antiX on Samsung Chromebook 3
- Buck Fankers
- Posts: 744
- Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2018 9:06 pm
antiX on Samsung Chromebook 3
Walmart will be selling this one (Intel Celeron version) for 100$ for black friday and I want one with one condition of course, that antiX works on it. I have no use of ChromeOS. So I'm not interested in side by side install with use of Chrouton, but wiping ChromeOS out and replacing it with antiX.
Anyone has any experience with aniX on Samsung Chromebook 3? AntiX lightness and speed should be perfect match for it, but I don't know how is hardware cooperating? Is bios causing any problems, is install miss and match, etc...
https://www.amazon.com/Samsung-Chromebo ... 01N5P6TJW/
Processor 1.6 GHz Intel Celeron
RAM 4 GB ddr3
Hard Drive 16 GB Flash Memory Solid State
Graphics Coprocessor Intel HD Graphics 400
Chipset Brand intel
p.s.
I don't have user account on antiX forum, I hope there are enough members here also :-)
Anyone has any experience with aniX on Samsung Chromebook 3? AntiX lightness and speed should be perfect match for it, but I don't know how is hardware cooperating? Is bios causing any problems, is install miss and match, etc...
https://www.amazon.com/Samsung-Chromebo ... 01N5P6TJW/
Processor 1.6 GHz Intel Celeron
RAM 4 GB ddr3
Hard Drive 16 GB Flash Memory Solid State
Graphics Coprocessor Intel HD Graphics 400
Chipset Brand intel
p.s.
I don't have user account on antiX forum, I hope there are enough members here also :-)
- Buck Fankers
- Posts: 744
- Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2018 9:06 pm
- rokytnji.1
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 706
- Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2014 9:06 pm
Re: antiX on Samsung Chromebook 3
As long as write protect on bios can be bypassed and a new bios installed like in my thread shown above. There are only one show stopper. The SD card reader works OOTB. < out of the box > . But stalls on copying files that are large. Fail to copy can be a common error on the sd slot.
\
Using rox file manager or spacefm. No difference. I blame hardware. Pendrives no problem. SD to pendrive adapter. No problem. Laptop turns on and boots when the lid is lifted. My thread also covers the touchpad settings.
Other than the sd slot weirdness. Which works but is slow. I got no complaints or show stoppers to complain about.
@ the other chromebook members. I still have not fuddled around with write protect any more on that spare cheapo unit I bought. I figure a hardware issue is blocking me from blocking off write protect for a bios change.
Motorcycle wrenching has priority when the weather cools down here.
\
Using rox file manager or spacefm. No difference. I blame hardware. Pendrives no problem. SD to pendrive adapter. No problem. Laptop turns on and boots when the lid is lifted. My thread also covers the touchpad settings.
Code: Select all
harry@biker:~
$ pinxi -U
Starting pinxi self updater.
Using curl as downloader.
Currently running pinxi version number: 3.0.27
Current version patch number: 06
Current version release date: 2018-10-29
Updating pinxi in /usr/local/bin using inxi-perl branch as download source...
Successfully updated to inxi-perl branch version: 3.0.27
New inxi-perl branch version patch number: 11
New inxi-perl branch version release date: 2018-11-14
To run the new version, just start pinxi again.
----------------------------------------
Starting download of man page file now.
Skipping man download because branch version is being used.
harry@biker:~
$ pinxi -v8
System: Host: biker Kernel: 4.15.9-antix.1-amd64-smp x86_64 bits: 64 compiler: gcc v: 6.3.0 Desktop: IceWM 1.4.2
info: icewmtray dm: SLiM 1.3.4 Distro: antiX-17_x64-full Heather Heyer 24 October 2017
base: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch)
Machine: Type: Desktop System: Google product: Parrot v: 1.0 serial: <root required> Chassis: type: 3
serial: <root required>
Mobo: Google model: Parrot v: 1.0 serial: <root required> BIOS: coreboot v: 4.0-6588-g4acd8ea-dirty
date: 09/04/2014
Battery: ID-1: BATX charge: 31.7 Wh condition: 31.7/37.0 Wh (86%) volts: 17.2/14.8 model: SANYO AL12B32 type: Li-ion
serial: 00000000000026FC status: Full
Memory: RAM: total: 3.79 GiB used: 1.18 GiB (31.2%)
RAM Report: permissions: Unable to run dmidecode. Are you root?
