Welcome!

The kernel problem with recent updates has been solved. Find the solution here

Important information
-- Required MX 15/16 Repository Changes
-- Information on torrent hosting changes
-- Information on MX15/16 GPG Keys
-- Spectre and Meltdown vulnerabilities

News
-- Introducing our new Website
-- MX Linux on social media: here

Current releases
-- MX-18.3 Point Release release info here
-- Migration Information to MX-18 here
-- antiX-17.4.1 release info here

New users
-- Please read this first, and don't forget to add system and hardware information to posts!
-- Here are the Forum Rules

MX 17/18 Repository: The Liquorix Kernel Thread

KoO
Forum Regular
Forum Regular
Posts: 557
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2017 1:21 am

Re: MX 17/18 Repository: The Liquorix Kernel Thread

#141

Post by KoO » Fri Apr 19, 2019 1:00 pm

Some thing Different..

Code: Select all

 System:    Host: debian10 Kernel: 5.0.0-8.1-liquorix-amd64 x86_64 bits: 64 Desktop: i3 4.16.1-169-g60a6d149 
           Distro: Debian GNU/Linux buster/sid 
Machine:   Type: Desktop System: ASUS product: All Series v: N/A serial: <root required> 
           Mobo: ASUSTeK model: H97I-PLUS v: Rev X.0x serial: <root required> UEFI: American Megatrends v: 3602 
           date: 04/08/2018 
CPU:       Topology: Quad Core model: Intel Xeon E3-1241 v3 bits: 64 type: MT MCP L2 cache: 8192 KiB 
           Speed: 1256 MHz min/max: 800/3900 MHz Core speeds (MHz): 1: 940 2: 943 3: 940 4: 944 5: 872 6: 969 7: 955 8: 947 
Graphics:  Device-1: NVIDIA GM204 [GeForce GTX 970] driver: nvidia v: 418.56 
           Display: x11 server: X.Org 1.20.3 driver: nvidia resolution: 2560x1440~60Hz 
           OpenGL: renderer: GeForce GTX 970/PCIe/SSE2 v: 4.6.0 NVIDIA 418.56 
Audio:     Device-1: Intel 9 Series Family HD Audio driver: snd_hda_intel 
           Device-2: NVIDIA GM204 High Definition Audio driver: snd_hda_intel 
           Device-3: TEAC type: USB driver: hid-generic,snd-usb-audio,usbhid 
           Device-4: C-Media type: USB driver: hid-generic,snd-usb-audio,usbhid 
           Sound Server: ALSA v: k5.0.0-8.1-liquorix-amd64 
Network:   Device-1: Intel Ethernet I218-V driver: e1000e 
           IF: eno1 state: up speed: 1000 Mbps duplex: full mac: 08:62:66:c7:c3:66 
Drives:    Local Storage: total: 931.52 GiB used: 382.44 GiB (41.1%) 
           ID-1: /dev/sda vendor: Samsung model: SSD 860 EVO 500GB size: 465.76 GiB 
           ID-2: /dev/sdb vendor: Samsung model: SSD 850 EVO 500GB size: 465.76 GiB 
Partition: ID-1: / size: 143.19 GiB used: 26.27 GiB (18.3%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/sda4 
           ID-2: swap-1 size: 4.0 MiB used: 3.9 MiB (97.7%) fs: swap dev: /dev/sda6 
Sensors:   System Temperatures: cpu: 33.5 C mobo: 27.8 C gpu: nvidia temp: 52 C 
           Fan Speeds (RPM): cpu: 2057 fan-1: 916 fan-3: 922 fan-4: 0 fan-5: 0 gpu: nvidia fan: 0% 
Info:      Processes: 224 Uptime: 8h 15m Memory: 15.61 GiB used: 1.41 GiB (9.0%) Shell: bash inxi: 3.0.32
Main : MX18.3 Debian10 (i3) , Liquorix , Intel Xeon E3-1241 v3 , 16gb , GTX970 . :linuxlove:
Lenovo T430 : Debian10 antiX17 (i3) , 4.20.12 , i5 , 12gb .
Lenovo X220 : Debian10 antiX17 (i3) , 4.19.170 , i5 , 8gb . BiosMod 1.46

Friedrich
Forum Novice
Forum  Novice
Posts: 96
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2018 2:50 am

Re: MX 17/18 Repository: The Liquorix Kernel Thread

#142

Post by Friedrich » Fri Apr 19, 2019 1:19 pm

Stevo wrote:
Sat Apr 13, 2019 5:57 pm
caprea wrote:
Sat Apr 13, 2019 4:39 pm
The patched Nvidia 340xx legacy driver runs well here with 5.0.0-7.1-liquorix
...
Cool! Anti may want to add it to the antiX repos for 5.0 kernels, too. Nvidia may have given up on the 304xx drivers--at least Arch isn't even providing those any longer.
The patched Nvidia 304xx legacy driver also runs well here with 5.0.0-7.1-liquorix.
(And many (all?) other kernels: 4.9;4.15;4.20; only exception: 4.19.0.1)

User avatar
Stevo
Developer
Posts: 20110
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:07 pm

Re: MX 17/18 Repository: The Liquorix Kernel Thread

#143

Post by Stevo » Mon Jun 03, 2019 4:08 pm

We've now added the 5.1-1 (based on the 5.1.6 vanilla) Liquorix kernel, as well as removed all but the last 5.0 packages. The following DKMS drivers will build on it, at least on my tests for 64-bit.

