Welcome!
Important information
-- Spectre and Meltdown vulnerabilities
-- Change in MX sources

News
-- MX Linux on social media: here
-- Mepis support still here

Current releases
-- MX-17.1 Final release info here
-- antiX-17 release info here

New users
-- Please read this first, and don't forget to add system and hardware information to posts!
-- Here are the Forum Rules

MX-17 package update request: Xfburn

Message
Author
User avatar
MX-16_fan
Forum Regular
Forum Regular
Posts: 957
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 12:09 pm

Re: MX-17 package update request: Xfburn

#21 Post by MX-16_fan » Mon Jul 30, 2018 4:54 pm

@scdbackup:

Do you happen to have a bug reporting account that would be suitable for notifying upstream about the great fix which @Stevo has worked out?


Greetings, Joe

User avatar
Stevo
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 16283
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:07 pm

Re: MX-17 package update request: Xfburn

#22 Post by Stevo » Mon Jul 30, 2018 5:03 pm

It looks like it has a mirror on github:

https://github.com/xfce-mirror/xfburn

User avatar
fehlix
Forum Guide
Forum Guide
Posts: 1709
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:09 pm

Re: MX-17 package update request: Xfburn

#23 Post by fehlix » Mon Jul 30, 2018 5:48 pm

Stevo wrote:
Mon Jul 30, 2018 5:03 pm
It looks like it has a mirror on github:

https://github.com/xfce-mirror/xfburn
Thanks, Stevo. I'll have a look to fix this long-string issues there. :bagoverhead:
Gigabyte Z77M-D3H, Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2 (Quad core), 32GB RAM,
GeForce GTX 770, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 500GB, Seagate Barracuda 4TB

User avatar
MX-16_fan
Forum Regular
Forum Regular
Posts: 957
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 12:09 pm

Re: MX-17 package update request: Xfburn

#24 Post by MX-16_fan » Sat Aug 11, 2018 5:05 am

@fehlix:
fehlix wrote:
Mon Jul 30, 2018 5:48 pm
(...) I'll have a look to fix this long-string issues there ... .
Thanks for your announcement to get the fix into upstream's code :happy:.

Did getting this into GitHub work out for you? Just asking because I can't see any commit in https://github.com/xfce-mirror/xfburn/tree/xfburn-0.5.5 since December 14th, 2017.

I'd mark this thread here "SOLVED" as soon as I know that Stevo's fix is in upstream.


Greetings, and have a great weekend, Joe

User avatar
fehlix
Forum Guide
Forum Guide
Posts: 1709
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:09 pm

Re: MX-17 package update request: Xfburn

#25 Post by fehlix » Sat Aug 11, 2018 11:09 am

MX-16_fan wrote:
Sat Aug 11, 2018 5:05 am
...I'd mark this thread here "SOLVED" as soon as I know that Stevo's fix is in upstream.
You might consider to request this change yourself upstream. This would provide you better position to monitor when this fix is applied at github.
Gigabyte Z77M-D3H, Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2 (Quad core), 32GB RAM,
GeForce GTX 770, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 500GB, Seagate Barracuda 4TB

scdbackup
Forum Novice
Forum  Novice
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2015 5:59 am

Re: MX-17 package update request: Xfburn

#26 Post by scdbackup » Sat Aug 11, 2018 11:42 am

Hi,

sorry, i am not affiliated with Xfburn other than being provider of
the libraries libburn and libisofs. My last attempt to contact David
Mohr is a while ago. He might have retired from the project.

But look at https://git.xfce.org/apps/xfburn/log/
There are commit messages not older than 10 days.
Interesting seems to be this header line in each commit:

committer Transifex <noreply@xfce.org>

https://www.transifex.com/blog/2010/xfc ... transifex/ says
"In case you’ve missed it, the Xfce project has been using their
own installation of Transifex to manage their translations online!
Translators can now visit http://translations.xfce.org and keep up
with the action!"

Have a nice day :)

Thomas

User avatar
fehlix
Forum Guide
Forum Guide
Posts: 1709
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:09 pm

Re: MX-17 package update request: Xfburn

#27 Post by fehlix » Sat Aug 11, 2018 11:57 am

scdbackup wrote:
Sat Aug 11, 2018 11:42 am
...https://www.transifex.com/blog/2010/xfc ... transifex/ says
"In case you’ve missed it, the Xfce project has been using their
own installation of Transifex to manage their translations online!
Translators can now visit http://translations.xfce.org and keep up
with the action!"
@scdbackup, thanks, that was a good hint.
Gigabyte Z77M-D3H, Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2 (Quad core), 32GB RAM,
GeForce GTX 770, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 500GB, Seagate Barracuda 4TB

User avatar
MX-16_fan
Forum Regular
Forum Regular
Posts: 957
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 12:09 pm

Re: MX-17 package update request: Xfburn

#28 Post by MX-16_fan » Sat Aug 11, 2018 12:00 pm

@scdbackup:

Thanks!


@Stevo:
scdbackup wrote:
Sat Aug 11, 2018 11:42 am
(...) https://www.transifex.com/blog/2010/xfc ... transifex/ says
"In case you’ve missed it, the Xfce project has been using their
own installation of Transifex to manage their translations online!
Translators can now visit http://translations.xfce.org and keep up
with the action!" (...)
Stevo, is your fix a fix to the PO file? If so, I could try to work out how to commit your fix to Transifex.

Would be a some kind of waste if it never got upstream.


Greetings, Joe

User avatar
fehlix
Forum Guide
Forum Guide
Posts: 1709
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:09 pm

Re: MX-17 package update request: Xfburn

#29 Post by fehlix » Sat Aug 11, 2018 12:26 pm

MX-16_fan wrote:
Sat Aug 11, 2018 12:00 pm
Stevo, is your fix a fix to the PO file? If so, I could try to work out how to commit your fix to Transifex.
@MX-16_fan , yes you can do it yourself, just register with xfce's transiflex
and enter the correct translations, which have been already fixed for you
with Stevo's and my help. ( see the fixed translation above within this thread)
The PO files and diff shown above will help you how to change the translations.
:puppy:
Gigabyte Z77M-D3H, Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2 (Quad core), 32GB RAM,
GeForce GTX 770, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 500GB, Seagate Barracuda 4TB

Post Reply

Return to “Package Requests/Status - MX 17”