PCI Slots: Permissions: Unable to run dmidecode. Are you root?
CPU: Topology: Dual Core model: Intel Celeron 1007U bits: 64 type: MCP arch: Ivy Bridge family: 6 model-id: 3A (58)
stepping: 9 microcode: 17 L2 cache: 2048 KiB bogomips: 5986
Speed: 991 MHz min/max: 800/1500 MHz Core speeds (MHz): 1: 801 2: 798
Flags: acpi aperfmperf apic arat arch_perfmon bts clflush cmov constant_tsc cpuid cpuid_fault cx16 cx8 de ds_cpl
dtes64 dtherm dts epb ept erms est flexpriority fpu fsgsbase fxsr ht lahf_lm lm mca mce mmx monitor msr mtrr
nonstop_tsc nopl nx pae pat pbe pcid pclmulqdq pdcm pebs pge pln pni popcnt pse pse36 pti pts rdtscp rep_good sep
smep ss sse sse2 sse4_1 sse4_2 ssse3 syscall tm tm2 tpr_shadow tsc tsc_deadline_timer vme vmx vnmi vpid x2apic
xsave xsaveopt xtopology xtpr
Vulnerabilities: Type: meltdown mitigation: PTI
Type: spectre_v1 mitigation: __user pointer sanitization
Type: spectre_v2 mitigation: Full generic retpoline
Graphics: Device-1: Intel 3rd Gen Core processor Graphics driver: i915 v: kernel bus ID: 00:02.0 chip ID: 8086:0156
Display: server: X.Org 1.19.2 driver: modesetting unloaded: fbdev,vesa resolution: 1366x768~60Hz
OpenGL: renderer: Mesa DRI Intel Ivybridge Mobile v: 3.3 Mesa 13.0.6 compat-v: 3.0 direct render: Yes
Audio: Device-1: Intel 7 Series/C216 Family High Definition Audio driver: snd_hda_intel v: kernel bus ID: 00:1b.0
chip ID: 8086:1e20
Sound Server: ALSA v: k4.15.9-antix.1-amd64-smp
Network: Device-1: Qualcomm Atheros AR9462 Wireless Network Adapter vendor: Foxconn driver: ath9k v: kernel port: 0400
bus ID: 01:00.0 chip ID: 168c:0034
IF: wlan0 state: up mac: 3c:77:e6:26:f5:b5
IP v4: 192.168.254.70/24 scope: global broadcast: 192.168.254.255
IP v6: fe80::3e77:e6ff:fe26:f5b5/64 scope: link
Device-2: Broadcom and subsidiaries NetLink BCM57785 Gigabit Ethernet PCIe vendor: Acer Incorporated ALI
driver: tg3 v: 3.137 port: 0400 bus ID: 02:00.0 chip ID: 14e4:16b5
IF: eth0 state: down mac: 20:1a:06:14:09:d9
WAN IP: 98.18.198.159
Drives: Local Storage: total: 14.91 GiB used: 5.37 GiB (36.0%)
ID-1: /dev/sda vendor: SanDisk model: SSD U100 16GB size: 14.91 GiB block size: physical: 512 B logical: 512 B
speed: 3.0 Gb/s serial: 132553400495 rev: 6.14 scheme: MBR
Message: No Optical or Floppy data was found.
RAID: Message: No RAID data was found.
Partition: ID-1: / raw size: 14.91 GiB size: 14.62 GiB (98.01%) used: 5.37 GiB (36.7%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/sda1
label: rootantiX uuid: ea719934-26e3-4f25-af62-4f54438f456d
Unmounted: Message: No unmounted partitions found.