Patched broadcom-sta-dkms in our test repo.
Virtual Box 5.2.30 in the test repo.
Nvidia driver 4.18.74 in the test repo.
Ndiswrapper in the main repo.

Friedrich
Forum Novice
Forum  Novice
Posts: 96
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2018 2:50 am

Re: MX 17/18 Repository: The Liquorix Kernel Thread

#144

Post by Friedrich » Tue Jun 04, 2019 9:35 am

Stevo wrote:
Mon Jun 03, 2019 4:08 pm
We've now added the 5.1-1 (based on the 5.1.6 vanilla) Liquorix kernel
You chose not to add the headers as a dependency?

User avatar
Head_on_a_Stick
Forum Regular
Forum Regular
Posts: 490
Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2019 3:37 pm

Re: MX 17/18 Repository: The Liquorix Kernel Thread

#145

Post by Head_on_a_Stick » Tue Jun 04, 2019 12:23 pm

@Stevo: did you know that Liquorix now offer stretch-based kernel versions?

https://liquorix.net/debian/dists/
"Direct action is the logical, consistent method of anarchism." — Emma Goldman

User avatar
Stevo
Developer
Posts: 20110
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:07 pm

Re: MX 17/18 Repository: The Liquorix Kernel Thread

#146

Post by Stevo » Tue Jun 04, 2019 2:47 pm

Friedrich wrote:
Tue Jun 04, 2019 9:35 am
Stevo wrote:
Mon Jun 03, 2019 4:08 pm
We've now added the 5.1-1 (based on the 5.1.6 vanilla) Liquorix kernel
You chose not to add the headers as a dependency?
Yes, I left the dependencies as is; they are not a hard dependency of any Debian type kernel, but the MX Package Installer does automatically install the headers along with the kernel. If you're missing them, module-assistant's "m-a prepare" command is easy enough to run to solve that issue, IMO.

User avatar
Stevo
Developer
Posts: 20110
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:07 pm

Re: MX 17/18 Repository: The Liquorix Kernel Thread

#147

Post by Stevo » Tue Jun 04, 2019 2:50 pm

Head_on_a_Stick wrote:
Tue Jun 04, 2019 12:23 pm
@Stevo: did you know that Liquorix now offer stretch-based kernel versions?

https://liquorix.net/debian/dists/
Yes, perhaps we can switch the package installer to use their repo now. It would save me a couple of hours a week compiling time...

Friedrich
Forum Novice
Forum  Novice
Posts: 96
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2018 2:50 am

Re: MX 17/18 Repository: The Liquorix Kernel Thread

#148

Post by Friedrich » Tue Jun 04, 2019 4:48 pm

Stevo wrote:
Tue Jun 04, 2019 2:47 pm
.. the MX Package Installer does automatically install the headers along with the kernel.
Seems it does not. That's why I am asking.
Tested on 2 separate PC.

User avatar
Stevo
Developer
Posts: 20110
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:07 pm

Re: MX 17/18 Repository: The Liquorix Kernel Thread

#149

Post by Stevo » Tue Jun 04, 2019 7:09 pm

Can you enable the MX test repo in the MX repo manager, update the apt database

Code: Select all

sudo apt update
Then check:

Code: Select all

apt policy linux-headers-5.1.0*
If not installed, run

Code: Select all

sudo m-a prepare 
as above to get them, then disable the test repo in Repo Man.

I'll check to see what's wrong with the package installer, though we are going to switch to the Liquorix repo soon.

User avatar
mmikeinsantarosa
Developer
Posts: 2989
Joined: Thu May 01, 2014 10:12 am

Re: MX 17/18 Repository: The Liquorix Kernel Thread

#150

Post by mmikeinsantarosa » Wed Jun 05, 2019 9:42 am

Your latest liquorix kernel can actually run my mobile broadband card but I did have to upgrade virtualbox to the latest in test to get a /dev/vboxdrv to show up. :number1:
LT: MX18.2 Quad Core model: Intel Core i7-6820HQ Kernel: 5.0.0-7.1-liquorix-amd64 x86_64

Post Reply

Return to “Package Requests/Status - MX 17/18”