Welcome!

The kernel problem with recent updates has been solved. Find the solution here

Important information
-- Required MX 15/16 Repository Changes
-- Information on torrent hosting changes
-- Information on MX15/16 GPG Keys
-- Spectre and Meltdown vulnerabilities

News
-- Introducing our new Website
-- MX Linux on social media: here

Current releases
-- MX-18.3 Point Release release info here
-- Migration Information to MX-18 here
-- antiX-17.4.1 release info here

New users
-- Please read this first, and don't forget to add system and hardware information to posts!
-- Here are the Forum Rules

Just saw dolphin's blog post on systemd-shim

User avatar
Jerry3904
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 24965
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:13 am

Re: Just saw dolphin's blog post on systemd-shim

#11

Post by Jerry3904 » Mon May 06, 2019 11:56 am

not sure how much more work that would entail
a whole lot...
Production: 4.15.0-1-amd64, MX-17.1, AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core, GeForce GT 630/PCIe/SSE2, 8 GB, SSD 120 GB, Data 1TB
Testing: AAO 722: 4.15.0-1-386. MX-17.1, AMD C-60 APU, 4 GB
Personal: XPS 13, 4.18.0-19.3-liquorix, 4 GB

User avatar
anticapitalista
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 6258
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 10:40 am

Re: Just saw dolphin's blog post on systemd-shim

#12

Post by anticapitalista » Mon May 06, 2019 12:11 pm

rasat wrote:
Mon May 06, 2019 11:18 am
Same as KBD. I hope MX can keep both sysvinit and systemd in same iso. Not only for user choice, but also as security option. There are/were cases when either one fails during booting. In my case with earlier kernel version running in Dell inspiron 5567.
KBD wrote:
Mon May 06, 2019 11:38 am
If it turns out to be impossible to use the shim in Buster, I'd suggest either detailed instructions in the wiki for installing systemd on the next MX based on Buster, or, if possible, an option in MX Tools to run a script that installs systemd for users that need it.
Edit: I'd suggest two ISO options for the next Buster-based MX, one for sysVinit, one for systemd, but not sure how much more work that would entail.
It IS impossible (at the moment)
anticapitalista
Reg. linux user #395339.

Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.

antiX-17 "Heather Heyer" - lean and mean.
https://antixlinux.com

User avatar
uncle mark
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 5029
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 10:42 pm

Re: Just saw dolphin's blog post on systemd-shim

#13

Post by uncle mark » Mon May 06, 2019 12:35 pm

Sometimes in life -- and in Linux -- you just don't have a choice. systemd is what is being adopted going forward throughout Linuxdom. Sure, niche distros will stick to their never-systemd guns, but they will remain niche distros. Unless a solution can be found that can be maintained for the long term, now may be the time to relent and move on.
Desktop: Custom build Asus/AMD/nVidia -- MEPIS 11
Laptop: Acer Aspire 5250 -- MX-15
Assorted junk: assorted Linuxes

User avatar
baldyeti
Forum Regular
Forum Regular
Posts: 206
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 4:37 pm

Re: Just saw dolphin's blog post on systemd-shim

#14

Post by baldyeti » Mon May 06, 2019 12:49 pm

Is it worth it for MX to sponsor or take over systemd-shim maintenance ? How many debian subsystems/services will ship with properly tested (sysV)init scripts going forward ?

What are the implications of switching to systemd for antiX and MX (i seem to recall this may break the live features ?) Would it be more work to port the antiX live system to systemd ?

Sorry, i only have questions, probably like most users. Either way i am afraid there is going to be extra work for the developers to support buster.
Last edited by baldyeti on Mon May 06, 2019 1:26 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Jan K.
Forum Novice
Forum  Novice
Posts: 43
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2019 8:52 am

Re: Just saw dolphin's blog post on systemd-shim

#15

Post by Jan K. » Mon May 06, 2019 1:06 pm

systemD is definitely not something I want to see between me and the kernel... :bagoverhead:

And really wish MX Linux would stop supporting it... not to debate, just delivering my opinion. :biggrin:

User avatar
KBD
Forum Guide
Forum Guide
Posts: 1721
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2011 7:52 pm

Re: Just saw dolphin's blog post on systemd-shim

#16

Post by KBD » Mon May 06, 2019 1:50 pm

Jerry3904 wrote:
Mon May 06, 2019 11:56 am
not sure how much more work that would entail
a whole lot...
That's what I figured, so didn't mention it as a first option.

User avatar
timkb4cq
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 5048
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 4:05 pm

Re: Just saw dolphin's blog post on systemd-shim

#17

Post by timkb4cq » Mon May 06, 2019 1:52 pm

baldyeti wrote:
Mon May 06, 2019 12:49 pm
Is it worth it for MX to sponsor or take over systemd-shim maintenance ? How many debian subsystems/services will ship with properly tested (sysV)init scripts going forward ?
The systemd devs have already broken systemd-shim, are likely to break it again if development is resumed (since they really want systemd at PID 1) and we don't have the developers familiar enough with the internals of systemd to do that development ourselves.

Using systemd-shim doesn't help with init scripts. We would still have to deal with that issue either way.
MSI 970A-G43 MB, AMD FX-6300 (six core), 16GB RAM, GeForce 730, Samsung 850 EVO 250GB SSD, Seagate Barracuda XT 3TB

User avatar
ChrisUK
Forum Regular
Forum Regular
Posts: 279
Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2017 1:04 pm

Re: Just saw dolphin's blog post on systemd-shim

#18

Post by ChrisUK » Mon May 06, 2019 2:06 pm

Apart from a few active forum users (including devs), I doubt many of the 1000s of MX Linux users even know what systemd is, let alone have the knowledge to argue for it's inclusion/exclusion etc. So, I'll trust the Antix/MX team to do whatever they need to do to maintain the level of stability/reliability (and a few more ***ity's, security/simplicity/usability... etc ;) ), that keeps many, including myself, using both Distros (bearing in mind any restrictions forced upon Antix/MX by decisions made by Debian).

So, as The Four Tops once sang; "Do what you gotta do..." (Yes, I'm that old that I remember The Four Tops ;) )
Chris

MX 18 - Manjaro

User avatar
dreamer
Forum Regular
Forum Regular
Posts: 459
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2017 11:34 am

Re: Just saw dolphin's blog post on systemd-shim

#19

Post by dreamer » Mon May 06, 2019 4:37 pm

Fork Debian Stretch and become independent, smaller (number of packages) and rolling (you already are sort of). If PCLOS can do it... :footinmouth:

PS I don't know what is right for MX Linux so I just throw suggestions at the wall... :puppy:

User avatar
manyroads
Forum Guide
Forum Guide
Posts: 1637
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2018 6:33 pm

Re: Just saw dolphin's blog post on systemd-shim

#20

Post by manyroads » Mon May 06, 2019 5:56 pm

In one of my more unpopular posts/ questions here I asked if it wouldn't make sense to build future releases off of Devuan, rather than Debian, if staying systemd-free was essential. I'll repeat the question, put on my helmet & flak jacket and duck for cover. :eek: :anispider2:

Edit: Or perhaps offer two flavors of MX (Devuan and Debian) thus leaving the systemd non-systemd efforts to the respective root OS team(s).
"Don't believe everything you think."
Pax vobiscum,
Mark Rabideau - http://many-roads.com - Reg. Linux User #449130
bspwm MX-18.3 kernel: 5.1.11-antix.1-amd64-smp
Dell Latitude E5470
Intel i5-6300U~24GB RAM ~ SSD: 1TB
Coding since 1974

Post Reply

Return to “General”