USB: Hub: 1-0:1 info: Full speed (or root) Hub ports: 3 rev: 2.0 speed: 480 Mb/s chip ID: 1d6b:0002
Hub: 1-1:2 info: Intel Integrated Rate Matching Hub ports: 4 rev: 2.0 speed: 480 Mb/s chip ID: 8087:0024
Device-1: 1-1.1:5 info: Foxconn / Hon Hai type: Bluetooth driver: btusb interfaces: 2 rev: 1.1 speed: 12 Mb/s
chip ID: 0489:e04e
Device-2: 1-1.3:4 info: Chicony type: Video driver: uvcvideo interfaces: 2 rev: 2.0 speed: 480 Mb/s
chip ID: 04f2:b336
Hub: 2-0:1 info: Full speed (or root) Hub ports: 3 rev: 2.0 speed: 480 Mb/s chip ID: 1d6b:0002
Hub: 2-1:2 info: Intel Integrated Rate Matching Hub ports: 4 rev: 2.0 speed: 480 Mb/s chip ID: 8087:0024
Sensors: System Temperatures: cpu: 46.0 C mobo: N/A
Fan Speeds (RPM): N/A
Repos: No active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/MX.list
Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/antix.list
1: deb http://repo.antixlinux.com/stretch stretch main nosystemd nonfree
Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian-stable-updates.list
1: deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ stretch-updates main contrib non-free
Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian.list
1: deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ stretch main contrib non-free
2: deb http://security.debian.org/ stretch/updates main contrib non-free
Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/google-chrome.list
1: deb [arch=amd64] http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/ stable main
No active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/onion.list
No active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/various.list
Processes: CPU top: 5
1: cpu: 22.6% command: firefox-esr pid: 3043 mem: 339.3 MiB (8.7%)
2: cpu: 13.4% command: firefox-esr pid: 2999 mem: 557.3 MiB (14.3%)
3: cpu: 2.9% command: xorg pid: 2247 mem: 63.1 MiB (1.6%)
4: cpu: 0.6% command: [kworker/0:2] pid: 13902 mem: 0.00 MiB (0.0%)
5: cpu: 0.5% command: conky pid: 2754 mem: 10.4 MiB (0.2%)
Memory top: 5
1: mem: 557.3 MiB (14.3%) command: firefox-esr pid: 2999 cpu: 13.4%
2: mem: 339.3 MiB (8.7%) command: firefox-esr pid: 3043 cpu: 22.6%
3: mem: 79.2 MiB (2.0%) command: firefox-esr pid: 13007 cpu: 0.0%
4: mem: 63.1 MiB (1.6%) command: xorg pid: 2247 cpu: 2.9%
5: mem: 35.2 MiB (0.9%) command: python pid: 2713 cpu: 0.0%
Info: Processes: 136 Uptime: 1h 01m Init: SysVinit v: 2.88 runlevel: 5 default: 5 Compilers: gcc: 6.3.0 alt: 6
Shell: bash v: 4.4.12 running in: lxterminal pinxi: 3.0.27-11
harry@biker:~
$
@ the other chromebook members. I still have not fuddled around with write protect any more on that spare cheapo unit I bought. I figure a hardware issue is blocking me from blocking off write protect for a bios change.
Motorcycle wrenching has priority when the weather cools down here.
- Buck Fankers
- Posts: 744
- Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2018 9:06 pm
Re: antiX on Samsung Chromebook 3
Thank you, so it should work!
I removed write protection screw. I did this first, before going to developer mode, I hope it shouldn't matter?
Then I switched to developer mode and after restart I replaced BIOS with MrChromebook? (does it matter which one to use, is Lewis one better?
Everything seemed OK, backup of the original bios and msg that everything was successfully done.
So I plug in memory stick with the latest 64 17.2 antiX, (that I booted it on another computer and works OK) I get Antix boot screen that is different, text only, without rich graphic, or F options, and if I choose to boot, all I get is black screen. There is something going on with the graphic. This chromebook has some cheap integrated intel graphic card.
So I'm not sure what o do next, do you happen o have any ideas. AntiX USB memory stick boots nicely on another computer.
Looks like MrChromebook BIOS is installed. I can with <ESC> key enter into bios, I can change boot options... but I didn't see any video options. Menu with: "list devices" is empty. But otherwise bios seems like it is OK.
Well, I can't run memory test. It gives me: error: disk 'hd0,msdos2' not found.
