MX Linux and ATI

Message
Author
User avatar
dreamofdestinyua
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2018 6:46 am

MX Linux and ATI

#1 Post by dreamofdestinyua »

Do you plan to introduce a normal tool for semi-automatic installation of drivers for ATI in MX Linux as well as for Nvidia?

User avatar
Head_on_a_Stick
Posts: 919
Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2019 3:37 pm

Re: MX Linux and ATI

#2 Post by Head_on_a_Stick »

The open source amdgpu driver is much better than the "pro" (proprietary) version for 3D games:

http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=27266
mod note: Signature removed, please read the forum rules

User avatar
Stevo
Developer
Posts: 12843
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:07 pm

Re: MX Linux and ATI

#3 Post by Stevo »

So, in short, no.

They are already installed!

User avatar
dreamofdestinyua
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2018 6:46 am

Re: MX Linux and ATI

#4 Post by dreamofdestinyua »

Does it work so well on ALL modern ATI video cards?

User avatar
vtvbreech
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2018 8:49 am

Re: MX Linux and ATI

#5 Post by vtvbreech »

dreamofdestinyua wrote: Thu Jul 25, 2019 9:05 am Does it work so well on ALL modern ATI video cards?
ATI was purchased by AMD in 2006 so all of the modern cards are actually AMD. That said, the open source driver is recommended for most use cases and is already in the kernel so there is no need to download a proprietary driver. All of the computers at my house use AMD cpu's and gpu's from various years and all run fine on the open AMDGPU driver.
ThinkPad X220-Core i7 2640M, Samsung Evo 860 500GB
MX 18.3 Continuum

User avatar
dreamofdestinyua
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2018 6:46 am

Re: MX Linux and ATI

#6 Post by dreamofdestinyua »

It's not just about image quality, but about performance in 3d applications. Is it not inferior to the proprietary driver?

User avatar
timkb4cq
Developer
Posts: 3207
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 4:05 pm

Re: MX Linux and ATI

#7 Post by timkb4cq »

From the tests I've read, the open-source amdgpu driver has had better 3d performance than the "pro" version Linux for over a year now.

The only reason to use the amdgpu-pro driver is to use OpenCL programs which use your video card as a cpu instead of a gpu to speed up tasks like bitcoin mining.
HP Pavillion TP01, AMD Ryzen 3 5300G (quad core), Crucial 500GB SSD, Toshiba 6TB 7200rpm
Dell Inspiron 15, AMD Ryzen 7 2700u (quad core). Sabrent 500GB nvme, Seagate 1TB

User avatar
dreamofdestinyua
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2018 6:46 am

Re: MX Linux and ATI

#8 Post by dreamofdestinyua »

Many thanks for clarifying!

User avatar
Stevo
Developer
Posts: 12843
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:07 pm

Re: MX Linux and ATI

#9 Post by Stevo »

Since AMD continually releases new cards, the drivers in MX, which consist of parts in the kernel, Mesa, and the xserver-xorg-video-radeon/ati/amdgpu packages, and also need firmware-amd-graphics, may take some time to support the very very latest models.

But that's what Arch is for.

User avatar
gsm
Posts: 120
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2018 10:16 am

Re: MX Linux and ATI

#10 Post by gsm »

3D Train Studio runs on ArcoLinux with Wine, on my machine with an old Radeon HD 6450/7450/8450.
It does not run on MX Linux 18.3 with WIne or with Wine staging.

Error message:
We could not find any compatible graphics card for display.
No support for DirectX 9.0C and at least shader version 3.0

Remark: Picasa 3 runs fine on both MX Linux and ArcoLinux.

Does ArcoLinux use the proprietary driver or could there be another reason?

Post Reply

Return to “General”