now everything seem to be ok ! Only 1 package.
Shoud I try to upgrade to v 8 ?
MX Package Installer - two options of the same package ? [Solved]
Re: MX Package Installer - two options of the same package ?
MX-23 / KDE Plasma 5.27.5
Kernel: 6.5
Be patient !!
What seams easy for you now, for a newbie might be a monumental helping hand.
An efficient pack will move as fast as the slowest member.
Kernel: 6.5
Be patient !!
What seams easy for you now, for a newbie might be a monumental helping hand.
An efficient pack will move as fast as the slowest member.
Re: MX Package Installer - two options of the same package ? [Solved]
Change first MX-repo to another one.
Gigabyte Z77M-D3H, Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2 (Quad core), 32GB RAM,
GeForce GTX 770, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 500GB, Seagate Barracuda 4TB
GeForce GTX 770, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 500GB, Seagate Barracuda 4TB
Re: MX Package Installer - two options of the same package ?
it.mxrepo.com is updating properly now, but it may take a while to finish.
HP Pavillion TP01, AMD Ryzen 3 5300G (quad core), Crucial 500GB SSD, Toshiba 6TB 7200rpm
Dell Inspiron 15, AMD Ryzen 7 2700u (quad core). Sabrent 500GB nvme, Seagate 1TB
Dell Inspiron 15, AMD Ryzen 7 2700u (quad core). Sabrent 500GB nvme, Seagate 1TB
Re: MX Package Installer - two options of the same package ?
now it's working.
Thank you all !
MX-23 / KDE Plasma 5.27.5
Kernel: 6.5
Be patient !!
What seams easy for you now, for a newbie might be a monumental helping hand.
An efficient pack will move as fast as the slowest member.
Kernel: 6.5
Be patient !!
What seams easy for you now, for a newbie might be a monumental helping hand.
An efficient pack will move as fast as the slowest member.
Re: MX Package Installer - two options of the same package ?
Hello again,
I have a different problem now, still with Wine.
I'm trying to install winehq-staging on a fresh MX install.
in MX Package Installer - MX Test Repo I get this error in console :
So I see this :
but I don't undestand what is the difference betwen wine-staging and winehq-staging.
I know that in the Wine Wiki is recommended : sudo apt install --install-recommends winehq-staging
Am I doing something wrong ? I tried switching the repos but I get the same error.
I have a different problem now, still with Wine.
I'm trying to install winehq-staging on a fresh MX install.
in MX Package Installer - MX Test Repo I get this error in console :
Code: Select all
Hit:1 http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye-security InRelease
Hit:2 http://deb.debian.org/debian bullseye-updates InRelease
Hit:3 http://deb.debian.org/debian bullseye InRelease
Hit:4 http://deb.debian.org/debian bullseye-backports InRelease
Hit:5 http://it.mxrepo.com/mx/repo bullseye InRelease
Get:6 http://it.mxrepo.com/mx/testrepo bullseye InRelease [6.769 B]
Get:7 http://it.mxrepo.com/mx/testrepo bullseye/test i386 Packages [462 kB]
Get:8 http://it.mxrepo.com/mx/testrepo bullseye/test amd64 Packages [471 kB]
Get:9 http://it.mxrepo.com/mx/testrepo bullseye/test i386 Contents (deb) [2.351 kB]
Get:10 http://it.mxrepo.com/mx/testrepo bullseye/test amd64 Contents (deb) [2.643 kB]
Fetched 5.935 kB in 4s (1.621 kB/s)
Reading package lists...
Reading package lists...
Building dependency tree...
Reading state information...
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
winehq-staging : Depends: wine-staging (= 8.0-0rc5-0mx21+1)
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
Hit:1 http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye-security InRelease
Hit:2 http://deb.debian.org/debian bullseye-updates InRelease
Get:3 http://it.mxrepo.com/mx/repo bullseye InRelease [19,9 kB]
Hit:4 http://deb.debian.org/debian bullseye InRelease
Hit:5 http://deb.debian.org/debian bullseye-backports InRelease
Get:6 http://it.mxrepo.com/mx/repo bullseye/main i386 Packages [358 kB]
Get:7 http://it.mxrepo.com/mx/repo bullseye/main amd64 Packages [364 kB]
Fetched 742 kB in 2s (475 kB/s)
Reading package lists...
Code: Select all
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
winehq-staging : Depends: wine-staging (= 8.0-0rc5-0mx21+1)
I know that in the Wine Wiki is recommended : sudo apt install --install-recommends winehq-staging
Am I doing something wrong ? I tried switching the repos but I get the same error.
