MX Linux Forum

This could be option 5

https://wiki.debian.org/LTS/Extended

Poster is using antiX which does not have QSI

Do you have a working one to share?

One advantage of installing in a virtual machine, making changes and creating a snapshot is that it is hardware agnostic. If you do the same from a live usb stick, you might be tempted to install various drivers eg nvidia, which will/may cause issues if the newly created iso boots on a box without n...

Compared to the different DE/WMs, there is one WM that can do things of what they can do. This is FVWM because many of them originated from this WM. There are functions that FVWM can do that I have not come across in others, such as using the left-click mouse cursor for 4 different purposes. For ex...

@dolphin_oracle Have you updated the antiX kernels on MXPI?

... but would a rolling release of mx be out of the question to avoid such annoyances every few years to remain a devout mx user?

Yes it is out of the question in its present state as you have discovered.

Interesting discussion. For the first time ever with an antiX release, antiX-23 when released will default to double-click in its file-manager (now zzzFM). This was implemented because some regular users/supporters/contributors have said it is what is expected. Personally speaking, I hate double-cli...

Why would you want to do this? So they could be used on any distro, in a multitude of flexible ways without having to install/remove dependancies. The applications are endless. Think of the ways you use flatpaks or appimages already. Perhaps this is not the best place to ask? Why would MX Linux dev...

try installing alsa-ucm-conf