.7%) 
           2: cpu: 19.3% command: gnome-shell pid: 2284 mem: 243.8 MiB (24.4%) 
           3: cpu: 6.1% command: gnome-software pid: 2536 mem: 113.5 MiB (11.3%) 
           4: cpu: 1.4% command: xorg pid: 2027 mem: 58.9 MiB (5.9%) 
           5: cpu: 0.9% command: init pid: 1 mem: 2.09 MiB (0.2%) 
           Memory top: 5 
           1: mem: 243.8 MiB (24.4%) command: gnome-shell pid: 2284 cpu: 19.3% 
           2: mem: 113.5 MiB (11.3%) command: gnome-software pid: 2536 cpu: 6.1% 
           3: mem: 58.9 MiB (5.9%) command: xorg pid: 2027 cpu: 1.4% 
           4: mem: 51.7 MiB (5.1%) command: evolution-alarm-notify pid: 2531 cpu: 0.7% 
           5: mem: 30.7 MiB (3.0%) command: clipit pid: 2533 cpu: 0.3% 
Info:      Processes: 163 Uptime: 1m Init: SysVinit v: 2.93 runlevel: 5 default: 5 Compilers: 
           gcc: 8.3.0 alt: 8 Client: Gnome v: 3.30.2 inxi: 3.0.33 
Thanks anticapitalista, looks promising to have a system which runs all DE and WM, freedom of choice. I will take a look at the repos.
I didn't even need the nosystemd repo enabled (buster). You must install elogind and libpam-elogind-compat
anticapitalista
Reg. linux user #395339.

Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.

antiX with runit - lean and mean.
https://antixlinux.com

User avatar
manyroads
Posts: 2623
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2018 6:33 pm

Re: Rage against the systemd 'machine'

#65 Post by manyroads »

Here's my status update on antiX19 with Xfce & Openbox... (systemd-free)

viewtopic.php?f=40&t=50768
Pax vobiscum,
Mark Rabideau - ManyRoads Genealogy -or- eirenicon llc. (geeky stuff)
i3wm, bspwm, hlwm, dwm, spectrwm ~ Linux #449130
"For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong." -- H. L. Mencken

User avatar
Head_on_a_Stick
Posts: 919
Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2019 3:37 pm

Re: Rage against the systemd 'machine'

#66 Post by Head_on_a_Stick »

timkb4cq wrote: Wed Jun 05, 2019 5:25 pm
Head_on_a_Stick wrote: Wed Jun 05, 2019 3:16 pm
timkb4cq wrote: Wed Jun 05, 2019 12:07 am Poettering looked at Apple's launchd and thought "Hey, wouldn't it be better if processes in Linux could be centrally tracked and managed as well as Apple does it?"
Process supervision is a fundamental part of init system functionality and it is offered by both runit and OpenRC, along with most other PID1 implementations.
Yes, runit has basic process management, but not to the extent that systemd has with cgroups where cpu, memory, i/o, etc can be limited & tracked (and yes, I realize OpenRC can integrate with cgroups). Nor does it do all the other things (that IMHO don't really belong in the init) like device management, power management, mount points, cron, encryption, etc. that are rolled into systemd.
Those extra features that you don't like can be disabled, both at run time and at compile time — you could even package up a version of systemd with all the those bits removed from the code just by using ./configure flags :happy:
mod note: Signature removed, please read the forum rules

User avatar
manyroads
Posts: 2623
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2018 6:33 pm

Re: Rage against the systemd 'machine'

#67 Post by manyroads »

double-posted (sorry)
Last edited by manyroads on Fri Jun 07, 2019 3:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Pax vobiscum,
Mark Rabideau - ManyRoads Genealogy -or- eirenicon llc. (geeky stuff)
i3wm, bspwm, hlwm, dwm, spectrwm ~ Linux #449130
"For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong." -- H. L. Mencken

User avatar
dolphin_oracle
Developer
Posts: 20012
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 1:17 pm

Re: Rage against the systemd 'machine'

#68 Post by dolphin_oracle »

debian actually disables a lot of stuff on its live images...
http://www.youtube.com/runwiththedolphin
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.

User avatar
manyroads
Posts: 2623
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2018 6:33 pm

Re: Rage against the systemd 'machine'

#69 Post by manyroads »

The eirenicon (ManyRoads) antiXalpha Respin (Xfce & Openbox) is now in the wild. You may read about what it contains, how it was built, download it, etc. from here:

http://eirenicon.org/2019/06/07/antix-o ... n-release/

Enjoy antiX systemd-free and buster based alpha software! :bagoverhead:
Pax vobiscum,
Mark Rabideau - ManyRoads Genealogy -or- eirenicon llc. (geeky stuff)
i3wm, bspwm, hlwm, dwm, spectrwm ~ Linux #449130
"For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong." -- H. L. Mencken

User avatar
rasat
Posts: 644
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2017 1:19 pm

Re: Rage against the systemd 'machine'

#70 Post by rasat »

anticapitalista wrote: Thu Jun 06, 2019 10:07 am I didn't even need the nosystemd repo enabled (buster). You must install elogind and libpam-elogind-compat
Did fresh AntiX19 alpha install, nosystemd repo is needed. Without, gives unmet dependencies errors:

Code: Select all

gnome-shell : Depends: gnome-settings-daemon (>= 3.16.0) but it is not going to be installed
Depends: libpulse-mainloop-glib0 (>= 0.99.1) but it is not going to be installed
Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/antix.list
deb https://mirrors.netix.net/mx/MX-Packages/antix/buster buster main nosystemd nonfree
deb http://ftp.cc.uoc.gr/mirrors/linux/mx/antix/buster buster main nonfree

Other repos fine as they they are.

Post Reply

Return to “General”