Hmm, maybe is something wrong with bios, graphic card & eMMC are not being detected?
P.s.
I was following these steps, pretty detailed and easy to follow:
https://www.codedonut.com/chromebook/in ... mentaryos/
I removed write protection screw. I did this first, before going to developer mode, I hope it shouldn't matter?
Then I switched to developer mode and after restart I replaced BIOS with MrChromebook? (does it matter which one to use, is Lewis one better?
Everything seemed OK, backup of the original bios and msg that everything was successfully done.
So I plug in memory stick with the latest 64 17.2 antiX, (that I booted it on another computer and works OK) I get Antix boot screen that is different, text only, without rich graphic, or F options, and if I choose to boot, all I get is black screen. There is something going on with the graphic. This chromebook has some cheap integrated intel graphic card.
So I'm not sure what o do next, do you happen o have any ideas. AntiX USB memory stick boots nicely on another computer.
Looks like MrChromebook BIOS is installed. I can with <ESC> key enter into bios, I can change boot options... but I didn't see any video options. Menu with: "list devices" is empty. But otherwise bios seems like it is OK.
Well, I can't run memory test. It gives me: error: disk 'hd0,msdos2' not found.
Hmm, maybe is something wrong with bios, graphic card & eMMC are not being detected?
P.s.
I was following these steps, pretty detailed and easy to follow:
https://www.codedonut.com/chromebook/in ... mentaryos/
- Buck Fankers
- Posts: 744
- Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2018 9:06 pm
Re: antiX on Samsung Chromebook 3
There was one more thing. After switching to developer mode, and opening crosh with Ctrl+Alt+T, I could not use that cd: curl... commands. I was getting error that command was not recognized. I couldn't even run ls or cd.. these basic commands didn't work. But I could run 'top' for example.
But it did work when I switched to TV2 (or whatever it is) Ctrl+Alt+-> (right arrow). I then manually entered cd: curl... command and after that everything seemed like it should be...
I will create another iso tomorrow, I will try with Gallium 3.0 just to see if it will make any difference. But I really want antiX.
But it did work when I switched to TV2 (or whatever it is) Ctrl+Alt+-> (right arrow). I then manually entered cd: curl... command and after that everything seemed like it should be...
I will create another iso tomorrow, I will try with Gallium 3.0 just to see if it will make any difference. But I really want antiX.
- Buck Fankers
- Posts: 744
- Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2018 9:06 pm
Re: antiX on Samsung Chromebook 3
Update, I tried with MX and it booted normally with graphic off USB stick and I'm installing it now, so looks like BIOS is OK, something else is causing me problem with antiX memory stick
- Buck Fankers
- Posts: 744
- Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2018 9:06 pm
Re: antiX on Samsung Chromebook 3
Final update before bed. MX 17.1 works so, looks like nothing is wrong with hardware.
Since MX works, it shouldn't be a problem to get antiX to work also. I just don't have enough experience, actually none for antiX and very little for Linux generally. Any suggestions are welcome ;-) Since this is one of the slowest chromebooks you can get, with slow Celeron N3060 I think that antiX would be much more suitable. Although I was surprised about MX performance so far on this calculator
Since MX works, it shouldn't be a problem to get antiX to work also. I just don't have enough experience, actually none for antiX and very little for Linux generally. Any suggestions are welcome ;-) Since this is one of the slowest chromebooks you can get, with slow Celeron N3060 I think that antiX would be much more suitable. Although I was surprised about MX performance so far on this calculator
- Buck Fankers
- Posts: 744
- Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2018 9:06 pm
Re: antiX on Samsung Chromebook 3
I'm surprised, how good is MX performing on this computer. Above all reasonable expectations. I though only antiX would be fast enough. Now I'm thinking to just keep MX on it.
- rokytnji.1
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 706
- Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2014 9:06 pm
Re: antiX on Samsung Chromebook 3
Yeah. Keep MX on it. My AntiX install was more of a learning curve process for me. I used John Lewis bios which is a simpler bios than what ypu described MrChromebook bios seems to use.
If everything works Roll with what you need.
If everything works Roll with what you need.