Code: Select all
System: Kernel: 6.1.0-2mx-amd64 [6.1.7-1~mx21+1] x86_64 bits: 64 compiler: gcc v: 10.2.1
parameters: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-6.1.0-2mx-amd64
root=UUID=<filter> ro quiet splash
Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.20.5 wm: kwin_x11 vt: 7 dm: SDDM
Distro: MX-21.3_KDE_x64 Wildflower January 15 2023
base: Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)
Machine: Type: Laptop System: Hewlett-Packard product: HP EliteBook 840 G2 v: A3009D510303
serial: <filter> Chassis: type: 10 serial: <filter>
Mobo: Hewlett-Packard model: 2216 v: KBC Version 96.5B serial: <filter>
UEFI: Hewlett-Packard v: M71 Ver. 01.31 date: 02/24/2020
Battery: ID-1: BAT0 charge: 24.8 Wh (62.6%) condition: 39.6/39.6 Wh (100.0%) volts: 11.3
min: 11.4 model: Hewlett-Packard Primary type: Li-ion serial: <filter>
status: Discharging
CPU: Info: Dual Core model: Intel Core i5-5200U bits: 64 type: MT MCP arch: Broadwell
family: 6 model-id: 3D (61) stepping: 4 microcode: 2F cache: L2: 3 MiB
flags: avx avx2 lm nx pae sse sse2 sse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 ssse3 vmx bogomips: 17558
Speed: 1784 MHz min/max: 500/2700 MHz Core speeds (MHz): 1: 1784 2: 1930 3: 1624
4: 1796
Vulnerabilities: Type: itlb_multihit status: KVM: VMX disabled
Type: l1tf mitigation: PTE Inversion; VMX: conditional cache flushes, SMT vulnerable
Type: mds mitigation: Clear CPU buffers; SMT vulnerable
Type: meltdown mitigation: PTI
Type: mmio_stale_data status: Unknown: No mitigations
Type: retbleed status: Not affected
Type: spec_store_bypass mitigation: Speculative Store Bypass disabled via prctl
Type: spectre_v1 mitigation: usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization
Type: spectre_v2 mitigation: Retpolines, IBPB: conditional, IBRS_FW, STIBP:
conditional, RSB filling, PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected
Type: srbds mitigation: Microcode
Type: tsx_async_abort status: Not affected
Graphics: Device-1: Intel HD Graphics 5500
vendor: Hewlett-Packard ZBook 15u G2 Mobile Workstation driver: i915 v: kernel
bus-ID: 00:02.0 chip-ID: 8086:1616 class-ID: 0300
Device-2: Chicony HP HD Webcam type: USB driver: uvcvideo bus-ID: 2-7:6
chip-ID: 04f2:b477 class-ID: 0e02 serial: <filter>
Display: x11 server: X.Org 1.20.14 compositor: kwin_x11 driver: loaded: modesetting
unloaded: fbdev,vesa display-ID: :0 screens: 1
Screen-1: 0 s-res: 1600x900 s-dpi: 96 s-size: 423x238mm (16.7x9.4")
s-diag: 485mm (19.1")
Monitor-1: eDP-1 res: 1600x900 hz: 60 dpi: 132 size: 309x174mm (12.2x6.9")
diag: 355mm (14")
OpenGL: renderer: Mesa Intel HD Graphics 5500 (BDW GT2) v: 4.6 Mesa 22.0.5
direct render: Yes
Audio: Device-1: Intel Broadwell-U Audio vendor: Hewlett-Packard driver: snd_hda_intel
v: kernel bus-ID: 00:03.0 chip-ID: 8086:160c class-ID: 0403
Device-2: Intel Wildcat Point-LP High Definition Audio vendor: Hewlett-Packard
driver: snd_hda_intel v: kernel bus-ID: 00:1b.0 chip-ID: 8086:9ca0 class-ID: 0403
Sound Server-1: ALSA v: k6.1.0-2mx-amd64 running: yes
Sound Server-2: PulseAudio v: 14.2 running: yes
Network: Device-1: Intel Ethernet I218-LM vendor: Hewlett-Packard driver: e1000e v: kernel
port: 5080 bus-ID: 00:19.0 chip-ID: 8086:15a2 class-ID: 0200
IF: eth0 state: down mac: <filter>
Device-2: Intel Wireless 7265 driver: iwlwifi v: kernel modules: wl port: ef80
bus-ID: 03:00.0 chip-ID: 8086:095a class-ID: 0280
IF: wlan0 state: up mac: <filter>
Device-3: HP HP hs3110 HSPA+ Mobile Broadband Device type: USB driver: N/A
bus-ID: 2-6:5 chip-ID: 03f0:521d class-ID: ff00
Bluetooth: Device-1: Intel Bluetooth wireless interface type: USB driver: btusb v: 0.8
bus-ID: 2-4:3 chip-ID: 8087:0a2a class-ID: e001
Report: hciconfig ID: hci0 rfk-id: 1 state: down bt-service: N/A rfk-block:
hardware: no software: no address: <filter>
Info: acl-mtu: 1021:5 sco-mtu: 96:6 link-policy: rswitch hold sniff
link-mode: slave accept
Drives: Local Storage: total: 465.76 GiB used: 16.33 GiB (3.5%)
SMART Message: Unable to run smartctl. Root privileges required.
