Main OS on my media PC since the day of final release.
Qupzilla was buggy at first now solid and fast.
System just does what i need it to do, stream video, store media and allow me to browse the web, in short the OS does it's job and runs steady as a rock.
MX 14 will be the OS on that machine till the hardware fails, I see no need to chase after "sexier" distros anymore than I need a sexier toaster. I need my toaster to toaste bread and my PC to allow me to perform the task I want it to. MX14 fits the bill.
MX14 day to day.
MX14 day to day.
"Computers are tools; they should primarily be designed to easily complete the task desired"
Dell Dimension 4700 - ANTIX 19 on Kingston A400 SSD
ACER Desktop Athlon 64X2 - MX 19
Acer C720P 32GB SSD 4GB Memory Ex- Chromebook - GalliumOS
Dell Dimension 4700 - ANTIX 19 on Kingston A400 SSD
ACER Desktop Athlon 64X2 - MX 19
Acer C720P 32GB SSD 4GB Memory Ex- Chromebook - GalliumOS
Re: MX14 day to day.
I see no need to chase after "sexier" distros anymore than I need a sexier toaster.
Production: 5.10, MX-23 Xfce, AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core, GeForce GT 630/PCIe/SSE2, 16 GB, SSD 120 GB, Data 1TB
Personal: Lenovo X1 Carbon with MX-23 Fluxbox and Windows 10
Other: Raspberry Pi 5 with MX-23 Xfce Raspberry Pi Respin
Personal: Lenovo X1 Carbon with MX-23 Fluxbox and Windows 10
Other: Raspberry Pi 5 with MX-23 Xfce Raspberry Pi Respin
Re: MX14 day to day.
Well, then you've never seen one of these: http://www.dvice.com/archives/2012/09/f ... e_morn.phpzarg2 wrote: I see no need to chase after "sexier" distros anymore than I need a sexier toaster. I need my toaster to toaste bread
MX-14; 3.12-0.bpo.1-686-pae kernel using 4GB RAM
2.4GHz AMD Athlon 4600+
NVidia GeForce 6150 LE; 304.121 Display Driver
You didn't slow down because you're old; you're old because you slowed down.
2.4GHz AMD Athlon 4600+
NVidia GeForce 6150 LE; 304.121 Display Driver
You didn't slow down because you're old; you're old because you slowed down.
Re: MX14 day to day.
Knock on wood.zarg2 wrote:MX 14 will be the OS on that machine till the hardware fails
Re: MX14 day to day.
I generally feel the same way as I have it running on all 3 machines I use and it works just as it should. It bugs me a bit that some of the software in the Wheezy repos is kind of old but such is life. For example, the torrent program I prefer is qbittorrent and it's at version 2.9.8 in Wheezy and 3.1.9 in Windows and Buntu. Is 3.1.9 better? Probably or the developers wouldn't have done the work...
Life's tough, it's tougher if you're stupid...
Re: MX14 day to day.
If the difference is significant and if the package is important to you, you can always make a request to the Community Packagers. I see that 3.1.8-2 is in Jessie, and it is often not greatly complicated to backport it from there.For example, the torrent program I prefer is qbittorrent and it's at version 2.9.8 in Wheezy and 3.1.9 in Windows and Buntu.
Production: 5.10, MX-23 Xfce, AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core, GeForce GT 630/PCIe/SSE2, 16 GB, SSD 120 GB, Data 1TB
Personal: Lenovo X1 Carbon with MX-23 Fluxbox and Windows 10
Other: Raspberry Pi 5 with MX-23 Xfce Raspberry Pi Respin
Personal: Lenovo X1 Carbon with MX-23 Fluxbox and Windows 10
Other: Raspberry Pi 5 with MX-23 Xfce Raspberry Pi Respin
Re: MX14 day to day.
