Interesting article about the use of SIP softphones on Linux in company environments

For interesting topics. But remember this is a Linux Forum. Do not post offensive topics that are meant to cause trouble with other members or are derogatory towards people of different genders, race, color, minors (this includes nudity and sex), politics or religion. Let's try to keep peace among the community and for visitors.

No spam on this or any other forums please! If you post advertisements on these forums, your account may be deleted.

Do not copy and paste entire or even up to half of someone else's words or articles into posts. Post only a few sentences or a paragraph and make sure to include a link back to original words or article. Otherwise it's copyright infringement.

You can talk about other distros here, but no MX bashing. You can email the developers of MX if you just want to say you dislike or hate MX.
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
MX-16_fan
Posts: 331
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 12:09 pm

Interesting article about the use of SIP softphones on Linux in company environments

#1 Post by MX-16_fan »

@all:

I happened to find this: http://www.linux-magazin.de/ausgaben/2016/10/bitparade/ well-written and well-researched article from LINUX MAGAZIN about the use of SIP softphones on Linux in professional company environments.

SIP (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Session_I ... n_Protocol) is a communications protocol. Unlike the Skype protocol it is open and well-documented. This made the creation of Free/Libre Open Source (FLOSS) communications applications possible (e.g. Linphone, Twinkle). SIP providers also enable you to call normal telephones, usually at very cheap rates.

Bottom line of the article, with respect to MX-17, would be:

* With respect to data security, professional company use could require a non-proprietary protocol (which SIP is), and SRTP (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_Re ... t_Protocol) capabilities (in jurisdictions in which labour law and business data handling regulations force companies to choose the best security possible when it comes to the protection of employee-to-employee-communications).

* Ekiga can't do SRTP yet. (The wonderful Twinkle, which hasn't been tested, can't either btw., and has been discontinued.)

* The testers recommended only Jitsi and Linphone for classic standard SIP tasks. (Btw. as for now we don't have Jitsi in MX-17's Test Repo yet, nor an up-to-date Linphone version.)

The test has been published in October 2016. Given the fact that development is slow in the standard SIP field, this means it's still pretty much up to date.

Unfortunately you'd have to rely on an online translator unless you understand a little German.

Enjoy!


Greetings, and a nice weekend to all of you, Joe

User avatar
galen
Posts: 271
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 1:37 pm

Re: Interesting article about the use of SIP softphones on Linux in company environments

#2 Post by galen »

thanks for the info

I can't get Linphone 3.6.1
to configure on MX18
it reports any port I choose as being in use.
default port 5060

any ideas?
Linux user since 1999, on-line 1993
Dtop#1: XU20 AMD-FX6300, GT730
Dtop#2: MX19 AM3ATH2X2, GT218-8400
Ltop#1: MX21 T500
Ltop#2: MX19 T440
Ltop#3: MX19 NC6400
Ltop#4: XU18 NC4400
Ltop#5: Sparky32 T30 :turtle:
Ltop#6: MX21 Acer E5

User avatar
MX-16_fan
Posts: 331
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 12:09 pm

Re: Interesting article about the use of SIP softphones on Linux in company environments

#3 Post by MX-16_fan »

@galen:
galen wrote: Thu Jul 25, 2019 2:07 pm thanks for the info

I can't get Linphone 3.6.1
to configure on MX18
it reports any port I choose as being in use.
default port 5060

any ideas?

Linphone 3.6.1 has shown to be extremely buggy. Besides, it is extremely outdated. I wouldn't think it's worth wasting your time with it.

4.1.1 is the current stable. If you want to test it, you might file a friendly package request in viewforum.php?f=134.

(There's a Flatpak available, but you probably wouldn't want to go down that road. Besides, you might encounter issues that you wouldn't encounter when running from a generic package.)

Having 4.1.1 available for testing would certainly be a good idea.



