Welcome!
Important information
-- Spectre and Meltdown vulnerabilities
-- Change in MX sources

News
-- MX Linux on social media: here
-- Mepis support still here

Current releases
-- MX-17.1 Final release info here
-- antiX-17 release info here

New users
-- Please read this first, and don't forget to add system and hardware information to posts!
-- Here are the Forum Rules

MX 15/16 Repository: The linux-liquorix kernel thread

Message
Author
User avatar
anticapitalista
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 5737
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 10:40 am

Re: MX 15/16 Repository: The linux-liquorix kernel thread

#241 Post by anticapitalista » Fri Oct 20, 2017 6:36 pm

It should turn up in synaptic.

They are here: http://repo.antixlinux.com/stretch/pool ... amd64-smp/
anticapitalista
Reg. linux user #395339.

Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.

antiX-17 "Heather Heyer" - lean and mean.
https://antixlinux.com

User avatar
kmathern
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 9359
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:26 pm

Re: MX 15/16 Repository: The linux-liquorix kernel thread

#242 Post by kmathern » Fri Oct 20, 2017 6:49 pm

anticapitalista wrote:It should turn up in synaptic.

They are here: http://repo.antixlinux.com/stretch/pool/main/l/linux-4.13.4-antix.1-amd64-smp/
The "stretch" I highlighted means it's in the antiX-17 / MX-17 repos, any plans to add it to the MX-15/16 (jessie) repos ?

User avatar
anticapitalista
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 5737
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 10:40 am

Re: MX 15/16 Repository: The linux-liquorix kernel thread

#243 Post by anticapitalista » Fri Oct 20, 2017 6:53 pm

kmathern wrote:
anticapitalista wrote:It should turn up in synaptic.

They are here: http://repo.antixlinux.com/stretch/pool/main/l/linux-4.13.4-antix.1-amd64-smp/
The "stretch" I highlighted means it's in the antiX-17 / MX-17 repos, any plans to add it to the MX-15/16 repos ?
It is probably not a good idea since the new kernel was built with gcc6.3 while MX-15 uses gcc4.9 (I think).
Ah! - Now I see the thread is for MX-15/16, whoops.
anticapitalista
Reg. linux user #395339.

Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.

antiX-17 "Heather Heyer" - lean and mean.
https://antixlinux.com

User avatar
kmathern
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 9359
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:26 pm

Re: MX 15/16 Repository: The linux-liquorix kernel thread

#244 Post by kmathern » Fri Oct 20, 2017 7:14 pm

anticapitalista wrote:It is probably not a good idea since the new kernel was built with gcc6.3 while MX-15 uses gcc4.9 (I think).
I've been using a 4.14 rc1 kernel for a little over a month now without any problem, it was built with gcc 7.2.0.
I can't install it's linux-headers package(s) but I don't need to build kernel modules for anything.

Code: Select all

$ inxi -Sxxx
System:    Host: mx1 Kernel: 4.14.0-041400rc1-generic x86_64 (64 bit gcc: 7.2.0)
           Desktop: Xfce 4.12.3 (Gtk 2.24.25) info: xfce4-panel dm: lightdm
           Distro: MX-16_x64 Metamorphosis 12 December 2016

User avatar
Stevo
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 16582
Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:07 pm

Re: MX 15/16 Repository: The linux-liquorix kernel thread

#245 Post by Stevo » Fri Oct 20, 2017 7:33 pm

mmikeinsantarosa wrote:
Jerry3904 wrote:That's cause all the neighbors hogging the bandwidth are, ummm, out of commission?
ouch
It's raining here today and normally, I'd throw a couple sticks in the fireplace but most people are still a tad hypersensitive to chimney smoke... maybe next weekend :p
You could test that by rebooting to the older kernel and see if the speed goes down again--and do multiple runs. SCIENCE!!

