Welcome!
Important information
-- Spectre and Meltdown vulnerabilities
-- Change in MX sources

News
-- MX Linux on social media: here
-- Mepis support still here

Current releases
-- MX-17.1 Final release info here
-- antiX-17 release info here

New users
-- Please read this first, and don't forget to add system and hardware information to posts!
-- Here are the Forum Rules

MX 17 Repository: The Pale Moon Browser Thread

Message
Author
giorgio3364
Forum Novice
Forum  Novice
Posts: 19
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2018 2:21 pm

Re: MX 17 Repository: The Pale Moon Browser Thread

#41 Post by giorgio3364 » Sat May 12, 2018 2:00 pm

I did the same today, too, coming to the same conclusion, and I uninstalled Firefox. Palemoon seemed less resourceful (about 80-100mb less than Firefox) and slightly more responsive, while remaining sufficiently complete to cover all the needs of an average user. In addition it is frequently updated and, which does not hurt, even with a nice appearance.

Kulmbacher
Forum Novice
Forum  Novice
Posts: 70
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2018 2:47 pm

Re: MX 17 Repository: The Pale Moon Browser Thread

#42 Post by Kulmbacher » Sun May 13, 2018 4:08 am

PaleMoon 27.9.1 (64) told me yesterday "NoScript is known to cause security or stability issues"
see http://blocklist.palemoon.org/info/?id=pm112

Severity level 1: You will be warned and recommended to disable this extension, but can continue to use it if you so wish after confirmation.


Using Palemoon since years, first time they told me to disable something, hmh ...

User avatar
Redacted
Forum Regular
Forum Regular
Posts: 127
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2017 6:53 am

Re: MX 17 Repository: The Pale Moon Browser Thread

#43 Post by Redacted » Sun May 13, 2018 5:42 am

Kulmbacher wrote:
Sun May 13, 2018 4:08 am
PaleMoon 27.9.1 (64) told me yesterday "NoScript is known to cause security or stability issues"
You can disable the extension blocklist in about:config.
However, be warned: At the Pale Moon forums the developer says that you absolutely shouldn't do that for security reasons.
I have done it because the warning kept popping up, and I don't want to go without NoScript.
MX 17.1

User avatar
Protokol
Forum Novice
Forum  Novice
Posts: 13
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2018 10:46 am

Re: MX 17 Repository: The Pale Moon Browser Thread

#44 Post by Protokol » Sun May 13, 2018 5:46 am

well :
https://sysdfree.wordpress.com/2018/05/11/169/ & https://sysdfree.wordpress.com/2018/05/12/214/

same for me, issue with noscript extension so I disabled > extensions.blocklist.enabled;false
(i know I know, but I'll take the risk)
Laptop ASUSTeK product: F7F 2008 Intel Core Duo T2250
Kernel: 4.15.0-1-686 i686 32 bits
Desktop: Xfce 4.12.3 Distro: MX-17_386 Horizon December 15, 2017
Graphics: Intel Mobile 945GM/GMS 943/940GML
Ram : 2GB

User avatar
fehlix
Forum Guide
Forum Guide
Posts: 1730
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:09 pm

Re: MX 17 Repository: The Pale Moon Browser Thread

#45 Post by fehlix » Sun May 13, 2018 8:48 am

It appears rather a stability issue, than a security issue.
From palemoon web-site
http://blocklist.palemoon.org/info/?id=pm112
This is a Pale Moon specific blocklist entry.
Additional information:
NoScript is known to cause severe issues with a large (and growing) number of websites and stability issues in the browser itself, negatively influencing otherwise unrelated browser features.
It has known interop issues with Pale Moon and if you use this extension, it should be replaced with alternatives for a smooth and hassle-free browsing experience.

We cannot provide browser support as long as this extension is installed, due to the far-reaching issues in the browser. Use at your own peril.

