Welcome!

The kernel problem with recent updates has been solved. Find the solution here

Important information
-- Required MX 15/16 Repository Changes
-- Information on torrent hosting changes
-- Information on MX15/16 GPG Keys
-- Spectre and Meltdown vulnerabilities

News
-- Introducing our new Website
-- MX Linux on social media: here

Current releases
-- MX-18.3 Point Release release info here
-- Migration Information to MX-18 here
-- antiX-17.4.1 release info here

New users
-- Please read this first, and don't forget to add system and hardware information to posts!
-- Here are the Forum Rules

Calling for MX-18 conkies

Any MX member can start threads and post in this section. Feel free to express your views, make requests, offer support, give ideas - basically anything to do with MX art. Art usually is an "in the eye of the beholder" thing - so please respect everyone's right to their own personal taste!
User avatar
Jerry3904
Administrator
Posts: 25815
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:13 am

Re: Calling for MX-18 conkies

#41

Post by Jerry3904 » Fri Nov 16, 2018 9:41 pm

I did extract everything into the .conky folder, of course, but the subfolder threw the script links off. I personally do that all the time...
Production: 4.15.0-1-amd64, MX-17.1, AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core, GeForce GT 630/PCIe/SSE2, 8 GB, SSD 120 GB, Data 1TB
Testing: AAO 722: 4.15.0-1-386. MX-17.1, AMD C-60 APU, 4 GB
Personal: XPS 13, 4.18.0-19.3-liquorix, 4 GB

User avatar
Jerry3904
Administrator
Posts: 25815
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:13 am

Re: Calling for MX-18 conkies

#42

Post by Jerry3904 » Sat Nov 17, 2018 8:06 pm

This one took a lot of effort to make work...
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Production: 4.15.0-1-amd64, MX-17.1, AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core, GeForce GT 630/PCIe/SSE2, 8 GB, SSD 120 GB, Data 1TB
Testing: AAO 722: 4.15.0-1-386. MX-17.1, AMD C-60 APU, 4 GB
Personal: XPS 13, 4.18.0-19.3-liquorix, 4 GB

User avatar
manyroads
Forum Regular
Forum Regular
Posts: 1876
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2018 6:33 pm

Re: Calling for MX-18 conkies

#43

Post by manyroads » Sat Dec 08, 2018 3:30 pm

Hello all...

Here's an image of what I'm running:
ManyRoads Conky Screenshot.jpg
If you'd like the code it is available here...

http://many-roads.com/ManyRoads.tar.gz
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Pax vobiscum,
Mark Rabideau - http://many-roads.com
bspwm MX-18.3 kernel: 5.1.11-antix.1-amd64-smp
"For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong." H. L. Mencken
Testing: antiX19

User avatar
Jerry3904
Administrator
Posts: 25815
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:13 am

Re: Calling for MX-18 conkies

#44

Post by Jerry3904 » Sat Dec 08, 2018 4:03 pm

It all works OOTB, nice job. I would like to add it to the conky pack, if you are willing as "MX-ManyRoads" with the prefix being used as throughout to indicate that changes may have also come from the MX Team (I did correct a typo...).

We include a short "source.txt" in each folder that identifies the creator and a relevant web address. Should I just use your dot-com?
Production: 4.15.0-1-amd64, MX-17.1, AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core, GeForce GT 630/PCIe/SSE2, 8 GB, SSD 120 GB, Data 1TB
Testing: AAO 722: 4.15.0-1-386. MX-17.1, AMD C-60 APU, 4 GB
Personal: XPS 13, 4.18.0-19.3-liquorix, 4 GB

User avatar
manyroads
Forum Regular
Forum Regular
Posts: 1876
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2018 6:33 pm

Re: Calling for MX-18 conkies

#45

Post by manyroads » Sat Dec 08, 2018 4:18 pm

@Jerry3904, I would be honored... ;) Please feel free to share the conkies.
Pax vobiscum,
Mark Rabideau - http://many-roads.com
bspwm MX-18.3 kernel: 5.1.11-antix.1-amd64-smp
"For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong." H. L. Mencken
Testing: antiX19

User avatar
Jerry3904
Administrator
Posts: 25815
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:13 am

Re: Calling for MX-18 conkies

#46

Post by Jerry3904 » Sat Dec 08, 2018 4:19 pm

Done. It will be included in the next version (the RC).
Production: 4.15.0-1-amd64, MX-17.1, AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core, GeForce GT 630/PCIe/SSE2, 8 GB, SSD 120 GB, Data 1TB
Testing: AAO 722: 4.15.0-1-386. MX-17.1, AMD C-60 APU, 4 GB
Personal: XPS 13, 4.18.0-19.3-liquorix, 4 GB

User avatar
fehlix
Developer
Posts: 4940
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:09 pm

Re: Calling for MX-18 conkies

#47

Post by fehlix » Sat Dec 08, 2018 7:30 pm

Jerry3904 wrote:
Sat Dec 08, 2018 4:19 pm
Done. It will be included in the next version (the RC).
OK made some sanity checks, applied some corrections to the uploaded new conky "MX-ManyRoads"
- 12/24 pmfix
- hardcoded displayed username
- display battery bar if available
- netwok wlan0 if available else eth0
- wan ip (dig opendns)
=> pull-request asap
:puppy:
Gigabyte Z77M-D3H, Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2 (Quad core), 32GB RAM,
GeForce GTX 770, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 500GB, Seagate Barracuda 4TB

User avatar
Jerry3904
Administrator
Posts: 25815
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 6:13 am

Re: Calling for MX-18 conkies

#48

Post by Jerry3904 » Sat Dec 08, 2018 7:31 pm

Thanks.
Production: 4.15.0-1-amd64, MX-17.1, AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core, GeForce GT 630/PCIe/SSE2, 8 GB, SSD 120 GB, Data 1TB
Testing: AAO 722: 4.15.0-1-386. MX-17.1, AMD C-60 APU, 4 GB
Personal: XPS 13, 4.18.0-19.3-liquorix, 4 GB

User avatar
manyroads
Forum Regular
Forum Regular
Posts: 1876
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2018 6:33 pm

Re: Calling for MX-18 conkies

#49

Post by manyroads » Sat Dec 08, 2018 7:41 pm

Thank you, all.
Pax vobiscum,
Mark Rabideau - http://many-roads.com
bspwm MX-18.3 kernel: 5.1.11-antix.1-amd64-smp
"For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong." H. L. Mencken
Testing: antiX19

User avatar
i_ri
Forum Regular
Forum Regular
Posts: 368
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2015 12:26 am

Re: Calling for MX-18 conkies

#50

Post by i_ri » Tue May 14, 2019 11:31 pm

hello Jerry3904
conky MX-Flair is a truly Nice conky. MX 18.2
A correction for the System_flair conky configuration:
on the last of the lines that begin with offset, for downspeed wlan0, at the end of that line is superfluous curly brace, c, o, l, o, r, curly brace to be removed. right now it prints.

Post Reply

Return to “Art Discussion”