Greetings, Joe

User avatar
galen
Posts: 271
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 1:37 pm

Re: Interesting article about the use of SIP softphones on Linux in company environments

#4 Post by galen »

agreed on Linphone 3.6.1 it's log shows it can't open a transport layer,
I guess that means it needs a slew of dependencies like ortp , which wont compile for me

side note:
been trying to get blink working as well
https://ag-projects.com/blink/
repo
http://ag-projects.com/debian stable main
Linux user since 1999, on-line 1993
Dtop#1: XU20 AMD-FX6300, GT730
Dtop#2: MX19 AM3ATH2X2, GT218-8400
Ltop#1: MX21 T500
Ltop#2: MX19 T440
Ltop#3: MX19 NC6400
Ltop#4: XU18 NC4400
Ltop#5: Sparky32 T30 :turtle:
Ltop#6: MX21 Acer E5

User avatar
MX-16_fan
Posts: 331
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 12:09 pm

Re: Interesting article about the use of SIP softphones on Linux in company environments

#5 Post by MX-16_fan »

@galen:
galen wrote: Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:04 pm agreed on Linphone 3.6.1 it's log shows it can't open a transport layer,
I guess that means it needs a slew of dependencies like ortp , which wont compile for me
In case you file a package request (see above), I guess the logs from your package building attempts would be helpful for the repo men.
galen wrote: Thu Jul 25, 2019 11:04 pm side note:
been trying to get blink working as well
https://ag-projects.com/blink/
repo
http://ag-projects.com/debian stable main
Interesting, but I I don't see how this would be Free/Libre Open Source Software (FLOSS)?

By the way, regarding the nature of this thread here, you'd better open a separate thread if you wish to discuss a specific piece of software that hasn't been mentioned in the original posting. In fora, side notes, as interesting as they may be, tend to confuse discussion.


Greetings, and have a nice weekend, Joe

User avatar
galen
Posts: 271
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 1:37 pm

Re: Interesting article about the use of SIP softphones on Linux in company environments

#6 Post by galen »

of note:

jisti desktop
2.10 wont run
2.11 will run and it can access sip accounts: iptel, sip2sip.info linphone etc...

I'm using pidgin for
chat via XMPP servers
LAN file transfers over Bonjour

mumble for music jams
Linux user since 1999, on-line 1993
Dtop#1: XU20 AMD-FX6300, GT730
Dtop#2: MX19 AM3ATH2X2, GT218-8400
Ltop#1: MX21 T500
Ltop#2: MX19 T440
Ltop#3: MX19 NC6400
Ltop#4: XU18 NC4400
Ltop#5: Sparky32 T30 :turtle:
Ltop#6: MX21 Acer E5

User avatar
MX-16_fan
Posts: 331
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 12:09 pm

Re: Interesting article about the use of SIP softphones on Linux in company environments

#7 Post by MX-16_fan »

@galen:
galen wrote: Fri May 01, 2020 1:17 pm of note:

jisti desktop
(...)
2.11 will run and it can access sip accounts: iptel, sip2sip.info linphone etc...
That's great news! Saw your success story here, too: viewtopic.php?f=42&t=51772&p=517712.

Jitsi didn't work for me with MX-16 (viewtopic.php?p=418089#p418089) while it was available via the MX Test Repo (see viewtopic.php?f=97&t=42240&p=415909).

Until now no availability for MX-17.

Apparently difficulties installing in MX-18 (see your package request here: viewtopic.php?f=97&t=57198, and here: viewtopic.php?f=134&t=45888. Maybe you'd wish to bounce your original package request and support the newer one.

galen wrote: Fri May 01, 2020 1:17 pm I'm using pidgin for
(...)
LAN file transfers over Bonjour
(...)
This seems to be rather off-topic here, however very interesting. Maybe you'd wish to open a thread on easy GUI file transfers via LAN? Interesting topic for office work.



Greetings, Joe

Post Reply

Return to “General”