MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

Locked
Message
Author
User avatar
BitJam
Developer
Posts: 2283
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 11:36 pm

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

#141 Post by BitJam »

The problem is that optirun is looking for a command, not an environment variable. Quotes won't help but this might work:

Code: Select all

vblank_mode=0 optirun  glxgears
"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself -- and you are the easiest person to fool."

-- Richard Feynman

User avatar
vamsi
Posts: 151
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2017 2:50 am

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

#142 Post by vamsi »

ferlop wrote:I have installed MX-16.1 (September) and runs pretty well. Indeed, it is a very good distro. Two days ago I tried live MX-17 B1 (and before a4 and a5) and noticed that ram consumption is much higher than MX-16.1 live. Why is that? It can be explained? Thanks.
Me too experienced my system is slow after installing mx-17 beta on my pc and reverted back to MX- 16.1 may be due to alpha version i think so or may be my hardware species are becoming old but in mx-16.1 i din't found any lagging :happy:

User avatar
richb
Administrator
Posts: 10348
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:17 pm

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

#143 Post by richb »

kmathern wrote:
richb wrote:
kmathern wrote:
Try:

Code: Select all

optirun vblank_mode=0 glxgears

Must be an error in the code

Code: Select all

[ 1939.715915] [ERROR]Error running "vblank_mode=0": No such file or directory
The vblank_mode=0 thing works for me without the optirun part (don't have a Nvidia GPU), maybe try putting some quotes around it:

Code: Select all

 optirun 'vblank_mode=0 glxgears'
Does not work with optirun but does alone.
Forum Rules
Guide - How to Ask for Help

richb Administrator
System: MX 23 KDE
AMD A8 7600 FM2+ CPU R7 Graphics, 16 GIG Mem. Three Samsung EVO SSD's 250 GB

User avatar
kmathern
Developer
Posts: 2409
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:26 pm

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

#144 Post by kmathern »

richb wrote:Does not work with optirun but does alone.
Did you try BitJam's way ?

User avatar
Stevo
Developer
Posts: 12842
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:07 pm

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

#145 Post by Stevo »

kmathern wrote:
richb wrote:Does not work with optirun but does alone.
Did you try BitJam's way ?
That command to disable the refresh sync only works on xorg drivers like Intel and maybe the xorg AMD drivers. The correct syntax for the Nvidia nonfree driver is

Code: Select all

__GL_SYNC_TO_VBLANK=1 optirun glxgears
But glxgears is not a good benchmark, and will show a lower rate for the Nvidia card for reasons that seem related to Bumblebee overhead. The Unigine benchmarks show better frame rates for my Nvidia GPU.

One benchmark that works a lot better is to install virtualgl and use glxspheres on 32-bit and glxspheres64 on 64, but I still have to build it for MX 17...the way I quick-check if Bumblebee is working is

Code: Select all

inxi -G
vs

Code: Select all

optirun inxi -G
Last edited by Stevo on Thu Nov 09, 2017 6:13 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
richb
Administrator
Posts: 10348
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:17 pm

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

#146 Post by richb »

Code: Select all

optirun inxi -G
Graphics:  Card-1: Intel 3rd Gen Core processor Graphics Controller
           Card-2: NVIDIA GF117M [GeForce 610M/710M/810M/820M / GT 620M/625M/630M/720M]
           Display Server: x11 (X.Org 1.19.2 ) drivers: modesetting (unloaded: fbdev,vesa)
           Resolution: 1366x768@59.99hz
           OpenGL: renderer: GeForce GT 720M/PCIe/SSE2 version: 4.5.0 NVIDIA 375.82
That is what I would expect to see for the OpenGL renderer. So it looks like everything is as expected.
I did not see Bitjam's solution until now. That did indeed work. And the result is an order of magnitude increase in frame rate, from about 60 fps to 1000 fps
Forum Rules
Guide - How to Ask for Help

richb Administrator
System: MX 23 KDE
AMD A8 7600 FM2+ CPU R7 Graphics, 16 GIG Mem. Three Samsung EVO SSD's 250 GB

User avatar
Stevo
Developer
Posts: 12842
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:07 pm

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

#147 Post by Stevo »

But isn't that 1000 fps a lot slower than the integrated GPU? My Intel GPU shows a 10X better framerate!

Here is the latest virtualgl: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1GEVdo ... mBjoYDMKec

You only need to install the virtualgl deb for your release and architecture, then you get the glxspheres benchmark on 32 and glxspheres64 on 64-bit. They show the Nvidia GPU as faster without that VBLANK setting...

User avatar
richb
Administrator
Posts: 10348
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:17 pm

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

#148 Post by richb »

Stevo wrote:But isn't that 1000 fps a lot slower than the integrated GPU?
No it is 60 for the integrated intel.
Here is the latest virtualgl: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1GEVdo ... mBjoYDMKec

You only need to install the virtualgl deb for your release and architecture, then you get the glxspheres benchmark on 32 and glxspheres64 on 64-bit.
Thanks. I am not on the laptop right now. But will get it when I am. By the way I remembered glxspheres is a better comparison. It will be interesting to see how that fares.
Forum Rules
Guide - How to Ask for Help

richb Administrator
System: MX 23 KDE
AMD A8 7600 FM2+ CPU R7 Graphics, 16 GIG Mem. Three Samsung EVO SSD's 250 GB

User avatar
richb
Administrator
Posts: 10348
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:17 pm

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

#149 Post by richb »

richb wrote:
Stevo wrote:But isn't that 1000 fps a lot slower than the integrated GPU?
No it is 60 for the integrated intel.
Here is the latest virtualgl: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1GEVdo ... mBjoYDMKec

You only need to install the virtualgl deb for your release and architecture, then you get the glxspheres benchmark on 32 and glxspheres64 on 64-bit.
Thanks. I am not on the laptop right now. But will get it when I am. By the way I remembered glxspheres is a better comparison. It will be interesting to see how that fares.
Similar numbers with glxspheres64
Forum Rules
Guide - How to Ask for Help

richb Administrator
System: MX 23 KDE
AMD A8 7600 FM2+ CPU R7 Graphics, 16 GIG Mem. Three Samsung EVO SSD's 250 GB

User avatar
ldsemerchen
Posts: 34
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2017 10:17 am

Re: MX-17 Beta 1 Feedback Thread

#150 Post by ldsemerchen »

entropyfoe wrote:ldsemerchen

Is there an hdmi sound card or device showing?

Sometimes those need to be turned off or de-selected.
No hdmi sound card. I found something strange: Some program (for ex. Telegram) ran but I couldn't change it's output device to USB earphones but some could (for ex. Clementine).
Image

Locked

Return to “General”