antiX-19-a1-full (64 bit) available

Message
Author
User avatar
dolphin_oracle
Developer
Posts: 20009
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 1:17 pm

Re: antiX-19-a1-full (64 bit) available

#41 Post by dolphin_oracle »

manyroads wrote: Mon Apr 29, 2019 7:57 pm
dolphin_oracle wrote: Mon Apr 29, 2019 7:45 pm further data:

with autologin enabled, the double-login problem does not occur.

on live, with autologin disabled, the double-login problem DOES occur.
It seems to help me with my typing accuracy! :happy: :number1: :bagoverhead:
Edit: Has anyone tried changing from slim to lightdm to see if that clears things up?
I can tell you the problem does not occur with lightdm.
http://www.youtube.com/runwiththedolphin
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.

User avatar
manyroads
Posts: 2623
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2018 6:33 pm

Re: antiX-19-a1-full (64 bit) available

#42 Post by manyroads »

So my old brain says... I should swap out SLIM. I like LightDM better anyway. ;)
Pax vobiscum,
Mark Rabideau - ManyRoads Genealogy -or- eirenicon llc. (geeky stuff)
i3wm, bspwm, hlwm, dwm, spectrwm ~ Linux #449130
"For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong." -- H. L. Mencken

User avatar
dolphin_oracle
Developer
Posts: 20009
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 1:17 pm

Re: antiX-19-a1-full (64 bit) available

#43 Post by dolphin_oracle »

manyroads wrote: Mon Apr 29, 2019 8:11 pm So my old brain says... I should swap out SLIM. I like LightDM better anyway. ;)
perhaps, but slim is integrated with the antiX system in some tight ways. lightdm is not.
http://www.youtube.com/runwiththedolphin
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.

User avatar
manyroads
Posts: 2623
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2018 6:33 pm

Re: antiX-19-a1-full (64 bit) available

#44 Post by manyroads »

dolphin_oracle wrote: Mon Apr 29, 2019 8:12 pm
manyroads wrote: Mon Apr 29, 2019 8:11 pm So my old brain says... I should swap out SLIM. I like LightDM better anyway. ;)
perhaps, but slim is integrated with the antiX system in some tight ways. lightdm is not.
I thought Slim was deprecated/ abandoned... see: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/SLiM
Would it make sense to switch to something that is not abanddoned?
Pax vobiscum,
Mark Rabideau - ManyRoads Genealogy -or- eirenicon llc. (geeky stuff)
i3wm, bspwm, hlwm, dwm, spectrwm ~ Linux #449130
"For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong." -- H. L. Mencken

User avatar
dolphin_oracle
Developer
Posts: 20009
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 1:17 pm

Re: antiX-19-a1-full (64 bit) available

#45 Post by dolphin_oracle »

timkb4cq wrote: Mon Apr 29, 2019 12:36 pm I have an odd, repeatable, startup failure on this alpha.
I made the flash drive with mx-live-usb-maker.
With the normal text scrolling by, changing resolution twice, It boots into a GUI. Looks good. Conky is running. But the session is non-functional. The mouse works - you can open and navigate the menu but nothing you click on (or select & press Enter on) will open.
<Ctrl><Alt><F1> -> login as demo -> startx
That session works but has no wallpaper, conky or desktop icons. I'm typing from it now.

I did test the boot Rescue Entry (had to switch menus first as was indicated) and they work nicely. Was able to boot into (as root) an old forgotten MX-15 partition on my data drive from which the home partition had been wiped and reused for data.

