MX User Manager
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Thu May 16, 2019 7:36 pm
MX User Manager
2019-05-16
I would like to set up a Guest account that would not require a password. Is it possible to do this? Are there risks involved in doing this, even if the Guest account is set up without any privileges?
>)))*>
I would like to set up a Guest account that would not require a password. Is it possible to do this? Are there risks involved in doing this, even if the Guest account is set up without any privileges?
>)))*>
Re: MX User Manager
No. Passwords are required for user authentication.deepestfishguy wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 7:49 pm 2019-05-16
I would like to set up a Guest account that would not require a password. Is it possible to do this?
Yes, extreme risks. Letting an unverified, unvalidated account run at any privilege level would be a very bad thing, security-wise. That's why passwords are a system requirement and always have been in Linux, and in Unix before that.Are there risks involved in doing this, even if the Guest account is set up without any privileges?
Welcome to the forum.
Please read the Forum Rules, How To Ask For Help, How to Break Your System and Don't Break Debian. Always include your full Quick System Info (QSI) with each and every new help request.
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Thu May 16, 2019 7:36 pm
Re: MX User Manager
Thanks so much for your speedy reply !!
Re: MX User Manager
Truly a bad idea... sorry.deepestfishguy wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 7:49 pm 2019-05-16
I would like to set up a Guest account that would not require a password. Is it possible to do this? Are there risks involved in doing this, even if the Guest account is set up without any privileges?
>)))*>
Pax vobiscum,
Mark Rabideau - ManyRoads Genealogy -or- eirenicon llc. (geeky stuff)
i3wm, bspwm, hlwm, dwm, spectrwm ~ Linux #449130
"For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong." -- H. L. Mencken
Mark Rabideau - ManyRoads Genealogy -or- eirenicon llc. (geeky stuff)
i3wm, bspwm, hlwm, dwm, spectrwm ~ Linux #449130
"For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong." -- H. L. Mencken
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Thu May 16, 2019 7:36 pm
Re: MX User Manager
I value your input . . . thanks for a quick reply . . . no need for me to think about this anymore !!
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Thu May 16, 2019 7:36 pm
RSOLVED: MX User Manager
Not sure if it is protocol on this Form to indicate that an issue has been resolved . . . hopefully it is appropriate for me to do so. Cheers !!
>)))*>
>)))*>
Re: RSOLVED: MX User Manager
It is. Add [Solved] to the title of your first post. The pencil at the right top of the post block will put you in editing mode.deepestfishguy wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2019 8:33 pm Not sure if it is protocol on this Form to indicate that an issue has been resolved . . . hopefully it is appropriate for me to do so. Cheers !!
>)))*>
Forum Rules
Guide - How to Ask for Help
richb Administrator
System: MX 23 KDE
AMD A8 7600 FM2+ CPU R7 Graphics, 16 GIG Mem. Three Samsung EVO SSD's 250 GB
Guide - How to Ask for Help
richb Administrator
System: MX 23 KDE
AMD A8 7600 FM2+ CPU R7 Graphics, 16 GIG Mem. Three Samsung EVO SSD's 250 GB
Re: MX User Manager
For my education, could you elaborate?JayM wrote:Yes, extreme risks. Letting an unverified, unvalidated account run at any privilege level would be a very bad thing, security-wise.
Do you assume computer is accessible to strangers physically or via network?
Is autologin even worse?
Thanks for your patience.
Re: MX User Manager
If your PC is plugged into any network... and you have an open account, anyone with access to that network has free and open access to your machine.Vincent17 wrote: ↑Sat May 18, 2019 11:53 amFor my education, could you elaborate?JayM wrote:Yes, extreme risks. Letting an unverified, unvalidated account run at any privilege level would be a very bad thing, security-wise.
Do you assume computer is accessible to strangers physically or via network?
Is autologin even worse?
Thanks for your patience.
Pax vobiscum,
Mark Rabideau - ManyRoads Genealogy -or- eirenicon llc. (geeky stuff)
i3wm, bspwm, hlwm, dwm, spectrwm ~ Linux #449130
"For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong." -- H. L. Mencken
Mark Rabideau - ManyRoads Genealogy -or- eirenicon llc. (geeky stuff)
i3wm, bspwm, hlwm, dwm, spectrwm ~ Linux #449130
"For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong." -- H. L. Mencken
Re: MX User Manager
Vincent17 wrote:
You only have to look at the Windows platform to find your answer. Microsoft wanted Windows (especially the Home versions) to be as user friendly as possible. To that end they eschewed passwords early on in the consumer versions and also made passwords trivial to bypass on the business versions. They also gave their office suite kernel access. Then they rolled out a security protocol which was so strict that every home user had to be an Administrator. The effect of these four policies was to create an environment that enabled a plague of viruses and malware to occur.For my education, could you elaborate?
Do you assume computer is accessible to strangers physically or via network?
Is autologin even worse?
Thanks for your patience.
HP 15; ryzen 3 5300U APU; 500 Gb SSD; 8GB ram
Aspire V5-571; CPU Intel I3; 500 GB SSD; Intel 2nd Gen Graphics; 8 GB Ram
Aspire XC-866; i3-9100; UHD 630; 8 GB ram; 1TB HDD
In Linux, newer isn't always better. The best solution is the one that works.
Aspire V5-571; CPU Intel I3; 500 GB SSD; Intel 2nd Gen Graphics; 8 GB Ram
Aspire XC-866; i3-9100; UHD 630; 8 GB ram; 1TB HDD
In Linux, newer isn't always better. The best solution is the one that works.