Jerry3904 wrote:@ Stevo and/or DO: why do the GoldGrey conkies show up? They are not in the GitHub repo.
I can. You mean the ./conky folder. There are more than 4 in there.Jerry3904 wrote:@Rich: can you do that, since you have the equipment? For all 4 conkies in the Default folder.
In the long run, we have a solution in the pipeline that will take care of this.
There is no GoldGrey in the /usr/... folder, so I wonder if there's something left over in ~/.conky/ by mistake? It should be empty at install until MX Conky is launched, right?dolphin_oracle wrote:Jerry3904 wrote:@ Stevo and/or DO: why do the GoldGrey conkies show up? They are not in the GitHub repo.
I built with whatever came down in the update. So I don't know.
Or
Its also possible that I didn't get them removed from the home folder when doing the updating. compare ~/.conky vs. /usr/share/mx-conky-data and see if things match.
Thanks. I saw that was causing trouble when I tried to change the weekday format.dolphin_oracle wrote:One of the things to watch in the conky fine tuning is the "max size" designation inside the conky files. I tweaked the current default by expanding that value to 700 (originally 550 I think) as "Wednesday" was cut off at the "d".
OK will do.Jerry3904 wrote:No, I mean the ./conky/Default folder. Those are the first-order ones we need to get polished for RC
They aren't part of the current 20171128 mx-conky-data package...dolphin_oracle wrote:Jerry3904 wrote:@ Stevo and/or DO: why do the GoldGrey conkies show up? They are not in the GitHub repo.
I built with whatever came down in the update. So I don't know.
Or
Its also possible that I didn't get them removed from the home folder when doing the updating. compare ~/.conky vs. /usr/share/mx-conky-data and see if things match.
check with Code: Select all
dpkg-query -L mx-conky-data