Signed iso files

Message
Author
User avatar
anticapitalista
Developer
Posts: 4160
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 10:40 am

Re: Signed iso files

#11 Post by anticapitalista »

Adrian wrote: I see some people sign the md5sums and some people sign the ISOs, from what I understand the advantage of signing the md5sums is that it's a quick operation to sign a one line text file, while it takes a long time to sign a ISO, but if you sign the ISO if you verify the signature you don't need to verify the md5sum too, am I right? (It's still good to provide md5sums because some people don't bother to verify signatures)
Not 100% sure, but I would guess if the iso is verified then it should be good to go i.e. not corrupted by a download.

I would have thought that verifying the actual iso (that is after all what is going to be installed) is better for security.
anticapitalista
Reg. linux user #395339.

Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.

antiX with runit - lean and mean.
https://antixlinux.com

User avatar
Stevo
Developer
Posts: 12774
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:07 pm

Re: Signed iso files

#12 Post by Stevo »

Ahh, the Peppermint link has the answer for Windows:
Windows Users

Windows users can download and install GPG (Gpg4win) from here:

https://gpg4win.org/download.html

Then substitute “gpg” with “C:\Program Files\Gnu\GnuPg\gpg.exe” in the four commands above.

User avatar
eugen-b
Posts: 92
Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2015 1:56 pm

Re: Signed iso files

#13 Post by eugen-b »

Adrian wrote:
I see some people sign the md5sums and some people sign the ISOs, from what I understand the advantage of signing the md5sums is that it's a quick operation to sign a one line text file, while it takes a long time to sign a ISO, but if you sign the ISO if you verify the signature you don't need to verify the md5sum too, am I right? (It's still good to provide md5sums because some people don't bother to verify signatures)
Oberon from Manjaro recommends gpa which seems to be a self explanatory GUI for GPG.
From security standpoint signing the .iso or the iso.md5 is (almost) equivalent. A signature also provides the security service of integrity, so you don't need to verify an md5sum.
The trade-off would be in terms of performacne vs. ease of use. It seem to be obviously faster to sign an iso.md5 (or iso.sha1) which you need to have calculated before.
But in fact it is not so obvious, because it also depends on the machine. Mine takes very long (several minutes) for md5sum checks, but it takes much less time (half a minute) for a signature check of .iso file. Well, you need to import the key once for each distro.
MX-14 on a Via Eden 1GHz CPU thin client, 3GB RAM, Via VX800 chipset, Via Chrome9 HC GPU, 32GB M.2 SSD;
btrfs with @ and @home subvolumes for MX-14;
added @antiX and @antiXhome subvolumes and copied antix 13.1 base into them, adjusting Grub from MX-14.

User avatar
Stevo
Developer
Posts: 12774
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:07 pm

Re: Signed iso files

#14 Post by Stevo »

This is still security related--if we ever implement https for the passwords here and for the community pages, I see letsencrypt is now in jessie-backports. That's a weak point if passwords are sent in the clear, then the links and directions could be hacked.

User avatar
Adrian
Developer
Posts: 8248
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 1:42 am

Re: Signed iso files

#15 Post by Adrian »

Stevo wrote:This is still security related--if we ever implement https for the passwords here and for the community pages, I see letsencrypt is now in jessie-backports. That's a weak point if passwords are sent in the clear, then the links and directions could be hacked.
I agree, we need to use https for the forum.

User avatar
richb
Administrator
Posts: 10322
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:17 pm

Re: Signed iso files

#16 Post by richb »

Adrian wrote:
Stevo wrote:This is still security related--if we ever implement https for the passwords here and for the community pages, I see letsencrypt is now in jessie-backports. That's a weak point if passwords are sent in the clear, then the links and directions could be hacked.
I agree, we need to use https for the forum.
Still in the wings and not forgotten.
Forum Rules
Guide - How to Ask for Help

richb Administrator
System: MX 23 KDE
AMD A8 7600 FM2+ CPU R7 Graphics, 16 GIG Mem. Three Samsung EVO SSD's 250 GB

User avatar
KernSpy
Posts: 144
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2014 10:09 pm

Re: Signed iso files

#17 Post by KernSpy »

Should I stop my MX-15 (32/64bit) torrents in qbittorrent, check them and then restart them?
MX-19.2_x64 | System76 Galago UltraPro / Clevo W740SU | Intel Core i7-4770HQ | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | 16 GB DDR3 | Intel 530 series mSATA SSD - 240-GB | WD7500BPKX - 750-GB | Intel HD Audio.

User avatar
anticapitalista
Developer
Posts: 4160
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 10:40 am

Re: Signed iso files

#18 Post by anticapitalista »

KernSpy wrote:Should I stop my MX-15 (32/64bit) torrents in qbittorrent, check them and then restart them?
No.
anticapitalista
Reg. linux user #395339.

Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.

antiX with runit - lean and mean.
https://antixlinux.com

User avatar
KernSpy
Posts: 144
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2014 10:09 pm

Re: Signed iso files

#19 Post by KernSpy »

OK, Thanks!
MX-19.2_x64 | System76 Galago UltraPro / Clevo W740SU | Intel Core i7-4770HQ | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | 16 GB DDR3 | Intel 530 series mSATA SSD - 240-GB | WD7500BPKX - 750-GB | Intel HD Audio.

User avatar
Stevo
Developer
Posts: 12774
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:07 pm

Re: Signed iso files

#20 Post by Stevo »

GPA (GNU Privacy Assistant) looks like the GUI for xfce.

It looks like we should recommend Windows users use the GPA included with Gpg4win for a GUI, there's some big fat version, but also a lite, then an even smaller "vanilla" version. I think the "Lite" version, which has GPA, looks good.

Locked

Return to “General”