MX Package Installer - two options of the same package ?  [Solved]

Message
Author
User avatar
~FLOW~
Posts: 273
Joined: Thu May 19, 2022 12:43 pm

Re: MX Package Installer - two options of the same package ?

#11 Post by ~FLOW~ »

now everything seem to be ok ! Only 1 package.
Shoud I try to upgrade to v 8 ?
MX-23 / KDE Plasma 5.27.5
Kernel: 6.5

Be patient !!
What seams easy for you now, for a newbie might be a monumental helping hand.
An efficient pack will move as fast as the slowest member.

User avatar
fehlix
Developer
Posts: 10383
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:09 pm

Re: MX Package Installer - two options of the same package ?  [Solved]

#12 Post by fehlix »

~FLOW~ wrote: Wed Jan 11, 2023 4:08 pm now everything seem to be ok ! Only 1 package.
Shoud I try to upgrade to v 8 ?
Change first MX-repo to another one.
Gigabyte Z77M-D3H, Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2 (Quad core), 32GB RAM,
GeForce GTX 770, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 500GB, Seagate Barracuda 4TB

User avatar
timkb4cq
Developer
Posts: 3206
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 4:05 pm

Re: MX Package Installer - two options of the same package ?

#13 Post by timkb4cq »

it.mxrepo.com is updating properly now, but it may take a while to finish.
HP Pavillion TP01, AMD Ryzen 3 5300G (quad core), Crucial 500GB SSD, Toshiba 6TB 7200rpm
Dell Inspiron 15, AMD Ryzen 7 2700u (quad core). Sabrent 500GB nvme, Seagate 1TB

User avatar
~FLOW~
Posts: 273
Joined: Thu May 19, 2022 12:43 pm

Re: MX Package Installer - two options of the same package ?

#14 Post by ~FLOW~ »

timkb4cq wrote: Wed Jan 11, 2023 4:22 pm it.mxrepo.com is updating properly now, but it may take a while to finish.
now it's working.
Thank you all !
MX-23 / KDE Plasma 5.27.5
Kernel: 6.5

Be patient !!
What seams easy for you now, for a newbie might be a monumental helping hand.
An efficient pack will move as fast as the slowest member.

User avatar
~FLOW~
Posts: 273
Joined: Thu May 19, 2022 12:43 pm

Re: MX Package Installer - two options of the same package ?

#15 Post by ~FLOW~ »

Hello again,
I have a different problem now, still with Wine.
I'm trying to install winehq-staging on a fresh MX install.
in MX Package Installer - MX Test Repo I get this error in console :

Code: Select all

Hit:1 http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye-security InRelease
Hit:2 http://deb.debian.org/debian bullseye-updates InRelease
Hit:3 http://deb.debian.org/debian bullseye InRelease
Hit:4 http://deb.debian.org/debian bullseye-backports InRelease
Hit:5 http://it.mxrepo.com/mx/repo bullseye InRelease
Get:6 http://it.mxrepo.com/mx/testrepo bullseye InRelease [6.769 B]
Get:7 http://it.mxrepo.com/mx/testrepo bullseye/test i386 Packages [462 kB]
Get:8 http://it.mxrepo.com/mx/testrepo bullseye/test amd64 Packages [471 kB]
Get:9 http://it.mxrepo.com/mx/testrepo bullseye/test i386 Contents (deb) [2.351 kB]
Get:10 http://it.mxrepo.com/mx/testrepo bullseye/test amd64 Contents (deb) [2.643 kB]
Fetched 5.935 kB in 4s (1.621 kB/s)
Reading package lists...
Reading package lists...
Building dependency tree...
Reading state information...
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 winehq-staging : Depends: wine-staging (= 8.0-0rc5-0mx21+1)
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
Hit:1 http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye-security InRelease
Hit:2 http://deb.debian.org/debian bullseye-updates InRelease
Get:3 http://it.mxrepo.com/mx/repo bullseye InRelease [19,9 kB]
Hit:4 http://deb.debian.org/debian bullseye InRelease
Hit:5 http://deb.debian.org/debian bullseye-backports InRelease
Get:6 http://it.mxrepo.com/mx/repo bullseye/main i386 Packages [358 kB]
Get:7 http://it.mxrepo.com/mx/repo bullseye/main amd64 Packages [364 kB]
Fetched 742 kB in 2s (475 kB/s)
Reading package lists...
So I see this :

Code: Select all

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 winehq-staging : Depends: wine-staging (= 8.0-0rc5-0mx21+1)
but I don't undestand what is the difference betwen wine-staging and winehq-staging.
I know that in the Wine Wiki is recommended : sudo apt install --install-recommends winehq-staging
Am I doing something wrong ? I tried switching the repos but I get the same error.

