The kernel problem with recent updates has been solved. Find the solution here

Important information
-- Required MX 15/16 Repository Changes
-- Information on torrent hosting changes
-- Information on MX15/16 GPG Keys
-- Spectre and Meltdown vulnerabilities

-- Introducing our new Website
-- MX Linux on social media: here

Current releases
-- MX-18.3 Point Release release info here
-- Migration Information to MX-18 here
-- antiX-17.4.1 release info here

New users
-- Please read this first, and don't forget to add system and hardware information to posts!
-- Here are the Forum Rules

MX-17.1: Should one use "irqbalance"? If so, on what types of hardware platforms?

Post Reply
User avatar
Forum Guide
Forum Guide
Posts: 1029
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 12:09 pm

MX-17.1: Should one use "irqbalance"? If so, on what types of hardware platforms?


Post by MX-16_fan » Sat Sep 22, 2018 6:16 am


I noticed that the irqbalance (https://github.com/Irqbalance/irqbalance) package is available in MX-17's (Debian's) repos.

Would anyone happen to know
  1. in combination with what hardware use of this package can be recommended,
  2. whether use of this package, from a dogmatic point of view, has the potential to endanger your system?
Regarding question #1, the answer given here: https://serverfault.com/questions/51380 ... n-hardware indicates that, unless you want to build a rather static, manually optimized system, use of irqbalance would always be advisable.

But I guess that if that was the whole truth, irqbalance would be installed in MX-17 by default.

Regarding question #2, I'd naïvely hope that irqbalance's ability to switch interrupt requests (IRQs) wouldn't mean that irqbalance could gain direct access to the data the processor is to deal with. I might, however, be completely wrong here. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

Thanks in advance for any answer, and a great weekend to all of you :number1:, Joe

Post Reply

Return to “Software / Configuration”