User avatar
mmikeinsantarosa
Forum Guide
Forum Guide
Posts: 2466
Joined: Thu May 01, 2014 10:12 am

Re: MX 15/16 Repository: The linux-liquorix kernel thread

#246 Post by mmikeinsantarosa » Fri Oct 20, 2017 7:57 pm

Stevo wrote:
mmikeinsantarosa wrote:
Jerry3904 wrote:That's cause all the neighbors hogging the bandwidth are, ummm, out of commission?
ouch
It's raining here today and normally, I'd throw a couple sticks in the fireplace but most people are still a tad hypersensitive to chimney smoke... maybe next weekend :p
You could test that by rebooting to the older kernel and see if the speed goes down again--and do multiple runs. SCIENCE!!
What!? You want me to allow facts to mess up my preconceived opinion? :eek:

But it feels Sooo good to think it's running faster now :p
LT: MX17.1 Quad Core model: Intel Core i7-6820HQ Kernel: 4.16.0-12.1-liquorix-amd64 (64 bit)
DT: Intel(R) Core i5-3.1GHz Kernel~3.9-1-mepis64 x86_64

User avatar
entropyfoe
Forum Regular
Forum Regular
Posts: 808
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 11:42 am

Re: MX 15/16 Repository: The linux-liquorix kernel thread

#247 Post by entropyfoe » Sat Oct 21, 2017 10:08 am

Anticapitalista wrote...
It should turn up in synaptic.
They are here: http://repo.antixlinux.com/stretch/pool ... amd64-smp/
So I enabled the test repos, and selected that 4.13, and told it to install.

But I am scared to commit to that because it says 152 packages will be held back and not upgraded one new package will be installed.



So why are 152 packaged held back?


After I install the linux image, then according to the manual, I install the corresponding headers?
Then reboot, maybe update grub?

Also in antiX, the package installer does not show these newer kernels.
That would be more automated? But does not offer the options.
Asus Prime 370X-Pro
AMD Ryzen 1600X (6 cores @ 3.6 GHz)
16 Gig DDR4 3200 (G Skill)
Nvidia -MSI GeForce GT 710 fanless
Samsung 960 NVMe SSD nvme0n1 P1,P2, and P3=MX-17.1, P4=antiX-17
1TB SSD sda1= Data, 2TB WD =backups
on-board ethernet & sound

User avatar
anticapitalista
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 5737
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 10:40 am

Re: MX 15/16 Repository: The linux-liquorix kernel thread

#248 Post by anticapitalista » Sat Oct 21, 2017 10:14 am

Which version of antiX and MX are you using?

As I posted in reply to kmathern

"Ah! - Now I see the thread is for MX-15/16, whoops."

The kernels I linked to are for a stretch release (MX-17, antiX-17)
anticapitalista
Reg. linux user #395339.

Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.

antiX-17 "Heather Heyer" - lean and mean.
https://antixlinux.com

User avatar
entropyfoe
Forum Regular
Forum Regular
Posts: 808
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 11:42 am

Re: MX 15/16 Repository: The linux-liquorix kernel thread

#249 Post by entropyfoe » Sat Oct 21, 2017 10:19 am

I am experimenting with the new kernel onto my antiX 17 beta 2 fully updated.

Anti, thanks for the fast response.
Last edited by entropyfoe on Sat Oct 21, 2017 10:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
Asus Prime 370X-Pro
AMD Ryzen 1600X (6 cores @ 3.6 GHz)
16 Gig DDR4 3200 (G Skill)
Nvidia -MSI GeForce GT 710 fanless
Samsung 960 NVMe SSD nvme0n1 P1,P2, and P3=MX-17.1, P4=antiX-17
1TB SSD sda1= Data, 2TB WD =backups
on-board ethernet & sound

User avatar
entropyfoe
Forum Regular
Forum Regular
Posts: 808
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 11:42 am

Re: MX 15/16 Repository: The linux-liquorix kernel thread

#250 Post by entropyfoe » Sat Oct 21, 2017 10:22 am

In my MX, I run 16.1 fully updated, where my grub resides. So, if a kernel upgrade goes badly, I can still boot into MX.
But I will try your newest 4.13 64 bit kernel if I can in antiX.

If things go poorly, I will download the antiX 17 rc1 and reinstall over the beta2.

I just did the BIOS update to 0902, the latest, searching for stability on this recent hardware.

It's all in the sigline.
Asus Prime 370X-Pro
AMD Ryzen 1600X (6 cores @ 3.6 GHz)
16 Gig DDR4 3200 (G Skill)
Nvidia -MSI GeForce GT 710 fanless
Samsung 960 NVMe SSD nvme0n1 P1,P2, and P3=MX-17.1, P4=antiX-17
1TB SSD sda1= Data, 2TB WD =backups
on-board ethernet & sound

Post Reply

Return to “Package Requests/Status - MX-15/16”