FluxBox in Antix 17.2

[Buck Fankers]

But I see you mentioned MX. Before I did install MX on this eeePC and I was advised to try Antix, so I'm a bit puzzled here...

It's simple. For really slow computer you need antiX. For eeePC I would go with antiX

If you have better computers and you have on all installed Mint, I suggest you replace one of the Mint with MX and see how it goes.
Mint is my first Linux love. I still like it. I probably always will. But there are no more Mint installs on my computers. Only antix/MX (on Debian side). Just sayin... ;-)

p.s.
Just got for 99$, (one of the slowest you can get) Chromebook for Black Friday. Perfect case for antiX. It would fly on it.
Fore some reason I can't get antiX on it. So I tried MX. Didn't expect much. Surprisingly, MX works quite well, I'm impressed.
If your other computers are fast enough for Mint, MX should fly on those.

[Chriske]

Hi guys,

Just installed Antix on a P4 - 2 Gb ram.
Also replaced HD with a SSD
Activated Fluxbox
I'm a bit disapointed about it's speed on internet, I'd expected more speed with this combination
accessing sites with a minimum of photos or movies it rather fast, but otherwise it is slow, CPU is rocketing to its max.

[dolphin_oracle]

Hi guys,

Just installed Antix on a P4 - 2 Gb ram.
Also replaced HD with a SSD
Activated Fluxbox
I'm a bit disapointed about it's speed on internet, I'd expected more speed with this combination
accessing sites with a minimum of photos or movies it rather fast, but otherwise it is slow, CPU is rocketing to its max.

unfortunately there isn't much you can do about the modern day web browser. they are all heavier than the linux desktop in general, and the antiX desktops in particular.