Code: Select all

$ inxi -Fx
System:
  Host: Office Kernel: 4.9.170-antix.1-amd64-smp x86_64 bits: 64 compiler: gcc 
  v: 8.3.0 Desktop: IceWM 1.4.3.0~pre-20181030 
  Distro: antiX-19.a1_x64-full Marielle Franco 27 April 2019 
  base: Debian GNU/Linux buster/sid 
Machine:
  Type: Desktop Mobo: Gigabyte model: GA-78LMT-USB3 R2 v: sex serial: <root required> 
  BIOS: Award v: F1 date: 11/08/2017 
CPU:
  Topology: 6-Core model: AMD FX-6300 bits: 64 type: MCP arch: Bulldozer 
  L2 cache: 2048 KiB 
  flags: lm nx pae sse sse2 sse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 sse4a ssse3 svm bogomips: 42278 
  Speed: 2000 MHz min/max: 1400/3500 MHz Core speeds (MHz): 1: 2000 2: 1400 3: 1400 
  4: 1400 5: 1400 6: 1400 
Graphics:
  Device-1: AMD RS780L [Radeon 3000] vendor: Gigabyte driver: radeon v: kernel 
  bus ID: 01:05.0 
  Display: tty server: X.Org 1.20.3 driver: ati,radeon 
  unloaded: fbdev,modesetting,vesa resolution: 1920x1080~60Hz 
  OpenGL: renderer: AMD RS780 (DRM 2.49.0 / 4.9.170-antix.1-amd64-smp LLVM 7.0.1) 
  v: 3.3 Mesa 18.3.4 direct render: Yes 
Audio:
  Device-1: AMD SBx00 Azalia vendor: Gigabyte driver: snd_hda_intel v: kernel 
  bus ID: 00:14.2 
  Device-2: AMD RS780 HDMI Audio [Radeon 3000/3100 / HD 3200/3300] 
  driver: snd_hda_intel v: kernel bus ID: 01:05.1 
  Device-3: Conexant Systems CX23885 PCI Video and Audio Decoder 
  vendor: Hauppauge works driver: N/A bus ID: 03:00.0 
  Sound Server: ALSA v: k4.9.170-antix.1-amd64-smp 
Network:
  Device-1: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet vendor: Gigabyte 
  driver: r8169 v: 2.3LK-NAPI port: de00 bus ID: 04:00.0 
  IF: eth0 state: up speed: 100 Mbps duplex: full mac: e0:d5:5e:39:93:ac 
Drives:
  Local Storage: total: 2.30 TiB used: 1.13 GiB (0.0%) 
  ID-1: /dev/sda vendor: HP model: SSD S700 500GB size: 465.76 GiB 
  ID-2: /dev/sdb vendor: Western Digital model: WD20EFRX-68EUZN0 size: 1.82 TiB 
  ID-3: /dev/sdc type: USB vendor: Samsung model: Flash Drive size: 29.88 GiB 
Partition:
  ID-1: / size: 5.79 GiB used: 34.4 MiB (0.6%) fs: overlay source: ERR-102 
  ID-2: swap-1 size: 4.00 GiB used: 0 KiB (0.0%) fs: swap dev: /dev/sda2 
  ID-3: swap-2 size: 4.00 GiB used: 0 KiB (0.0%) fs: swap dev: /dev/sdb2 
Sensors:
  System Temperatures: cpu: 29.2 C mobo: N/A 
  Fan Speeds (RPM): N/A 
Info:
  Processes: 176 Uptime: 14m Memory: 7.29 GiB used: 661.3 MiB (8.9%) Init: SysVinit 
  runlevel: 5 Compilers: gcc: 8.3.0 Shell: bash v: 5.0.3 inxi: 3.0.33
tim,

try using the debian testing version of slim. the version on the antiX iso is hosted on antiX. I've been getting better results with the debian testing version.
http://www.youtube.com/runwiththedolphin
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.

User avatar
beardedragon
Posts: 114
Joined: Wed Mar 27, 2019 11:26 pm

Re: antiX-19-a1-full (64 bit) available

#46 Post by beardedragon »

Problem trying to install LightDM, it needs systemd plus you cannot have two login managers running at the same time so one has to go bye bye.
Rule #1 Backup Everything
Rule #2 Read Rule #1

User avatar
dolphin_oracle
Developer
Posts: 20009
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 1:17 pm

Re: antiX-19-a1-full (64 bit) available

#47 Post by dolphin_oracle »

ok, went back to the antiX slim due to some theme stuff that appears to be different, but I took the initscript from debian and am using that. working better...but I haven't been able to test enough to know if its a solution. one thing...slim starts earlier with the debian initscript, maybe too early.
http://www.youtube.com/runwiththedolphin
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.

skidoo
Posts: 753
Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2015 6:56 pm

Re: antiX-19-a1-full (64 bit) available

#48 Post by skidoo »

one thing...slim starts earlier with the debian initscript, maybe too early.
yah, this observation reminds me of one of the tweaks seen in the GalliumOS fork:
https://github.com/GalliumOS-unmaintain ... 34e667381d
app.cpp
App::StartServer()
setpriority(PRIO_PROCESS, ServerPID, -19);
manyroads wrote: Mon Apr 29, 2019 8:18 pm I thought Slim was deprecated/ abandoned... see: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/SLiM
Would it make sense to switch to something that is not abanddoned?
Something like this?
https://github.com/antix-skidoo/slim-antix
We've been using it locally since early '18. Mentioned it here topic/login-manager/#post-5364 but only "rust_collector" and scant few other users seemed interested, so I haven't really promoted its availability.
Last edited by skidoo on Mon Apr 29, 2019 11:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
timkb4cq
Developer
Posts: 3201
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 4:05 pm

Re: antiX-19-a1-full (64 bit) available

#49 Post by timkb4cq »

Thank you. The Buster slim with the antiX slim.conf (the first time I mistakenly let the debian conf file overwrite the antiX version) does work much better. One login - working session.
HP Pavillion TP01, AMD Ryzen 3 5300G (quad core), Crucial 500GB SSD, Toshiba 6TB 7200rpm
Dell Inspiron 15, AMD Ryzen 7 2700u (quad core). Sabrent 500GB nvme, Seagate 1TB

User avatar
figueroa
Posts: 1053
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2018 12:20 am

Re: antiX-19-a1-full (64 bit) available

#50 Post by figueroa »

I won't be that much help, but ISO appears to boot flawlessly in VirtualBox with the same virtual machine settings I use for an installation of MX. Remarkably error free kernel log. EVERYTHING works. Only issue detected is I can play a sound once in a terminal with play /usr/share/sounds/alsa/Front_Center.wav but the second time I try to play a sound the terminal locks up. Doesn't spawn any errors. I can x out of the terminal just fine. That ends sound for that session until I reboot. This problem does not manifest itself in the 17.3 or earlier or MX ISOs. VM sound settings are default ALSA ICH AC97.

Boots much faster than 17.3 ISO. In fact, fastest full ISO I've booted of any distro. Nice piece of work. That's all I have time for right now.
Andy Figueroa
Using Unix from 1984; GNU/Linux from 1993

Post Reply

Return to “antiX”