libreoffice
Re: libreoffice
<post deleted by Mod, user banned>
- anticapitalista
- Developer
- Posts: 4166
- Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 10:40 am
Re: libreoffice
please delete spammer above
anticapitalista
Reg. linux user #395339.
Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.
antiX with runit - lean and mean.
https://antixlinux.com
Reg. linux user #395339.
Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.
antiX with runit - lean and mean.
https://antixlinux.com
Re: libreoffice
In fact he is not a spammer: he is just pointing out that the software in question is non-free and expensive.
I reported his post before I realized that it was really OK, and I see no way to cancel my report.
Re: libreoffice
What's actually missing in that post is that Softmaker Office is an excellent Office Product
and comes in two variants:
As commercial product
and
as a freeware product https://www.freeoffice.com/en/
The freeware version is full functional, with only some slight restrictions,e.g not a full commercial
spell-and grammer-checker included, but the opensource spellchecker variant.
What I understand from users using it, and from published reports,
is that SoftmakerOffice/Freeoffice beats most other commercial and free Office products
including LibreOffice in regard to compatibility to MS Office.
Gigabyte Z77M-D3H, Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2 (Quad core), 32GB RAM,
GeForce GTX 770, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 500GB, Seagate Barracuda 4TB
GeForce GTX 770, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 500GB, Seagate Barracuda 4TB
- anticapitalista
- Developer
- Posts: 4166
- Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 10:40 am
Re: libreoffice
How do you know that the post is pointing out the app is non-free and expensive?
It seems to me that poster is advertising the product (and not the 'free' one)
anticapitalista
Reg. linux user #395339.
Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.
antiX with runit - lean and mean.
https://antixlinux.com
Reg. linux user #395339.
Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.
antiX with runit - lean and mean.
https://antixlinux.com
Re: libreoffice
Agreed in this sense, it is a stupid spam post.anticapitalista wrote: ↑Wed Dec 19, 2018 6:05 amHow do you know that the post is pointing out the app is non-free and expensive?
It seems to me that poster is advertising the product (and not the 'free' one)
Gigabyte Z77M-D3H, Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2 (Quad core), 32GB RAM,
GeForce GTX 770, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 500GB, Seagate Barracuda 4TB
GeForce GTX 770, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 500GB, Seagate Barracuda 4TB
Re: libreoffice
That's how I saw it, and acted.
Production: 5.10, MX-23 Xfce, AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core, GeForce GT 630/PCIe/SSE2, 16 GB, SSD 120 GB, Data 1TB
Personal: Lenovo X1 Carbon with MX-23 Fluxbox and Windows 10
Other: Raspberry Pi 5 with MX-23 Xfce Raspberry Pi Respin
Personal: Lenovo X1 Carbon with MX-23 Fluxbox and Windows 10
Other: Raspberry Pi 5 with MX-23 Xfce Raspberry Pi Respin
Re: libreoffice
Thanks for that interesting information, fehlix.
I will try the freeware version.
I will try the freeware version.
Re: libreoffice
The free version of Softmaker is a fine product for MS-Office-Documents. Better support than LO. The freeware product has limitations. You can't save in the old MS-Formats *.doc, *.xls *.ppt and you have no commercial spell-checker, see posting by fehlix. Documents in the free standard *.odt are supported but no others. That's a shame. This restriction have all variants of Softmaker Office and for all versions you need to register.
I personally use the Standard Version of the product. Standard Version can save Documents in the old *.doc, *.xls, formats etc. but the commercial spell-checker only aviable in the professional edition.
I personally use the Standard Version of the product. Standard Version can save Documents in the old *.doc, *.xls, formats etc. but the commercial spell-checker only aviable in the professional edition.
for those with an eye for the finer details...
Re: libreoffice
I know you defend your fellow citizen fehlixfehlix wrote: ↑Wed Dec 19, 2018 6:02 am What's actually missing in that post is that Softmaker Office is an excellent Office Product
and comes in two variants:
As commercial product
and
as a freeware product https://www.freeoffice.com/en/
The freeware version is full functional, with only some slight restrictions,e.g not a full commercial
spell-and grammer-checker included, but the opensource spellchecker variant.
What I understand from users using it, and from published reports,
is that SoftmakerOffice/Freeoffice beats most other commercial and free Office products
including LibreOffice in regard to compatibility to MS Office.
Softmaker is good indeed even in his free version but sincerely I tried many software and no one is perfectly compatible with M$ office standards and SM is no exception. It's sad to say but even Office is not fully compatible with another version of Office.