I really don't know whether it's way better or not only that it's more advanced version wise. Since the choice of programs is a user decision, I hesitate to ask for stuff that I may be the only one using. Most distros choose "Transmission" as the default torrent program but I just don't like it. Since qbittorrent is maintained for Windows and Linux I use it in each OS. I was surprised to see it as the default in siduction...Jerry3904 wrote:If the difference is significant and if the package is important to you, you can always make a request to the Community Packagers. I see that 3.1.8-2 is in Jessie, and it is often not greatly complicated to backport it from there.For example, the torrent program I prefer is qbittorrent and it's at version 2.9.8 in Wheezy and 3.1.9 in Windows and Buntu.
Life's tough, it's tougher if you're stupid...
- uncle mark
- Posts: 793
- Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 10:42 pm
Re: MX14 day to day.
Such is the tension between stability and new & shiny. To each his own. Me, I don't care how old or what version number something is as long as it does what I want/need it to do.NGIB wrote:I generally feel the same way as I have it running on all 3 machines I use and it works just as it should. It bugs me a bit that some of the software in the Wheezy repos is kind of old but such is life. For example, the torrent program I prefer is qbittorrent and it's at version 2.9.8 in Wheezy and 3.1.9 in Windows and Buntu. Is 3.1.9 better? Probably or the developers wouldn't have done the work...
You said you use gbitorrent in both Windows and Linux. What differences are there between the current Windows version and the older Wheezy version?
Custom build Asus/AMD/nVidia circa 2011 -- MX 19.2 KDE
Acer Aspire 5250 -- MX 21 KDE
Toshiba Satellite C55 -- MX 18.3 Xfce
Assorted Junk -- assorted Linuxes
Acer Aspire 5250 -- MX 21 KDE
Toshiba Satellite C55 -- MX 18.3 Xfce
Assorted Junk -- assorted Linuxes
Re: MX14 day to day.
Haven't closely examined them side by side but in general, updates are not released to make something worse or less efficient and many changes are "under the hood". I'll admit that much of it is probably just perception - but perception for each of us is reality. Like most folks, I search for the "perfect" system when in reality it doesn't exist. To me, if Lubuntu had snapshot, and no wifi bugs it would be just about right for me. When Zorin Lite finally updates to using a 14.04 base I will give it a serious look as it does have a snapshot capability built in (not as polished as MX-14 though).uncle mark wrote:Such is the tension between stability and new & shiny. To each his own. Me, I don't care how old or what version number something is as long as it does what I want/need it to do.NGIB wrote:I generally feel the same way as I have it running on all 3 machines I use and it works just as it should. It bugs me a bit that some of the software in the Wheezy repos is kind of old but such is life. For example, the torrent program I prefer is qbittorrent and it's at version 2.9.8 in Wheezy and 3.1.9 in Windows and Buntu. Is 3.1.9 better? Probably or the developers wouldn't have done the work...
You said you use gbitorrent in both Windows and Linux. What differences are there between the current Windows version and the older Wheezy version?
I was actually reading the antix-14 thread today as I was considering trying to put LXDE in it and being based on testing the software is fresher. I saw Ceni mentioned in the thread and didn't read any further. I battled getting wireless to work under Ceni a few years ago (I think I was looking at antix) and I gave up after an hour and went to something else...
Life's tough, it's tougher if you're stupid...
- dolphin_oracle
- Developer
- Posts: 20036
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 1:17 pm
Re: MX14 day to day.
FYI - antix comes with wicd as well. no need to use ceni in most cases. and wicd plays well with ceni if you do want to use ceni. But the antix-14 alpha is still pretty rough and not ready for consumption unless you want to break things and report bugs.I was actually reading the antix-14 thread today as I was considering trying to put LXDE in it and being based on testing the software is fresher. I saw Ceni mentioned in the thread and didn't read any further. I battled getting wireless to work under Ceni a few years ago (I think I was looking at antix) and I gave up after an hour and went to something else...
http://www.youtube.com/runwiththedolphin
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.