Code: Select all

System:    Kernel: 6.1.0-2mx-amd64 [6.1.7-1~mx21+1] x86_64 bits: 64 compiler: gcc v: 10.2.1 
           parameters: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-6.1.0-2mx-amd64 
           root=UUID=<filter> ro quiet splash 
           Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.20.5 wm: kwin_x11 vt: 7 dm: SDDM 
           Distro: MX-21.3_KDE_x64 Wildflower January 15  2023 
           base: Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye) 
Machine:   Type: Laptop System: Hewlett-Packard product: HP EliteBook 840 G2 v: A3009D510303 
           serial: <filter> Chassis: type: 10 serial: <filter> 
           Mobo: Hewlett-Packard model: 2216 v: KBC Version 96.5B serial: <filter> 
           UEFI: Hewlett-Packard v: M71 Ver. 01.31 date: 02/24/2020 
Battery:   ID-1: BAT0 charge: 24.8 Wh (62.6%) condition: 39.6/39.6 Wh (100.0%) volts: 11.3 
           min: 11.4 model: Hewlett-Packard Primary type: Li-ion serial: <filter> 
           status: Discharging 
CPU:       Info: Dual Core model: Intel Core i5-5200U bits: 64 type: MT MCP arch: Broadwell 
           family: 6 model-id: 3D (61) stepping: 4 microcode: 2F cache: L2: 3 MiB 
           flags: avx avx2 lm nx pae sse sse2 sse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 ssse3 vmx bogomips: 17558 
           Speed: 1784 MHz min/max: 500/2700 MHz Core speeds (MHz): 1: 1784 2: 1930 3: 1624 
           4: 1796 
           Vulnerabilities: Type: itlb_multihit status: KVM: VMX disabled 
           Type: l1tf mitigation: PTE Inversion; VMX: conditional cache flushes, SMT vulnerable 
           Type: mds mitigation: Clear CPU buffers; SMT vulnerable 
           Type: meltdown mitigation: PTI 
           Type: mmio_stale_data status: Unknown: No mitigations 
           Type: retbleed status: Not affected 
           Type: spec_store_bypass mitigation: Speculative Store Bypass disabled via prctl 
           Type: spectre_v1 mitigation: usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization 
           Type: spectre_v2 mitigation: Retpolines, IBPB: conditional, IBRS_FW, STIBP: 
           conditional, RSB filling, PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected 
           Type: srbds mitigation: Microcode 
           Type: tsx_async_abort status: Not affected 
Graphics:  Device-1: Intel HD Graphics 5500 
           vendor: Hewlett-Packard ZBook 15u G2 Mobile Workstation driver: i915 v: kernel 
           bus-ID: 00:02.0 chip-ID: 8086:1616 class-ID: 0300 
           Device-2: Chicony HP HD Webcam type: USB driver: uvcvideo bus-ID: 2-7:6 
           chip-ID: 04f2:b477 class-ID: 0e02 serial: <filter> 
           Display: x11 server: X.Org 1.20.14 compositor: kwin_x11 driver: loaded: modesetting 
           unloaded: fbdev,vesa display-ID: :0 screens: 1 
           Screen-1: 0 s-res: 1600x900 s-dpi: 96 s-size: 423x238mm (16.7x9.4") 
           s-diag: 485mm (19.1") 
           Monitor-1: eDP-1 res: 1600x900 hz: 60 dpi: 132 size: 309x174mm (12.2x6.9") 
           diag: 355mm (14") 
           OpenGL: renderer: Mesa Intel HD Graphics 5500 (BDW GT2) v: 4.6 Mesa 22.0.5 
           direct render: Yes 
Audio:     Device-1: Intel Broadwell-U Audio vendor: Hewlett-Packard driver: snd_hda_intel 
           v: kernel bus-ID: 00:03.0 chip-ID: 8086:160c class-ID: 0403 
           Device-2: Intel Wildcat Point-LP High Definition Audio vendor: Hewlett-Packard 
           driver: snd_hda_intel v: kernel bus-ID: 00:1b.0 chip-ID: 8086:9ca0 class-ID: 0403 
           Sound Server-1: ALSA v: k6.1.0-2mx-amd64 running: yes 
           Sound Server-2: PulseAudio v: 14.2 running: yes 
Network:   Device-1: Intel Ethernet I218-LM vendor: Hewlett-Packard driver: e1000e v: kernel 
           port: 5080 bus-ID: 00:19.0 chip-ID: 8086:15a2 class-ID: 0200 
           IF: eth0 state: down mac: <filter> 
           Device-2: Intel Wireless 7265 driver: iwlwifi v: kernel modules: wl port: ef80 
           bus-ID: 03:00.0 chip-ID: 8086:095a class-ID: 0280 
           IF: wlan0 state: up mac: <filter> 
           Device-3: HP HP hs3110 HSPA+ Mobile Broadband Device type: USB driver: N/A 
           bus-ID: 2-6:5 chip-ID: 03f0:521d class-ID: ff00 
Bluetooth: Device-1: Intel Bluetooth wireless interface type: USB driver: btusb v: 0.8 
           bus-ID: 2-4:3 chip-ID: 8087:0a2a class-ID: e001 
           Report: hciconfig ID: hci0 rfk-id: 1 state: down bt-service: N/A rfk-block: 
           hardware: no software: no address: <filter> 
           Info: acl-mtu: 1021:5 sco-mtu: 96:6 link-policy: rswitch hold sniff 
           link-mode: slave accept 
Drives:    Local Storage: total: 465.76 GiB used: 16.33 GiB (3.5%) 
           SMART Message: Unable to run smartctl. Root privileges required. 
           ID-1: /dev/sda maj-min: 8:0 vendor: Crucial model: CT500MX500SSD1 size: 465.76 GiB 
           block-size: physical: 4096 B logical: 512 B speed: 6.0 Gb/s type: SSD serial: <filter> 
           rev: 023 scheme: GPT 
Partition: ID-1: / raw-size: 87.64 GiB size: 85.71 GiB (97.80%) used: 16.05 GiB (18.7%) fs: ext4 
           dev: /dev/dm-0 maj-min: 253:0 mapped: root.fsm 
           ID-2: /boot raw-size: 2 GiB size: 1.9 GiB (95.01%) used: 246.3 MiB (12.7%) fs: ext4 
           dev: /dev/sda6 maj-min: 8:6 
           ID-3: /boot/efi raw-size: 100 MiB size: 96 MiB (96.00%) used: 25.3 MiB (26.3%) fs: vfat 
           dev: /dev/sda1 maj-min: 8:1 
Swap:      Kernel: swappiness: 15 (default 60) cache-pressure: 100 (default) 
           ID-1: swap-1 type: partition size: 7.98 GiB used: 0 KiB (0.0%) priority: -2 
           dev: /dev/dm-1 maj-min: 253:1 mapped: swap 
Sensors:   System Temperatures: cpu: 40.0 C mobo: 0.0 C 
           Fan Speeds (RPM): N/A 
Repos:     Packages: note: see --pkg apt: 2294 lib: 1250 flatpak: 0 
           No active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list 
           Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian-stable-updates.list 
           1: deb http://deb.debian.org/debian bullseye-updates main contrib non-free
           Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian.list 
           1: deb http://deb.debian.org/debian bullseye main contrib non-free
           2: deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye-security main contrib non-free
           3: deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian bullseye main contrib non-free
           4: deb http://deb.debian.org/debian bullseye-backports main contrib non-free
           Active apt repos in: /etc/apt/sources.list.d/mx.list 
           1: deb http://it.mxrepo.com/mx/repo/ bullseye main non-free
Info:      Processes: 209 Uptime: 1h 2m wakeups: 2 Memory: 7.18 GiB used: 2.39 GiB (33.3%) 
           Init: SysVinit v: 2.96 runlevel: 5 default: 5 tool: systemctl Compilers: gcc: N/A 
           alt: 10 Client: shell wrapper v: 5.1.4-release inxi: 3.3.06 
Boot Mode: UEFI
MX-23 / KDE Plasma 5.27.5
Kernel: 6.5

