Fdisk - MX18
Fdisk - MX18
Has anyone else experienced problems with fdisk(?), I was trying to reformat an old SATA 160GB drive yesterday, & it kept telling me it was only 4MB in size(!).
So I tried a couple of SSD 64GB drives, known to be good, & it told me that they too were only 4MB in size.
So I went to my AntiX installation, (17.4), & repartitioned the 160GB HDD on there, no problems.
Everything else on my MX18 installs seems to be working OK, so far, so thought this rather odd behaviour for fdisk.
So I tried a couple of SSD 64GB drives, known to be good, & it told me that they too were only 4MB in size.
So I went to my AntiX installation, (17.4), & repartitioned the 160GB HDD on there, no problems.
Everything else on my MX18 installs seems to be working OK, so far, so thought this rather odd behaviour for fdisk.
(FOSS, Linux, & BSD since 1999)
Re: Fdisk - MX18
I prefer GParted (it's GUI).
So I did not experience problem with fdisk
So I did not experience problem with fdisk
MX-18 Continuum x86_64: laptop Dell Inspiron N7110, Intel Core i5-2410M @ 2.900GHz, 4GB RAM, Kernel: 4.19, DE: Xfce
- Head_on_a_Stick
- Posts: 919
- Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2019 3:37 pm
Re: Fdisk - MX18
Can you post the actual command output? That might help illuminate the situation.
FWIW, fdisk(8) works fine in my Debian buster system:
Code: Select all
shinken:~$ sudo fdisk -l /dev/sda
Disk /dev/sda: 111.8 GiB, 120034123776 bytes, 234441648 sectors
Disk model: KINGSTON SV300S3
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0x286ee55f
Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
/dev/sda1 2048 167774207 167772160 80G a6 OpenBSD
/dev/sda2 167774208 167839744 65537 32M 83 Linux
/dev/sda3 167841792 230756351 62914560 30G 83 Linux
/dev/sda4 230756352 234441647 3685296 1.8G 82 Linux swap / Solaris
shinken:~$
mod note: Signature removed, please read the forum rules
Re: Fdisk - MX18
Hmm, just tried it with both the SSD I checked yesterday, & it's working fine now, everything I used, I tried yesterday - so must have been one of the updates that I received yesterday must have sorted it out.
Thanks for looking.
@ Fibogacci - I'm 'old school', I do most admin tasks via the command line.
Thanks for looking.
@ Fibogacci - I'm 'old school', I do most admin tasks via the command line.
(FOSS, Linux, & BSD since 1999)
Re: Fdisk - MX18
I really like command line, it's a real pleasure for me to use it.mxer wrote: ↑Thu Apr 18, 2019 8:55 am Hmm, just tried it with both the SSD I checked yesterday, & it's working fine now, everything I used, I tried yesterday - so must have been one of the updates that I received yesterday must have sorted it out.
Thanks for looking.
@ Fibogacci - I'm 'old school', I do most admin tasks via the command line.
But for partitioning I use GParted. So I will try one day fdisk just for learning and for fun. New skill is always welcomed
MX-18 Continuum x86_64: laptop Dell Inspiron N7110, Intel Core i5-2410M @ 2.900GHz, 4GB RAM, Kernel: 4.19, DE: Xfce
Re: Fdisk - MX18
You may want to give antiX a try someday. We've been working on making the command line more powerful and more fun. On the live system antiX-cli-cc (antiX Command Line Control Centre) is added to the bash history so you can get to it with <up-arrow>. You might be surprised by what is available. For example, cli-aptiX works like Synaptic in many ways but is based on the command line. For the tasks I do most often, I think it is actually easier to use.
Some of it is already in MX. Maybe there is (or could be) an MXPI entry to pull the rest of it in.
"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself -- and you are the easiest person to fool."
-- Richard Feynman
-- Richard Feynman
Re: Fdisk - MX18
@Fibogacci
Don't stop at looking at fdisk, check out cfdisk too, you may like it better, both good command line tools.
@ BitJam
I've been a regular user of AntiX for several years now, preferring the 'base' version, but recently using 'full', (anti even made me a mod, but not liking the forum software, I don't visit as often as I should).
