I'd love to see it, but unless the project manager and all the other contributors are onboard it's wishful thinking on my part. You would know as much as anybody what the support of those actually doing the work might be. I can't imagine any community members having an objection to the developers doing whatever they want to do.BitJam wrote:I'm sure there are many valid arguments for not wanting to go ahead with an MX-KDE iso.
My comments weren't intended to bring this touchy subject up again; rather, they were to point out that for me, the lack of an official MX-KDE spin isn't the serious inhibitor I thought it would be for me to use MX in the future as my mainstay.