Be patient !!
What seams easy for you now, for a newbie might be a monumental helping hand.
An efficient pack will move as fast as the slowest member.

User avatar
Adrian
Developer
Posts: 8269
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 1:42 am

Re: MX Package Installer - two options of the same package ?

#16 Post by Adrian »

Please don't post something unrelated into an old thread that is marked as [Solved] it will confuse things, people will think that the thread is solved so they will not pay attention and people who are looking for a solution will see the thread marked [Solved] and they will not understand where the solution is if you are talking about a different issue.

User avatar
~FLOW~
Posts: 273
Joined: Thu May 19, 2022 12:43 pm

Re: MX Package Installer - two options of the same package ?

#17 Post by ~FLOW~ »

Adrian wrote: Mon Jan 30, 2023 3:54 pm Please don't post something unrelated into an old thread that is marked as [Solved] it will confuse things, people will think that the thread is solved so they will not pay attention and people who are looking for a solution will see the thread marked [Solved] and they will not understand where the solution is if you are talking about a different issue.
Sorry, I thought that this is related. Should I open another one ?
or mark this one unsolved
MX-23 / KDE Plasma 5.27.5
Kernel: 6.5

Be patient !!
What seams easy for you now, for a newbie might be a monumental helping hand.
An efficient pack will move as fast as the slowest member.

User avatar
Adrian
Developer
Posts: 8269
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 1:42 am

Re: MX Package Installer - two options of the same package ?

#18 Post by Adrian »

Was the first problem solved? If yes, then leave it "solved' if not uncheck that.

Even this is question 'is this the same problem or a different one" should not even be something that wastes time of follow forum readers, if it's not clearly the same problem, open a new thread.

User avatar
~FLOW~
Posts: 273
Joined: Thu May 19, 2022 12:43 pm

Re: MX Package Installer - two options of the same package ?

#19 Post by ~FLOW~ »

Adrian wrote: Mon Jan 30, 2023 4:01 pm Was the first problem solved? If yes, then leave it "solved' if not uncheck that.

Even this is question 'is this the same problem or a different one" should not even be something that wastes time of follow forum readers, if it's not clearly the same problem, open a new thread.
I created a new thread.
MX-23 / KDE Plasma 5.27.5
Kernel: 6.5

Be patient !!
What seams easy for you now, for a newbie might be a monumental helping hand.
An efficient pack will move as fast as the slowest member.

Post Reply

Return to “General”