For interesting topics. But remember this is a Linux Forum. Do not post offensive topics that are meant to cause trouble with other members or are derogatory towards people of different genders, race, color, minors (this includes nudity and sex), politics or religion. Let's try to keep peace among the community and for visitors.
No spam on this or any other forums please! If you post advertisements on these forums, your account may be deleted.
Do not copy and paste entire or even up to half of someone else's words or articles into posts. Post only a few sentences or a paragraph and make sure to include a link back to original words or article. Otherwise it's copyright infringement.
You can talk about other distros here, but no MX bashing. You can email the developers of MX if you just want to say you dislike or hate MX.
There is an interesting point said in their forum:
We’ll just continue to live as Linux Mint continued to live when Manjaro took its place.
Actually, there is people in the community that are relieved and happy that Manjaro loses “the #1 distro status” and I kinda understand why, it removes a lot of pressure on the distro by not having to deal with the people having über high expectations from “the #1 distro”.
Last edited by rasat on Mon Jun 24, 2019 12:40 pm, edited 9 times in total.
Mepis forum was here long before MX. Nothing to do with DW or reviews. It was to help Mepis users.
MX was created in 2014 by fellow Mepis and antiX users to fill the void once it was confirmed Warren wasn't working on Mepis anymore and that Mepis 12 Beta would never be finished. Again, it was for the benefit of the community of Mepis users and then later, MX community.
There was no quest or desire to reach the top of any rankings.
It is of course gratifying that other people recognise the good work of the Devs of MX and antiX. But IMO, recognition is not the primary aim of MX.
What I do hope is for the increased recognition to bring in more MX members who can make contributions to code, packaging, translation, tutorials, artwork, forum support and other areas.
Desktop: Intel i5-4460, 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics
Clevo N130WU-based Ultrabook: Intel i7-8550U (Kaby Lake R), 16GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics (UEFI)
ASUS X42D laptop: AMD Phenom II, 6GB RAM, Mobility Radeon HD 5400
asqwerth wrote: ↑Tue Apr 09, 2019 5:26 am
What I do hope is for the increased recognition to bring in more MX members who can make contributions to code, packaging, translation, tutorials, artwork, forum support and other areas.
This will come, fame has its advantage. I took a quick look what Manjaro did beside a distro. Also they have a history.
I remember, Arch Linux was never in flavor for any fork, so those distros who did were on their own. Some of them did well, particular Manjaro and Antergos. Browsing Manjaro's website, is quite impressive. With the fame, their have their own branded hardware. https://www.ubuntushop.be/index.php/en/ ... books.html
I care in the sense that MX is not even known to many people. When people ask on different forums "I need a distro that works great as a USB stick, I need persistency, what should I use?" I see a lot of responses but rarely people say "Use antiX or MX" which are the queen and king of distros when it comes to persistency, remastering, creating ISO snapshots. So anything helps even a non-relevant distrowatch ranking that doesn't mean much if it gives MX a bit of more share of mind that's a good thing.
So yeah, it doesn't mean much, but it's still a good thing. We'll attract more trolling for sure too... but hey, that's the price to pay for popularity.