Welcome!

Please read this important information about Spectre and Meltdown vulnerabilities.
Please read this important information about MX sources lists.
News
  • MX Linux on social media: here
  • Mepis support still here
Current releases
  • MX-17 Final release info here
  • MX-16.1 release info here
  • antiX-17 release info here
    New users
    • Please read this first, and don't forget to add system and hardware information to posts!
    • Read Forum Rules

Flash Security Update

Feel free to talk about anything and everything in this board. Just don't post offensive topics that are meant to cause trouble with other members or are derogatory towards people of different genders, race, color, minors (this includes nudity and sex), politics or religion. Let's try to keep peace among the community and for visitors.

No spam on this or any other forums please! If you post advertisements on these forums, your account may be deleted.

Do not copy and paste entire or even up to half of someone else's words or articles into posts. Post only a few sentences or a paragraph and make sure to include a link back to original words or article. Otherwise it's copyright infringement.

You can talk about other distros here, but no MX bashing. You can email the developers of MX if you just want to say you dislike or hate MX.
Message
Author
User avatar
v3g4n
Forum Guide
Forum Guide
Posts: 1779
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2016 8:20 pm

Re: Flash Security Update

#61 Postby v3g4n » Thu Oct 27, 2016 8:12 am

MY GOODNESS! :eek:
that there is a doozy.
Thanks!

User avatar
richb
Administrator
Posts: 15998
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:17 pm

Re: Flash Security Update

#62 Postby richb » Thu Oct 27, 2016 8:19 am

Well done. Corrects a bothersome situation.
Forum Rules
Guide - How to Ask for Help

Rich
SSD Production: MX-15- 64 - migrated to MX-16 RC1
HD Test: MX-16 RC1
AMD A8 7600 FM2+ CPU R7 Graphics, fglrx driver, 16 GIG Mem. Samsung EVO SSD 250 GB, 350 GB HD

User avatar
Stevo
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 14420
Age: 59
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:07 pm

Re: Flash Security Update

#63 Postby Stevo » Thu Oct 27, 2016 2:31 pm

We have a version of flashplugin-nonfree in the repo that includes that command as "update-flashplugin-nonfree-direct", but Debian had a little upgrade that installed over it. I just installed our repo version, and that command worked to upgrade to the .643 Flash, so I'll have to bump our version again.

User avatar
Adrian
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 7826
Age: 42
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 1:42 am

Re: Flash Security Update

#64 Postby Adrian » Thu Oct 27, 2016 3:02 pm

Stevo wrote:We have a version of flashplugin-nonfree in the repo that includes that command as "update-flashplugin-nonfree-direct", but Debian had a little upgrade that installed over it. I just installed our repo version, and that command worked to upgrade to the .643 Flash, so I'll have to bump our version again.

Great, I wonder if it's not better to use a different epoch to avoid such situations (but then you are stuck maintaining it).

User avatar
Stevo
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 14420
Age: 59
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:07 pm

Re: Flash Security Update

#65 Postby Stevo » Thu Oct 27, 2016 3:06 pm

Adrian wrote:
Stevo wrote:We have a version of flashplugin-nonfree in the repo that includes that command as "update-flashplugin-nonfree-direct", but Debian had a little upgrade that installed over it. I just installed our repo version, and that command worked to upgrade to the .643 Flash, so I'll have to bump our version again.

Great, I wonder if it's not better to use a different epoch to avoid such situations (but then you are stuck maintaining it).


Yeah, I ended up having to add an epoch for our version of mpv, and I keep forgetting to add it whenever I do a backport. Stretch has a newer fpn-nf package with a few improvements, so I'll just backport that and add our script.

User avatar
kmathern
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 9119
Age: 59
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:26 pm

Re: Flash Security Update

#66 Postby kmathern » Thu Oct 27, 2016 3:23 pm

Stevo wrote:We have a version of flashplugin-nonfree in the repo that includes that command as "update-flashplugin-nonfree-direct", but Debian had a little upgrade that installed over it. I just installed our repo version, and that command worked to upgrade to the .643 Flash, so I'll have to bump our version again.
I forgot about the update-flashplugin-nonfree-direct script.

What I posted earlier today is pretty much the samething, though in todays version I added some extra wget options to give a download progress printout similar to what the Debian update-flashplugin-nonfree script displays.

User avatar
Stevo
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 14420
Age: 59
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:07 pm

Re: Flash Security Update

#67 Postby Stevo » Thu Oct 27, 2016 8:10 pm

I'll put an upgrade on the to-do list.

Here it is, will also send to rhe repo: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BxE7w ... EpaM0hldFE

User avatar
Eadwine Rose
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 5057
Age: 45
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:10 am

Re: Flash Security Update

#68 Postby Eadwine Rose » Fri Oct 28, 2016 2:57 am

I upgraded flashplugin-nonfree (1:3.6.1+deb8u1) to 1:3.7mx15+2 package just now, went to mx flash manager. It said there was no Adobe flash installed, so went to install it. However still no Adobe flash installed.

I tried it again but no dice.
MX-17_x64 Horizon 2017-12-15 4.14.0-3-amd64 ext4 Xfce 4.12 * AMD Asus M4A785TD-V EVO AM3 * ASUS GeForce GT640-1GD5-L NVIDIA 387.34 * AMD Proc. Athl II X4 635, sAM3 * HDA ATI SB VT1708S An * 2x4Gb DDR3 1600 Kingst * 22" Samsung SyncM P2250 * HP F2280

User avatar
kmathern
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 9119
Age: 59
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:26 pm

Re: Flash Security Update

#69 Postby kmathern » Fri Oct 28, 2016 7:10 am

Eadwine Rose wrote:I upgraded flashplugin-nonfree (1:3.6.1+deb8u1) to 1:3.7mx15+2 package just now, went to mx flash manager. It said there was no Adobe flash installed, so went to install it. However still no Adobe flash installed.

I tried it again but no dice.

I got the error message below during the upgrade of Stevo's updated flashplugin-nonfree, and MX Flash did show that Adobe Flash wasn't installed.

Code: Select all

Setting up flashplugin-nonfree (1:3.7mx15+2) ...
ERROR: wget failed to download http://people.debian.org/~bartm/flashplugin-nonfree/D5C0FC14/fp.11.2.202.643.sha512.amd64.pgp.asc
More information might be available at:
  http://wiki.debian.org/FlashPlayer


If you then run the command below, MX Flash will show that Adobe Flash is installed.

Code: Select all

sudo update-flashplugin-nonfree-direct


I think Adrian is going to make some changes and add that command to MX Flash, but looking at github I don't think he's added it yet.

User avatar
Adrian
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 7826
Age: 42
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 1:42 am

Re: Flash Security Update

#70 Postby Adrian » Fri Oct 28, 2016 2:28 pm

kmathern wrote:If you then run the command below, MX Flash will show that Adobe Flash is installed.

Code: Select all

sudo update-flashplugin-nonfree-direct


I think Adrian is going to make some changes and add that command to MX Flash, but looking at github I don't think he's added it yet.

I made the change, it should pop up soon in the repo.


Return to “General”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest