[SOLVED] MX-17 package update request: Xfburn

Message
Author
User avatar
MX-16_fan
Posts: 331
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 12:09 pm

Re: MX-17 package update request: Xfburn

#21 Post by MX-16_fan »

@scdbackup:

Do you happen to have a bug reporting account that would be suitable for notifying upstream about the great fix which @Stevo has worked out?


Greetings, Joe

User avatar
Stevo
Developer
Posts: 12774
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:07 pm

Re: MX-17 package update request: Xfburn

#22 Post by Stevo »

It looks like it has a mirror on github:

https://github.com/xfce-mirror/xfburn

User avatar
fehlix
Developer
Posts: 10303
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:09 pm

Re: MX-17 package update request: Xfburn

#23 Post by fehlix »

Stevo wrote: Mon Jul 30, 2018 5:03 pm It looks like it has a mirror on github:

https://github.com/xfce-mirror/xfburn
Thanks, Stevo. I'll have a look to fix this long-string issues there. :bagoverhead:
Gigabyte Z77M-D3H, Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2 (Quad core), 32GB RAM,
GeForce GTX 770, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 500GB, Seagate Barracuda 4TB

User avatar
MX-16_fan
Posts: 331
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 12:09 pm

Re: MX-17 package update request: Xfburn

#24 Post by MX-16_fan »

@fehlix:
fehlix wrote: Mon Jul 30, 2018 5:48 pm(...) I'll have a look to fix this long-string issues there ... .
Thanks for your announcement to get the fix into upstream's code :happy:.

Did getting this into GitHub work out for you? Just asking because I can't see any commit in https://github.com/xfce-mirror/xfburn/tree/xfburn-0.5.5 since December 14th, 2017.

I'd mark this thread here "SOLVED" as soon as I know that Stevo's fix is in upstream.


Greetings, and have a great weekend, Joe

User avatar
fehlix
Developer
Posts: 10303
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:09 pm

Re: MX-17 package update request: Xfburn

#25 Post by fehlix »

MX-16_fan wrote: Sat Aug 11, 2018 5:05 am ...I'd mark this thread here "SOLVED" as soon as I know that Stevo's fix is in upstream.
You might consider to request this change yourself upstream. This would provide you better position to monitor when this fix is applied at github.
Gigabyte Z77M-D3H, Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2 (Quad core), 32GB RAM,
GeForce GTX 770, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 500GB, Seagate Barracuda 4TB

scdbackup
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2015 5:59 am

Re: MX-17 package update request: Xfburn

#26 Post by scdbackup »

Hi,

sorry, i am not affiliated with Xfburn other than being provider of
the libraries libburn and libisofs. My last attempt to contact David
Mohr is a while ago. He might have retired from the project.

But look at https://git.xfce.org/apps/xfburn/log/
There are commit messages not older than 10 days.
Interesting seems to be this header line in each commit:

committer Transifex <noreply@xfce.org>

https://www.transifex.com/blog/2010/xfc ... transifex/ says
"In case you’ve missed it, the Xfce project has been using their
own installation of Transifex to manage their translations online!
Translators can now visit http://translations.xfce.org and keep up
with the action!"

Have a nice day :)

Thomas

User avatar
fehlix
Developer
Posts: 10303
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:09 pm

Re: MX-17 package update request: Xfburn

#27 Post by fehlix »

scdbackup wrote: Sat Aug 11, 2018 11:42 am ...https://www.transifex.com/blog/2010/xfc ... transifex/ says
"In case you’ve missed it, the Xfce project has been using their
own installation of Transifex to manage their translations online!
Translators can now visit http://translations.xfce.org and keep up
with the action!"
@scdbackup, thanks, that was a good hint.
Gigabyte Z77M-D3H, Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2 (Quad core), 32GB RAM,
GeForce GTX 770, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 500GB, Seagate Barracuda 4TB

User avatar
MX-16_fan
Posts: 331
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 12:09 pm

Re: MX-17 package update request: Xfburn

#28 Post by MX-16_fan »

@scdbackup:

Thanks!


@Stevo:
scdbackup wrote: Sat Aug 11, 2018 11:42 am (...) https://www.transifex.com/blog/2010/xfc ... transifex/ says
"In case you’ve missed it, the Xfce project has been using their
own installation of Transifex to manage their translations online!
Translators can now visit http://translations.xfce.org and keep up
with the action!" (...)
Stevo, is your fix a fix to the PO file? If so, I could try to work out how to commit your fix to Transifex.

Would be a some kind of waste if it never got upstream.


Greetings, Joe

User avatar
fehlix
Developer
Posts: 10303
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:09 pm

Re: MX-17 package update request: Xfburn

#29 Post by fehlix »

MX-16_fan wrote: Sat Aug 11, 2018 12:00 pm Stevo, is your fix a fix to the PO file? If so, I could try to work out how to commit your fix to Transifex.
@MX-16_fan , yes you can do it yourself, just register with xfce's transiflex
and enter the correct translations, which have been already fixed for you
with Stevo's and my help. ( see the fixed translation above within this thread)
The PO files and diff shown above will help you how to change the translations.
:puppy:
Gigabyte Z77M-D3H, Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2 (Quad core), 32GB RAM,
GeForce GTX 770, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 500GB, Seagate Barracuda 4TB

User avatar
Stevo
Developer
Posts: 12774
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:07 pm

Re: MX-17 package update request: Xfburn

#30 Post by Stevo »

A patched MX 19 build of 0.5.5 should be in main shortly, as well as 0.6.2 with a refreshed patch in the MX 19 test repo.

Locked

Return to “Package Requests/Status - MX 17/18”