SUGGESTION: replace Xfburn with K3b

Message
Author
User avatar
entropyfoe
Posts: 591
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 11:42 am

Re: SUGGESTION: replace Xfburn with K3b

#11 Post by entropyfoe »

I agree with asqwerth and others,

I prefer k3b. I like the md5 auto calculation. It drags in a bunch of KDE dependencies. But I have enough disk space.

So, I think it should not be a default application, but rather one that any user can install with synaptic in a minute.
Asus PRIME X470-PRO
AMD Ryzen 3600X (12 threads @ 3.8 GHz)
32 Gig DDR4 3600 (Crucial CL 16)
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Samsung 970 NVMe nvme0n1 P1-3=MX-23, P4=testing
Samsung 980 NVMe =1TB Data, plus 2TB WD =backups
on-board ethernet & sound

User avatar
whell
Posts: 66
Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 1:03 pm

Re: SUGGESTION: replace Xfburn with K3b

#12 Post by whell »

I'd also suggest leaving xfburn as the default burning app, and also installed K3B from the repos. Seems likely that fewer folks are burning CD's and DVD's these days, but for those that do, its great to have the option of installing K3B.

User avatar
lucky9
Posts: 475
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 5:54 am

Re: SUGGESTION: replace Xfburn with K3b

#13 Post by lucky9 »

+1 for choice
Yes, even I am dishonest. Not in many ways, but in some. Forty-one, I think it is.
--Mark Twain

User avatar
Stevo
Developer
Posts: 12837
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:07 pm

Re: SUGGESTION: replace Xfburn with K3b

#14 Post by Stevo »

What about Brasero? It should verify a burn by default (the Image Checksum plugin is enabled by default), and only needs to download about 6MB of dependencies that expand to take about 20MB of disk space, far less than the KDE runtime libraries required by K3b.

User avatar
whell
Posts: 66
Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 1:03 pm

Re: SUGGESTION: replace Xfburn with K3b

#15 Post by whell »

Basero has a history of "bugginess". I've used it sparingly given prior poor experiences and it still works rather sporadically for me. Your mileage may vary.

Post Reply

Return to “General”