ID-1: /dev/sda maj-min: 8:0 vendor: Crucial model: CT500MX500SSD1 size: 465.76 GiB
block-size: physical: 4096 B logical: 512 B speed: 6.0 Gb/s type: SSD serial: <filter>
rev: 023 scheme: GPT
Partition: ID-1: / raw-size: 87.64 GiB size: 85.71 GiB (97.80%) used: 16.05 GiB (18.7%) fs: ext4
dev: /dev/dm-0 maj-min: 253:0 mapped: root.fsm
ID-2: /boot raw-size: 2 GiB size: 1.9 GiB (95.01%) used: 246.3 MiB (12.7%) fs: ext4
dev: /dev/sda6 maj-min: 8:6
ID-3: /boot/efi raw-size: 100 MiB size: 96 MiB (96.00%) used: 25.3 MiB (26.3%) fs: vfat
dev: /dev/sda1 maj-min: 8:1
Swap: Kernel: swappiness: 15 (default 60) cache-pressure: 100 (default)
ID-1: swap-1 type: partition size: 7.98 GiB used: 0 KiB (0.0%) priority: -2
dev: /dev/dm-1 maj-min: 253:1 mapped: swap
Sensors: System Temperatures: cpu: 40.0 C mobo: 0.0 C
Fan Speeds (RPM): N/A
Repos: Packages: note: see --pkg apt: 2294 lib: 1250 flatpak: 0
No active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list
Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian-stable-updates.list
1: deb http://deb.debian.org/debian bullseye-updates main contrib non-free
Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian.list
1: deb http://deb.debian.org/debian bullseye main contrib non-free
2: deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye-security main contrib non-free
3: deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian bullseye main contrib non-free
4: deb http://deb.debian.org/debian bullseye-backports main contrib non-free
Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/mx.list
1: deb http://it.mxrepo.com/mx/repo/ bullseye main non-free
Info: Processes: 209 Uptime: 1h 2m wakeups: 2 Memory: 7.18 GiB used: 2.39 GiB (33.3%)
Init: SysVinit v: 2.96 runlevel: 5 default: 5 tool: systemctl Compilers: gcc: N/A
alt: 10 Client: shell wrapper v: 5.1.4-release inxi: 3.3.06
Boot Mode: UEFI
MX-23 / KDE Plasma 5.27.5
Kernel: 6.5
Be patient !!
What seams easy for you now, for a newbie might be a monumental helping hand.
An efficient pack will move as fast as the slowest member.
Kernel: 6.5
Be patient !!
What seams easy for you now, for a newbie might be a monumental helping hand.
An efficient pack will move as fast as the slowest member.
Re: MX Package Installer - two options of the same package ?
Please don't post something unrelated into an old thread that is marked as [Solved] it will confuse things, people will think that the thread is solved so they will not pay attention and people who are looking for a solution will see the thread marked [Solved] and they will not understand where the solution is if you are talking about a different issue.
Re: MX Package Installer - two options of the same package ?
Sorry, I thought that this is related. Should I open another one ?Adrian wrote: ↑Mon Jan 30, 2023 3:54 pm Please don't post something unrelated into an old thread that is marked as [Solved] it will confuse things, people will think that the thread is solved so they will not pay attention and people who are looking for a solution will see the thread marked [Solved] and they will not understand where the solution is if you are talking about a different issue.
or mark this one unsolved
MX-23 / KDE Plasma 5.27.5
Kernel: 6.5
Be patient !!
What seams easy for you now, for a newbie might be a monumental helping hand.
An efficient pack will move as fast as the slowest member.
Kernel: 6.5
Be patient !!
What seams easy for you now, for a newbie might be a monumental helping hand.
An efficient pack will move as fast as the slowest member.
Re: MX Package Installer - two options of the same package ?
Was the first problem solved? If yes, then leave it "solved' if not uncheck that.
Even this is question 'is this the same problem or a different one" should not even be something that wastes time of follow forum readers, if it's not clearly the same problem, open a new thread.
Even this is question 'is this the same problem or a different one" should not even be something that wastes time of follow forum readers, if it's not clearly the same problem, open a new thread.
Re: MX Package Installer - two options of the same package ?
I created a new thread.Adrian wrote: ↑Mon Jan 30, 2023 4:01 pm Was the first problem solved? If yes, then leave it "solved' if not uncheck that.
Even this is question 'is this the same problem or a different one" should not even be something that wastes time of follow forum readers, if it's not clearly the same problem, open a new thread.
MX-23 / KDE Plasma 5.27.5
Kernel: 6.5
Be patient !!
What seams easy for you now, for a newbie might be a monumental helping hand.
An efficient pack will move as fast as the slowest member.
Kernel: 6.5
Be patient !!
What seams easy for you now, for a newbie might be a monumental helping hand.
An efficient pack will move as fast as the slowest member.