Severity level 1: You will be warned and recommended to disable this extension, but can continue to use it if you so wish after confirmation.
Gigabyte Z77M-D3H, Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2 (Quad core), 32GB RAM,
GeForce GTX 770, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 500GB, Seagate Barracuda 4TB

User avatar
Redacted
Forum Regular
Forum Regular
Posts: 127
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2017 6:53 am

Re: MX 17 Repository: The Pale Moon Browser Thread

#46 Post by Redacted » Sun May 13, 2018 9:15 am

I have seen absolutely no severe issues using PM and NS for the year or so I've been using them.
NoScript will obviously "break" pages that use scripts, that's what it's meant to do.
I fully understand not wanting to constantly give support when people don't know how to use NS, but I don't get labeling it as a security and stability issue.
Am I missing something?
MX 17.1

User avatar
fehlix
Forum Guide
Forum Guide
Posts: 1730
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:09 pm

Re: MX 17 Repository: The Pale Moon Browser Thread

#47 Post by fehlix » Sun May 13, 2018 10:51 am

Redacted wrote:
Sun May 13, 2018 9:15 am
...Am I missing something?...
The palemoon guys are concerned about stability, that seems to be their man issue, IMHO.
I've long time ago switched from noscript to umatrix with palemoon (and all my other browsers I run),
which is still available for palemoon. I do feel it's superiour to noscript,
but you'll need first understand the concept of umatrix a bit as you can
fintune on resoucrece level of a web-site to build filter-rules, but YMMV.
Gigabyte Z77M-D3H, Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2 (Quad core), 32GB RAM,
GeForce GTX 770, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 500GB, Seagate Barracuda 4TB

User avatar
Redacted
Forum Regular
Forum Regular
Posts: 127
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2017 6:53 am

Re: MX 17 Repository: The Pale Moon Browser Thread

#48 Post by Redacted » Sun May 13, 2018 12:16 pm

fehlix wrote:
Sun May 13, 2018 10:51 am
I've long time ago switched from noscript to umatrix with palemoon (and all my other browsers I run),
which is still available for palemoon. I do feel it's superiour to noscript...
Thanks for the thoughts, fehlix. I know there's a steep learning curve, but I do need to look into it.
MX 17.1

linwinux

Re: MX 17 Repository: The Pale Moon Browser Thread

#49 Post by linwinux » Mon May 14, 2018 4:23 am

linwinux wrote:
Thu May 10, 2018 8:17 am
Hi guys, not a lot of time todyay, so just a quick note (yeah right, right?) ;)

PALEMOON is the culprit. If my system runs stable without any hitches for a few days, while using nothing but FF and keeping it open (minimized) on the screen, followed by then opening Palemoon .... bamm, that weird crash thingie whatever it is, occurs. I can duplicate it without a problem and there does appear an x-screensaver message of sorts with 2 errors on the screen. As stated, I can duplicate this and so far only palemoon has been able to cause this on my machine. I took photos of the screen, just don't have time to upload them today.

No, please don't advise not to use a screensaver. If any fix on MX requires the lack of using a screensaver ... then screensavers should be removed from MX. That would be the correct solution, instead of implying that something which is used by countless millions of people, should not be used anymore. I'll be back tomorrow to post those photos. Screenshots of the full problem are impossible because every time that the mouse is clicked or a keyboard key tapped, the screen changes again ... eventually returning to normal. Happy Fathersday for all of you Dads out there (in Germany) !!! :happy:
Alright, that's it, no more Palemoon for me. For the past 3 days I had my screensaver completely disabled, not even using a black screen ... just no screensaver at all ... rebooted the system too ... and since then I've had this weird screen problem occur twice on me in the past 3 days. There'S no doubt in my mind that there's something weird going on with Palemoon. I've had this happen on a fairly new 6 core AMD machine, and I've also had this happen on a 10 year old Acer dual-core laptop. The only thing that's triggered this weird screen issue, was clicking on the Palemoon symbol in order to use the Palemoon browser. On the Acer there was no other browser open at the same time, and on my newer 6 core AMD setup I had FF already open, but minimized. The only common denominator that I can find with this issue, is starting palemoon ... :frown:

.
screenrage04.jpg
screenrage03.jpg
screenrage02.jpg
screenrage01.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Last edited by linwinux on Mon May 14, 2018 4:31 am, edited 1 time in total.

linwinux

Re: MX 17 Repository: The Pale Moon Browser Thread

#50 Post by linwinux » Mon May 14, 2018 4:28 am

Hmm, something odd is going on with the forum attachments too. I tried attaching 4 images. The largest one was 209KB which by todays Gigabyte/Terabyte HDD standards is already itty bitty teeny tine. Two of the other images were below 200KB. After a couple of minutes, three of the images were repalced with ... no longer available ... messages. Larger images which show the entire problem on a screen are really difficult to save in lower size without losing quite a bit of image quality and many if not most people don't even know how to compress an image that small. 400KB would be really nice to have ... 10 images only being 4MB in size ...

.

Post Reply

Return to “Package Requests/Status - MX 17”