In addition to ensuring the sourceforge version of the iso does not infringe any copyright or licences, I would request that going forward, you do not publicise on this forum the existence of your big iso with the questionable software.
It doesn't matter that you may intend to host this privately rather than on sourceforge, and I do appreciate your enthusiasm in being able to use the snapshot tool to make an iso of your own private MATE installation with all the programs you use, but the forum should not contain contain any links to where it can be found or any announcements/publicity about it.
mx linux mate 17.1 tested for release
Re: mx linux mate 17.1 tested for release
Desktop: Intel i5-4460, 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics
Clevo N130WU-based Ultrabook: Intel i7-8550U (Kaby Lake R), 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics (UEFI)
ASUS X42D laptop: AMD Phenom II, 6GB RAM, Mobility Radeon HD 5400
Clevo N130WU-based Ultrabook: Intel i7-8550U (Kaby Lake R), 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics (UEFI)
ASUS X42D laptop: AMD Phenom II, 6GB RAM, Mobility Radeon HD 5400
Re: mx linux mate 17.1 tested for release
And to repeat what I posted in another thread of yours, the name is licensed and can not be used without permission:
License
The name "MX Linux" is covered by LInux Foundation Sublicense No. 20140605-0483
Production: 5.10, MX-23 Xfce, AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core, GeForce GT 630/PCIe/SSE2, 16 GB, SSD 120 GB, Data 1TB
Personal: Lenovo X1 Carbon with MX-23 Fluxbox and Windows 10
Other: Raspberry Pi 5 with MX-23 Xfce Raspberry Pi Respin
Personal: Lenovo X1 Carbon with MX-23 Fluxbox and Windows 10
Other: Raspberry Pi 5 with MX-23 Xfce Raspberry Pi Respin