Code: Select all
vblank_mode=0 optirun glxgears
Code: Select all
vblank_mode=0 optirun glxgears
Me too experienced my system is slow after installing mx-17 beta on my pc and reverted back to MX- 16.1 may be due to alpha version i think so or may be my hardware species are becoming old but in mx-16.1 i din't found any laggingferlop wrote:I have installed MX-16.1 (September) and runs pretty well. Indeed, it is a very good distro. Two days ago I tried live MX-17 B1 (and before a4 and a5) and noticed that ram consumption is much higher than MX-16.1 live. Why is that? It can be explained? Thanks.
Does not work with optirun but does alone.kmathern wrote:The vblank_mode=0 thing works for me without the optirun part (don't have a Nvidia GPU), maybe try putting some quotes around it:richb wrote:kmathern wrote:
Try:Code: Select all
optirun vblank_mode=0 glxgears
Must be an error in the codeCode: Select all
[ 1939.715915] [ERROR]Error running "vblank_mode=0": No such file or directory
Code: Select all
optirun 'vblank_mode=0 glxgears'
Did you try BitJam's way ?richb wrote:Does not work with optirun but does alone.
That command to disable the refresh sync only works on xorg drivers like Intel and maybe the xorg AMD drivers. The correct syntax for the Nvidia nonfree driver iskmathern wrote:Did you try BitJam's way ?richb wrote:Does not work with optirun but does alone.
Code: Select all
__GL_SYNC_TO_VBLANK=1 optirun glxgears
Code: Select all
inxi -G
Code: Select all
optirun inxi -G
Code: Select all
optirun inxi -G
Graphics: Card-1: Intel 3rd Gen Core processor Graphics Controller
Card-2: NVIDIA GF117M [GeForce 610M/710M/810M/820M / GT 620M/625M/630M/720M]
Display Server: x11 (X.Org 1.19.2 ) drivers: modesetting (unloaded: fbdev,vesa)
Resolution: 1366x768@59.99hz
OpenGL: renderer: GeForce GT 720M/PCIe/SSE2 version: 4.5.0 NVIDIA 375.82
No it is 60 for the integrated intel.Stevo wrote:But isn't that 1000 fps a lot slower than the integrated GPU?
Thanks. I am not on the laptop right now. But will get it when I am. By the way I remembered glxspheres is a better comparison. It will be interesting to see how that fares.Here is the latest virtualgl: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1GEVdo ... mBjoYDMKec
You only need to install the virtualgl deb for your release and architecture, then you get the glxspheres benchmark on 32 and glxspheres64 on 64-bit.
Similar numbers with glxspheres64richb wrote:No it is 60 for the integrated intel.Stevo wrote:But isn't that 1000 fps a lot slower than the integrated GPU?
Thanks. I am not on the laptop right now. But will get it when I am. By the way I remembered glxspheres is a better comparison. It will be interesting to see how that fares.Here is the latest virtualgl: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1GEVdo ... mBjoYDMKec
You only need to install the virtualgl deb for your release and architecture, then you get the glxspheres benchmark on 32 and glxspheres64 on 64-bit.
No hdmi sound card. I found something strange: Some program (for ex. Telegram) ran but I couldn't change it's output device to USB earphones but some could (for ex. Clementine).entropyfoe wrote:ldsemerchen
Is there an hdmi sound card or device showing?
Sometimes those need to be turned off or de-selected.