Is This Safe? / Solved

Help on all MX Re-spins
Message
Author
User avatar
Frank_v7
Posts: 29
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 11:55 am

Is This Safe? / Solved

#1 Post by Frank_v7 »

My Apt Notifier is showing this:
apt-get upgrade
Reading package lists...
Building dependency tree...
Reading state information...
The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required:
libavcodec-ffmpeg56 (2.8.6-1mx150+1)
libavutil-ffmpeg54 (2.8.6-1mx150+1)
libconfig-general-perl (2.56-1)
libextutils-depends-perl (0.402-1)
libextutils-pkgconfig-perl (1.15-1)
libfilesys-df-perl (0.92-5+b1)
libfont-ttf-perl (1.04-1)
libfreerdp-rail1.1 (1.1.0~git20140921.1.440916e+dfsg1-4)
libgles1-mesa (10.3.2-1+deb8u1)
libgoo-canvas-perl (0.06-2+b1)
libgoocanvas-common (0.15-1.1)
libgoocanvas3 (0.15-1.1)
libgtk2-ex-simple-list-perl (0.50-2)
libgtk2-imageview-perl (0.05-2+b1)
libgtkimageview0 (1.6.4+dfsg-0.1)
liblivemedia23 (2014.01.13-1)
liblog-log4perl-perl (1.44-1)
libnuma1 (2.0.10-1)
libossp-uuid-perl (1.6.2-1.5+b1)
libossp-uuid16 (1.6.2-1.5+b1)
libpdf-api2-perl (2.023-1)
libpostproc52 (0.git20120821-4)
libproc-processtable-perl (0.51-1)
libproxy-tools (0.4.11-4+b2)
libreadonly-perl (2.000-1)
libsane-perl (0.05-2+b2)
libset-intspan-perl (1.19-1)
libsnappy1 (1.1.2-3)
libswresample-ffmpeg1 (2.8.6-1mx150+1)
libtiff-tools (4.0.3-12.3+deb8u1)
libusageenvironment1 (2014.01.13-1)
libx265-59 (1.7-2mx150+1)
pkg-config (0.28-1)
python-gst0.10 (0.10.22-3)
Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove them.
The following packages will be upgraded:
mx-snapshot (16.11mx16 => 16.11mx16+1)
1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 79.5 kB of archives.
After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used.

Is it "safe" to remove all these packages? :confused:
Last edited by Frank_v7 on Thu Nov 03, 2016 2:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Frank_v7
Posts: 29
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 11:55 am

Re: Is This Safe?

#2 Post by Frank_v7 »

I just used Synaptic to upgrade mx-snapshot. Going to let those files that are "no longer required" hang around for a while. Can't hurt to just ignore them can it?

User avatar
v3g4n
Posts: 654
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2016 8:20 pm

Re: Is This Safe?

#3 Post by v3g4n »

I will fire up a VM over lunch in order to confirm that the packages it wants to remove are correct. Will let you know what I find in a bit.
Last edited by v3g4n on Thu Nov 03, 2016 1:57 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
sanlav
Posts: 16
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 10:03 pm

Re: Is This Safe?

#4 Post by sanlav »

i get this glitch few dozens times in many Debian-based distros. It happens only with Synaptic, not with apt-get.

As a simple rule of thumb, if Synaptic ask me to remove more than 5 packages, I simply ignore it. Sometimes, if your choice is to remove them anyway, you will discover that possibly many packs installed after your original install will need to be removed also ...

After an full update via apt-get followed by an Synaptic reload things should go back to normal.

User avatar
v3g4n
Posts: 654
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2016 8:20 pm

Re: Is This Safe?

#5 Post by v3g4n »

Hmm, I just ran through 40ish updates on a MX15 VM and didn't see anything for autoremove. I guess I didn't ask, is this a MX15 or MX16 beta install?
Could you please post the output of inxi -r?

User avatar
Frank_v7
Posts: 29
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 11:55 am

Re: Is This Safe?

#6 Post by Frank_v7 »

This is what I get running inxi -r:
Repos: Active apt sources in file: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/antix.list
deb http://antix.daveserver.info/jessie/ jessie main
Active apt sources in file: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian.list
deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ jessie main contrib non-free
deb http://security.debian.org/ jessie/updates main contrib non-free
deb http://www.deb-multimedia.org/ jessie non-free main
Active apt sources in file: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/mx.list
deb http://mxrepo.com/mx/repo/ mx15 main non-free

P.S. Just ran Synaptic and it all went away. Guess it's a non-issue now!

User avatar
anticapitalista
Developer
Posts: 4167
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 10:40 am

Re: Is This Safe?

#7 Post by anticapitalista »

Don't use the

Code: Select all

 deb http://www.deb-multimedia.org/ jessie non-free main 
multimedia repo.
It is asking for trouble (and why it is not used as default)
anticapitalista
Reg. linux user #395339.

Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.

antiX with runit - lean and mean.
https://antixlinux.com

User avatar
Frank_v7
Posts: 29
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 11:55 am

Re: Is This Safe?

#8 Post by Frank_v7 »

anticapitalista wrote:Don't use the

Code: Select all

 deb http://www.deb-multimedia.org/ jessie non-free main 
multimedia repo.
It is asking for trouble (and why it is not used as default)
What should I use for mulitmedia?

User avatar
dolphin_oracle
Developer
Posts: 20035
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 1:17 pm

Re: Is This Safe?

#9 Post by dolphin_oracle »

Frank_v7 wrote:
anticapitalista wrote:Don't use the

Code: Select all

 deb http://www.deb-multimedia.org/ jessie non-free main 
multimedia repo.
It is asking for trouble (and why it is not used as default)
What should I use for mulitmedia?
use our hosted packages. is there something in deb-multimedia (which is not run by debian by the way) you need?

or, like our mx-packageinstaller does for a few apps, enable deb-multi, install app, then disable deb-multi.
http://www.youtube.com/runwiththedolphin
lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme Gen 4 - MX-23
FYI: mx "test" repo is not the same thing as debian testing repo.

User avatar
Frank_v7
Posts: 29
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 11:55 am

Re: Is This Safe? / Solved

#10 Post by Frank_v7 »

Thanks! Have everything I need. Disabled it!

Post Reply

Return to “MX Respins”