MX Linux Forum

First thing I do to troubleshoot this kind of things is to move away the ~/.mozilla folder, rename it to something else and try again.

No worries, like I said as long as there are users and Debian supports 32bit (and I don't think they will drop support anytime soon) we'll support it.

I fixed mx-tools, it should not display Xfce-only items if not running in Xfce (Tim will have to upload the new mx-tools in the repo).

Great video. KDE looks good, we should make some changes to MX Tools not to displays irrelevant apps: Defaut Look, Panel Orientation, and Sounds. I'm thinking that we can make sure MX -Tools won't load them if they belong to a "Xfce-only" category (or something like that) when MX-Tools doe...

Great video, thanks D_O for doing it!

R61 seems perfectly capable to run 64-bit.
https://support.lenovo.com/us/en/solutions/pd013965#arc
https://ark.intel.com/products/29759/In ... 00-MHz-FSB

Not sure what's going to be decided about desktop icon, but I think x-www-browser is better because it's a full featured browser where people can see videos, mx-viewer doesn't play videos (I think there's an encoding issue that I haven't yet figured out).

If there were any doubts this thread makes it pretty clear that we'll still need to continue to support 32bit, not sure how other distros (Arch comes to mind) plan to drop the official support.

Macbooks though can do 64bit, right?

How much dev. effort would be saved by ditching 32-bit? That's not why I asked, I was just curious considering Arch move not to support it anymore, from my point of view the effort is minimal, I do the monthly snapshots so there's a bit of duplication to do a 32bit ISO, but it takes me, I don't kno...