I have used 'core' a few times, & sometimes keep it around for fun.
But recently I've been having Firefox troubles, on several installations of 'full', it hangs after a few minutes, & I have to shut it down & restart it, then it's OK for my session, So, I thought I'd come & try MX again. Not getting so much trouble with the later version of Firefox used in it, so I might just convert my other machines, as I like to stick with basically just the one distro, & MX will 'keep it in the family'.
(P.S. My tag is 'fatmac' on the other forum.)
Don't stop at looking at fdisk, check out cfdisk too, you may like it better, both good command line tools.
@ BitJam
I've been a regular user of AntiX for several years now, preferring the 'base' version, but recently using 'full', (anti even made me a mod, but not liking the forum software, I don't visit as often as I should).
I have used 'core' a few times, & sometimes keep it around for fun.
But recently I've been having Firefox troubles, on several installations of 'full', it hangs after a few minutes, & I have to shut it down & restart it, then it's OK for my session, So, I thought I'd come & try MX again. Not getting so much trouble with the later version of Firefox used in it, so I might just convert my other machines, as I like to stick with basically just the one distro, & MX will 'keep it in the family'.
(P.S. My tag is 'fatmac' on the other forum.)
(FOSS, Linux, & BSD since 1999)
Re: Fdisk - MX18
Hey fatmac! I did not recognize you! Did you report the antiX Firefox problem?
PS: I agree with you that these forums are much easier to use.
"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself -- and you are the easiest person to fool."
-- Richard Feynman
-- Richard Feynman
Re: Fdisk - MX18
When I saw the topic I thought "fdisk?, I didn't know that was in MX?" I had used fdisk in DOS for years and cfdisk in linux. But I didn't know we had an fdisk in linux. Learned something new.mxer wrote: ↑Fri Apr 19, 2019 6:12 am @Fibogacci
Don't stop at looking at fdisk, check out cfdisk too, you may like it better, both good command line tools.
@ BitJam
I've been a regular user of AntiX for several years now, preferring the 'base' version, but recently using 'full', (anti even made me a mod, but not liking the forum software, I don't visit as often as I should).
I have used 'core' a few times, & sometimes keep it around for fun.
But recently I've been having Firefox troubles, on several installations of 'full', it hangs after a few minutes, & I have to shut it down & restart it, then it's OK for my session, So, I thought I'd come & try MX again. Not getting so much trouble with the later version of Firefox used in it, so I might just convert my other machines, as I like to stick with basically just the one distro, & MX will 'keep it in the family'.
(P.S. My tag is 'fatmac' on the other forum.)
I also do not like the antiX forum software. Why can't we use the same software as we have here in the MX forum? I'm ignorant about such things. All I know is that I prefer the MX forum. And there is an antiX section. But we're not supposed to use that section as the antiX forum? I'm not sure how it all relates.
I have been using "Core" recently and staying away from the X. The music software works great. And I learned about several CLI apps from using the cli-aptiX package manager. Good stuff.
I'm a two distro user, antiX and MX. That's because I have a lot of old hardware and MX is best with better equipment. I use antiX for my systems with 1GB or less.
Seaken64
MX21-64 XFCE & W11 on Lenovo 330S LT. MX21-KDE & MX21-XFCE on Live USB.
MX18-64 & W7, Fedora on HP Core2 DT
MX21-32 XFCE w/ MX-Fluxbox on P4HT DT w/ antiX21, SUSE Tumbleweed, Q4OS, WXP
antiX21 on Compaq PIII 1 Ghz DT, w/ Debian, MX18FB, W2K
MX18-64 & W7, Fedora on HP Core2 DT
MX21-32 XFCE w/ MX-Fluxbox on P4HT DT w/ antiX21, SUSE Tumbleweed, Q4OS, WXP
antiX21 on Compaq PIII 1 Ghz DT, w/ Debian, MX18FB, W2K
Re: Fdisk - MX18
Didn't bother reporting it as I think it is Firefox itself, I get the occasional freeze on MX too.
(Just switch to a new tab & delete the locked one.)
Maybe there is a better browser, (Palemoon ?), but I'm just so used to using Firefox.
(FOSS, Linux, & BSD since 1999)