Conky suggestion for MX 17

Report Bugs, Issues and non- package Requests
Message
Author
User avatar
richb
Administrator
Posts: 10348
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:17 pm

Re: Conky suggestion for MX 17

#21 Post by richb »

Jerry3904 wrote:up/down
Thanks. But what is an up/down internet data collection? Does it mean a set of conkies downloaded from the internet? Acronyms drive me crazy.:confused:
Forum Rules
Guide - How to Ask for Help

richb Administrator
System: MX 23 KDE
AMD A8 7600 FM2+ CPU R7 Graphics, 16 GIG Mem. Three Samsung EVO SSD's 250 GB

User avatar
Jerry3904
Administrator
Posts: 21962
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:13 am

Re: Conky suggestion for MX 17

#22 Post by Jerry3904 »

Just internet traffic.
Production: 5.10, MX-23 Xfce, AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core, GeForce GT 630/PCIe/SSE2, 16 GB, SSD 120 GB, Data 1TB
Personal: Lenovo X1 Carbon with MX-23 Fluxbox and Windows 10
Other: Raspberry Pi 5 with MX-23 Xfce Raspberry Pi Respin

User avatar
Stevo
Developer
Posts: 12842
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:07 pm

Re: Conky suggestion for MX 17

#23 Post by Stevo »

richb wrote:
Jerry3904 wrote:up/down
Thanks. But what is an up/down internet data collection? Does it mean a set of conkies downloaded from the internet? Acronyms drive me crazy.:confused:
I have to change the interface for wireless on my machine by a digit. I think that may be more the rule than the exception now with these predictable interface names, unless somehow we can determine the interfaces with a script and have conky use the output.

How about adding buttons to MX-Conky to:

1. Launch conky-manager: (needs the 2.4 CM ported from MX 17 to 15/16, I already have it configured to replace CM 2 2.3)

2. Backup the current contents of ~/.conky and restore the default conkies from mx-conky-data. Also helps with testing upgrades of the -data package.

3. Restore the backed up versions

User avatar
richb
Administrator
Posts: 10348
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:17 pm

Re: Conky suggestion for MX 17

#24 Post by richb »

Jerry3904 wrote:Just internet traffic.
Ah ha the interface designation.
Forum Rules
Guide - How to Ask for Help

richb Administrator
System: MX 23 KDE
AMD A8 7600 FM2+ CPU R7 Graphics, 16 GIG Mem. Three Samsung EVO SSD's 250 GB

User avatar
Stevo
Developer
Posts: 12842
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:07 pm

Re: Conky suggestion for MX 17

#25 Post by Stevo »

This little bit of code shows available net interfaces:

Code: Select all

ls /sys/class/net/ | sed '/lo/d'
from this guide, maybe we can add something to replace eth0 and wlan0 with the outputs of the command:
https://asanka-abeyweera.blogspot.com/2 ... twork.html

User avatar
Jerry3904
Administrator
Posts: 21962
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:13 am

Re: Conky suggestion for MX 17

#26 Post by Jerry3904 »

You obviously haven't looked at the Help file either...

:p
Production: 5.10, MX-23 Xfce, AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core, GeForce GT 630/PCIe/SSE2, 16 GB, SSD 120 GB, Data 1TB
Personal: Lenovo X1 Carbon with MX-23 Fluxbox and Windows 10
Other: Raspberry Pi 5 with MX-23 Xfce Raspberry Pi Respin

User avatar
richb
Administrator
Posts: 10348
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:17 pm

Re: Conky suggestion for MX 17

#27 Post by richb »

Jerry3904 wrote:You obviously haven't looked at the Help file either...

:p
Made that same mistake once. Suggestion, the help file text is so small as to be unreadable on an hdpi screen. Can a link to show in the default browser be added?
Forum Rules
Guide - How to Ask for Help

richb Administrator
System: MX 23 KDE
AMD A8 7600 FM2+ CPU R7 Graphics, 16 GIG Mem. Three Samsung EVO SSD's 250 GB

User avatar
Stevo
Developer
Posts: 12842
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:07 pm

Re: Conky suggestion for MX 17

#28 Post by Stevo »

Jerry3904 wrote:You obviously haven't looked at the Help file either...

:p
Actually, I did, and know you tried to have a common interface in there, but it did not apply in my case.

I'm inspired by that Youtube reviewer that didn't read docs either and just randomly clicked Conky stuff--then also replaced my carefully crafted compiz-reloaded with Stretch's 0.9.13 by force because its version was biggerer and betterer. Then he was mystified by his compiz trouble. It would be cool if the conky widgets could just automatically discover the interfaces...

User avatar
colin_b
Posts: 452
Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2017 7:21 pm

Re: Conky suggestion for MX 17

#29 Post by colin_b »

It would be cool if the conky widgets could just automatically discover the interfaces...
I agree. A lot of people go to the help file as a last resort (me included).

This thread was started by a video review. If the Conky works in its entirety out of the box then all subsequent video reviews which cover MX Conky will have no problems, and MX Linux could get praise for things working without any need for setup.

If, on the other hand, someone can't figure out how to set up Conky in a video review, and they don't consider the help file, then it doesn't look so good.
Last edited by colin_b on Tue Nov 14, 2017 12:25 am, edited 3 times in total.

User avatar
Stevo
Developer
Posts: 12842
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:07 pm

Re: Conky suggestion for MX 17

#30 Post by Stevo »

richb wrote:
Jerry3904 wrote:You obviously haven't looked at the Help file either...

:p
Made that same mistake once. Suggestion, the help file text is so small as to be unreadable on an hdpi screen. Can a link to show in the default browser be added?
<Shift><+> should make the text bigger in the viewer.

Post Reply

Return to “Bugs and Non-Package Requests Forum”