Welcome!
Important information
-- Spectre and Meltdown vulnerabilities
-- Change in MX sources

News
-- MX Linux on social media: here
-- Mepis support still here

Current releases
-- MX-17.1 Final release info here
-- antiX-17 release info here

New users
-- Please read this first, and don't forget to add system and hardware information to posts!
-- Here are the Forum Rules

Tox as a Skype replacement?

Report Bugs, Issues and non- pacakage Requests
Message
Author
User avatar
colin_b
Forum Regular
Forum Regular
Posts: 366
Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2017 7:21 pm

Tox as a Skype replacement?

#1 Post by colin_b » Sun Jul 02, 2017 7:18 pm

Skype 4.3 has been discontinued for Linux http://windowsreport.com/skype-for-linux/

Has anyone tried Tox https://www.linux.com/learn/tox-your-ne ... pplication?

It looks like a good replacement.

One of its benefits over Skype is it is far more secure.

Methinks uTox could be a useful open source addition to MX Linux, and it wouldn't add bloat.

https://tox.chat/clients.html

skidoo
Forum Regular
Forum Regular
Posts: 886
Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2015 6:56 pm

Re: Tox as a Skype replacement?

#2 Post by skidoo » Mon Jul 03, 2017 1:50 am

Methinks uTox
Have you tested both uTox and qTox, and you prefer uTox?
https://github.com/uTox/uTox
https://github.com/qTox/qTox
Asking because back last Fall, I tested both; each had separate merits / strong points. (I would have been unable to choose one over the other.)

User avatar
penguin
Forum Regular
Forum Regular
Posts: 274
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 3:15 pm

Re: Tox as a Skype replacement?

#3 Post by penguin » Mon Jul 03, 2017 6:22 am

Some times ago i read that Jitsi can be Linux replacement of Skype.

Code: Select all

https://jitsi.org/what-is-jitsi/

User avatar
Jerry3904
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 22631
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:13 am

Re: Tox as a Skype replacement?

#4 Post by Jerry3904 » Mon Jul 03, 2017 6:48 am

Jitsi is in our repos and that's what we recommend in the Users Manual based on forum feedback about alternatives to Skype. I have intended for a long time to test it with a Skype user, and will get to it in the next couple of days.
Production: 4.15.0-1-amd64, MX-17.1, AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core, GeForce GT 630/PCIe/SSE2, 8 GB, Kingston SSD 120 GB and WesternDigital 1TB
Testing: AAO 722: 4.15.0-1-386. MX-17.1, AMD C-60 APU, 4 GB

User avatar
dirkme
Forum Novice
Forum  Novice
Posts: 100
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 9:47 pm

Re: Tox as a Skype replacement?

#5 Post by dirkme » Mon Jul 03, 2017 12:09 pm

waiting for your test results :happy:

User avatar
Jerry3904
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 22631
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:13 am

Re: Tox as a Skype replacement?

#6 Post by Jerry3904 » Mon Jul 03, 2017 12:19 pm

Production: 4.15.0-1-amd64, MX-17.1, AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core, GeForce GT 630/PCIe/SSE2, 8 GB, Kingston SSD 120 GB and WesternDigital 1TB
Testing: AAO 722: 4.15.0-1-386. MX-17.1, AMD C-60 APU, 4 GB

User avatar
GuiGuy
Forum Guide
Forum Guide
Posts: 1440
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 6:29 pm

Re: Tox as a Skype replacement?

#7 Post by GuiGuy » Mon Jul 03, 2017 1:37 pm

Just now (on 3rd July) made two video calls with my skype 4.3.0.37-1 : no problems.
What is the truth?

User avatar
Eadwine Rose
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 6096
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:10 am

Re: Tox as a Skype replacement?

#8 Post by Eadwine Rose » Mon Jul 03, 2017 2:01 pm

Hrm.. figured I'd give it a go.. and it's (4.3.0.37) running like normal. Haven't made a call yet, but I am pretty sure that will work as well.
MX-17.1_x64 Horizon 14-3-2018 * 4.15.0-1-amd64 ext4 Xfce 4.12.3 * AMD Asus M4A785TD-V EVO AM3 * ASUS GF GT640-1GD5-L NVIDIA 384.130 * AMD Proc. Athl II X4 635, sAM3 * HDA ATI SB VT1708S An * 2x4Gb DDR3 1600 Kingst * 22" Samsung SyncM P2250 * HP F2280

User avatar
colin_b
Forum Regular
Forum Regular
Posts: 366
Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2017 7:21 pm

Re: Tox as a Skype replacement?

#9 Post by colin_b » Mon Jul 03, 2017 8:33 pm

Oops, I seem to have created a bit of a kerfuffle. :duh:

Last week I was listening to a talk radio show and someone phoned in and heaped praise on Tox after mentioning that Skype was being discontinued on Linux. I simply thought I'd give Tox a mention as its uTox client is ultra lightweight.
https://tox.chat/clients.html µTox is the lightweight client with minimal dependencies; it not only looks pretty, it runs fast!
I haven't tried it, I simply thought it might be a useful addition to the repositories.

User avatar
Jerry3904
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 22631
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:13 am

Re: Tox as a Skype replacement?

#10 Post by Jerry3904 » Mon Jul 03, 2017 8:40 pm

No kerfuffle at all, people just trying to understand the situation. The 4.3 Skype had lots of problems for lots of people.
Production: 4.15.0-1-amd64, MX-17.1, AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core, GeForce GT 630/PCIe/SSE2, 8 GB, Kingston SSD 120 GB and WesternDigital 1TB
Testing: AAO 722: 4.15.0-1-386. MX-17.1, AMD C-60 APU, 4 GB

Post Reply

Return to “Bugs and Non-Package Requests Forum”