Seems to me it is a fix required on Palemoon, not MX, since as you asserted it only occurs with Palemoon.If any fix on MX requires the lack of using a screensaver
MX 17/18 Repository: The Pale Moon Browser Thread
Re: MX 17 Repository: The Pale Moon Browser Thread
Forum Rules
Guide - How to Ask for Help
richb Administrator
System: MX 23 KDE
AMD A8 7600 FM2+ CPU R7 Graphics, 16 GIG Mem. Three Samsung EVO SSD's 250 GB
Guide - How to Ask for Help
richb Administrator
System: MX 23 KDE
AMD A8 7600 FM2+ CPU R7 Graphics, 16 GIG Mem. Three Samsung EVO SSD's 250 GB
Re: MX 17 Repository: The Pale Moon Browser Thread
Curses! Rebuilding now.anticapitalista wrote:stevo - the new deb is labelled mx15.
-
anticapitalista
- Developer
- Posts: 4166
- Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 10:40 am
Re: MX 17 Repository: The Pale Moon Browser Thread
Has the new deb been uploaded to the repo?Stevo wrote:Curses! Rebuilding now.anticapitalista wrote:stevo - the new deb is labelled mx15.
anticapitalista
Reg. linux user #395339.
Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.
antiX with runit - lean and mean.
https://antixlinux.com
Reg. linux user #395339.
Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.
antiX with runit - lean and mean.
https://antixlinux.com
Re: MX 17 Repository: The Pale Moon Browser Thread
I don't see it there...maybe I will have to build a 64-bit version to match it. Let me check with Tim.
Re: MX 17 Repository: The Pale Moon Browser Thread
OK, just uploaded the rebuilt packages: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1yluAA ... sePi-ZrC11
Re: MX 17 Repository: The Pale Moon Browser Thread
Works great in MX/antiX 32/64! Thanks! ur 
Gigabyte Z77M-D3H, Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2 (Quad core), 32GB RAM,
GeForce GTX 770, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 500GB, Seagate Barracuda 4TB
GeForce GTX 770, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 500GB, Seagate Barracuda 4TB
-
Gordon Cooper
- Posts: 965
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2011 5:50 pm
Re: MX 17 Repository: The Pale Moon Browser Thread
Have I missed something? Been using PaleMoon 27.9.1 for several days without any problems.
Backup: Dell9010, MX-19_B2, Win7, 120 SSD, WD 232GIB HD, 4GB RAM
Primary :Homebrew64 bit Intel duo core 2 GB RAM, 120 GB Kingston SSD, Seagate1TB.
MX-18.2 64bit. Also MX17, Kubuntu14.04 & Puppy 6.3.
Primary :Homebrew64 bit Intel duo core 2 GB RAM, 120 GB Kingston SSD, Seagate1TB.
MX-18.2 64bit. Also MX17, Kubuntu14.04 & Puppy 6.3.
Re: MX 17 Repository: The Pale Moon Browser Thread
Yep, the 32bit version did had a unfortunate dependencies issue within the deb. Fixed now by Stevo!Gordon Cooper wrote:Have I missed something? Been using PaleMoon 27.9.1 for several days without any problems.
And by this he had to rebuild the 64bit version also!
Gigabyte Z77M-D3H, Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2 (Quad core), 32GB RAM,
GeForce GTX 770, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 500GB, Seagate Barracuda 4TB
GeForce GTX 770, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 500GB, Seagate Barracuda 4TB
-
Gordon Cooper
- Posts: 965
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2011 5:50 pm
Re: MX 17 Repository: The Pale Moon Browser Thread
Thanks fehlix, am using the 64 bit and was wondering what might be wrong with it. Now I know.
Backup: Dell9010, MX-19_B2, Win7, 120 SSD, WD 232GIB HD, 4GB RAM
Primary :Homebrew64 bit Intel duo core 2 GB RAM, 120 GB Kingston SSD, Seagate1TB.
MX-18.2 64bit. Also MX17, Kubuntu14.04 & Puppy 6.3.
Primary :Homebrew64 bit Intel duo core 2 GB RAM, 120 GB Kingston SSD, Seagate1TB.
MX-18.2 64bit. Also MX17, Kubuntu14.04 & Puppy 6.3.
Re: MX 17 Repository: The Pale Moon Browser Thread
Hello,
FI: I have just tried palemoon 27.9.1 today, and I think that it will be my web browser by default ... I like it, small and efficient right now.
FI: I have just tried palemoon 27.9.1 today, and I think that it will be my web browser by default ... I like it, small and efficient right now.
Pour les nouveaux utilisateurs: Alt+F1 pour le manuel, ou FAQS, MX MANUEL, et Conseils Debian - Info. système “quick-system-info-mx” (QSI) ... Ici: System: MX-19_x64 & antiX19_x32