Welcome!
Important information
-- Spectre and Meltdown vulnerabilities
-- Change in MX sources

News
-- MX Linux on social media: here
-- Mepis support still here

Current releases
-- MX-17.1 Final release info here
-- antiX-17 release info here

New users
-- Please read this first, and don't forget to add system and hardware information to posts!
-- Here are the Forum Rules

Search found 286 matches

by oops
Fri Sep 21, 2018 2:19 pm
Forum: Package Requests/Status - MX 17
Topic: MX 17 Repository: The Pale Moon Browser Thread
Replies: 77
Views: 5959

Re: MX 17 Repository: The Pale Moon Browser Thread

Thank you Stevo to maintain this soft, I now really like PaleMoon (my favorite web browser).
by oops
Wed Sep 19, 2018 4:17 pm
Forum: Themes and Screenshots
Topic: MX Tools fonts
Replies: 10
Views: 150

Re: MX Tools fonts

I guess it is also into: Settings -> ... QT5 parameters
by oops
Wed Sep 19, 2018 3:19 pm
Forum: Package Requests/Status - MX 17
Topic: Three more package requests: XnView MP, NConvert, ffqueue
Replies: 10
Views: 616

Re: Three more package requests: XnView MP, NConvert, ffqueue

... XnView MP has a slightly different restriction: XnView MP is provided as FREEWARE (NO Adware, NO Spyware) for private or educational use (including non-profit organizations). We can't police how our users use the software in our repositories so, like debian, we don't put packages with that rest...
by oops
Wed Sep 19, 2018 10:18 am
Forum: Package Requests/Status - MX 17
Topic: MX 17 Repository: The Flatpak Thread
Replies: 10
Views: 209

Re: MX 17 Repository--flatpak

.... I haven't tested yet, but you can just set system wide FLATPAK_SYSTEM_DIR to somewhere else so the flatpak executable ( and MX Pakcage installer) know where to look for the system installed apps and runtimes. ... In fact, for only few extra app, appimage is/seems more efficient. mx-packageinst...
by oops
Tue Sep 18, 2018 3:26 pm
Forum: Package Requests/Status - MX 17
Topic: MX 17 Repository: The Flatpak Thread
Replies: 10
Views: 209

Re: MX 17 Repository--flatpak

... Yes, and no fehlix, if each user (for example 5) wants the same app (even few), a lot of doubloons are créated by this way, the user install way (5 X 2.8GiB). in the case above. No? (not tested)
by oops
Tue Sep 18, 2018 3:09 pm
Forum: General
Topic: Ideas for a "Quick Start" document
Replies: 67
Views: 4727

Re: Ideas for a "Quick Start" document

FI: For "Quick Start" document, app, etc I now use synapse.
http://forum.mxlinux.org/viewtopic.php?f=93&t=46226
by oops
Tue Sep 18, 2018 2:49 pm
Forum: Package Requests/Status - MX 17
Topic: MX 17 Repository: The Flatpak Thread
Replies: 10
Views: 209

Re: MX 17 Repository--flatpak

For the new version of Flatpak, for me it will be interesting to have an option to use:
/home/var/lib/flatpak instead /var/lib/flatpak, because I do not want to clutter my/the root partition (see below)
https://forum.mxlinux.org/viewtopic.php ... 20#p461037
by oops
Tue Sep 18, 2018 2:36 pm
Forum: Package Requests/Status - MX 17
Topic: MX 17 Repository: The Liquorix Kernel Thread
Replies: 80
Views: 9257

Re: MX 17 Repository: The Liquorix Kernel Thread

... One newbe question: What is the main advantage of the Liquorix Kernel, is it mostly for the compilation process and/ or gaming ?
Some tests here:
https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page= ... .17-Kernel
by oops
Mon Sep 17, 2018 5:25 am
Forum: Software / Configuration
Topic: To systemd or not systemd - Ever wonder about it?
Replies: 30
Views: 2234

Re: To systemd or not systemd - Ever wonder about it?

timkb4cq wrote:
Sat Jun 30, 2018 12:23 pm
...
But systemd certainly tries to do too much, needlessly reinventing wheels, gears, levers, and pipes. Some of its bits are quite useful but I don't want it in charge.
+1
by oops
Mon Sep 17, 2018 5:04 am
Forum: Documentation and videos
Topic: New features in MX Package Installer (Now with flatpaks)
Replies: 38
Views: 862

Re: New features in MX Package Installer (Now with flatpaks)

In Adrian's thread asking for testers to try the MXPI prototype:
https://forum.mxlinux.org/viewtopic.php?f=118&t=46322
...@asqwerth PS: tried but: Information: You are not authorised to read this forum.

Go to advanced search